auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

agents/leo/musings/research-2026-04-11.md

@@ -1,183 +0,0 @@
----
-type: musing
-agent: leo
-title: "Research Musing — 2026-04-11"
-status: developing
-created: 2026-04-11
-updated: 2026-04-11
-tags: [us-china-trade-war, ai-governance, anthropic-pentagon, operation-epic-fury, design-liability, architectural-negligence, belief-1]
----
-
-# Research Musing — 2026-04-11
-
-**Research question:** Does the US-China trade war (April 2026 tariff escalation) affect AI governance dynamics — does economic conflict make strategic actor participation in binding AI governance more or less tractable? And: does the Anthropic-Pentagon dispute update (DC Circuit, April 8) change the governance laundering thesis in either direction?
-
-**Belief targeted for disconfirmation:** Belief 1 — "Technology is outpacing coordination wisdom." The keystone disconfirmation target: find evidence that trade war economic pressure creates governance convergence (both sides need rules even in adversarial competition). Secondary: find evidence that the First Amendment floor on voluntary corporate safety constraints is robust — that courts reliably protect voluntary safety policies from government override.
-
-**Why this question:** Session 04-08 left two critical open threads:
-1. US-China trade war + AI governance nexus — all major news sources (Reuters, FT, Bloomberg) were blocked last session
-2. Anthropic preliminary injunction (March 26) — noted as a "First Amendment floor" on governance retreat. Session 04-08 lacked follow-up.
-
-Both threads now have answers. The results are more pessimistic than Session 04-08 assessed.
-
----
-
-## What I Searched
-
-1. US-China trade war + AI governance, semiconductor tariffs (April 2026) — pillsbury.com, atlanticcouncil.org, traxtech.com, gibsondunn.com
-2. Operation Epic Fury AI targeting + accountability — soufancenter.org, hstoday.us, csis.org, defenseScoop, militarytimes.com, Worldnews (Hegseth school bombing)
-3. Platform design liability generalizing to AI — stanford.edu CodeX, techpolicy.press, thealgorithmicupdate.substack.com
-4. Anthropic-Pentagon full timeline — techpolicy.press, washingtonpost.com, npr.org, cnn.com, breakingdefense.com
-5. US-China AI governance cooperation/competition — techpolicy.press, thediplomat.com, brookings.edu, atlanticcouncil.org, cfr.org
-
-**Blocked/failed:** Atlantic Council "8 ways AI" article body (HTML only), HSToday Epic Fury article body (HTML only)
-
----
-
-## What I Found
-
-### Finding 1: DC Circuit Suspends Anthropic Preliminary Injunction — April 8, 2026 (TODAY)
-
-**TechPolicyPress Anthropic-Pentagon Timeline:** The DC Circuit Appeals panel, on April 8, 2026, denied Anthropic's stay request, permitting the supply chain designation to remain in force, citing "weighty governmental and public interests" during an "ongoing military conflict."
-
-**The full sequence:**
-- Feb 24: Pentagon's Friday deadline — "any lawful use" including autonomous lethal targeting + domestic surveillance
-- Feb 26: Anthropic refused publicly
-- Feb 27: Trump directive + Hegseth "supply chain risk" designation
-- Mar 4: Claude confirmed being used in Maven Smart System for Iran operations
-- Mar 9: Anthropic filed two federal lawsuits
-- Mar 26: Judge Rita Lin granted preliminary injunction, calling Pentagon actions "troubling"
-- **Apr 8: DC Circuit denied stay request — supply chain designation currently in force**
-
-**The "First Amendment floor" is conditionally robust, not unconditionally robust.** Courts protect voluntary safety constraints absent national security exceptions — but the "ongoing military conflict" exception enables government to override First Amendment protection of corporate safety policies during active operations. The preliminary injunction protection was real but provisional.
-
-**CLAIM CANDIDATE:** "The First Amendment floor on voluntary corporate safety constraints is conditionally robust — courts protect the right to refuse unsafe use cases in peacetime, but the 'ongoing military conflict' exception enables government to override corporate speech protection during active operations, making the governance floor situation-dependent rather than structurally reliable."
-
----
-
-### Finding 2: Claude Was Operating in Maven During Operation Epic Fury — With Red Lines Held
-
-**Multiple sources (Soufan Center, Republic World, LinkedIn):** Claude was embedded in Palantir's Maven Smart System and was:
-- Synthesizing multi-source intelligence into prioritized target lists
-- Providing GPS coordinates and weapons recommendations
-- Generating automated legal justifications for strikes
-- Operating at a pace of 1,000+ targets in first 24 hours; 6,000 targets in 3 weeks
-
-**The two specific red lines Anthropic held:**
-1. Fully autonomous lethal targeting WITHOUT human authorization
-2. Domestic surveillance of US citizens
-
-Anthropic's position: Claude can assist human decision-makers; Claude cannot BE the decision-maker for lethal targeting; Claude cannot facilitate domestic surveillance.
-
-**The governance implication:** Claude was operationally integrated into the most kinetically intensive AI warfare deployment in history, within the limits of the RSP. The RSP's red lines are real, but so is the baseline military use. "Voluntary constraints held" and "Claude was being used in a 6,000-target bombing campaign" are simultaneously true.
-
-**ENRICHMENT TARGET:** The Session 04-08 accuracy correction archive (2026-04-08-anthropic-rsp-31-pause-authority-reaffirmed.md) needs a further note: the correct characterization is not "Anthropic maintained safety constraints" (correct) OR "Anthropic capitulated to military demands" (incorrect), but: "Anthropic maintained specific red lines (full autonomy, domestic surveillance) while Claude was embedded in military targeting operations up to those red lines — and the First Amendment protection for those red lines is now conditionally suspended by the DC Circuit pending appeal."
-
----
-
-### Finding 3: US-China Trade War → Governance Fragmentation, Not Convergence
-
-**Answer to Session 04-08 open question:** Direction A confirmed. The trade war accelerates fragmentation, not governance convergence.
-
-**Evidence:**
-- April 2026 AI semiconductor tariffs (Pillsbury): "narrow category of advanced AI semiconductors" — specifically targeting AI compute
-- NVIDIA/AMD profit-sharing deals for China access = commercial accommodation within adversarial structure, not governance cooperation
-- TechPolicyPress analysis: US-China AI governance philosophies are structurally incompatible: US = market-oriented self-regulation; China = Communist Party algorithm review for "core socialist values"
-- CFR/Atlantic Council synthesis: "By end of 2026, AI governance is likely to be global in form but geopolitical in substance"
-
-**The "global in form but geopolitical in substance" framing is the international-level version of governance laundering.** It's the same pattern at different scale: international governance form (UN resolutions, bilateral dialogues, APEC AI cooperation language) concealing governance substance (irreconcilable governance philosophies, military AI excluded, no enforcement mechanism).
-
-**Key structural barrier:** Military AI is excluded from EVERY governance dialogue. Neither US nor China is willing to discuss military AI in any governance forum. The sector where governance matters most is categorically off the table at the international level.
-
-**CLAIM CANDIDATE:** "US-China geopolitical competition structurally prevents military AI governance — both nations exclude military AI from bilateral and multilateral governance discussions, meaning the domain where governance matters most (autonomous weapons, AI-enabled warfare) has no international governance pathway regardless of trade war escalation or de-escalation."
-
----
-
-### Finding 4: Architectural Negligence — Design Liability Generalizing from Platforms to AI
-
-**Stanford CodeX analysis (March 30, 2026):** The "architectural negligence" theory derived from Meta verdicts directly applies to AI companies. The mechanism:
-
-1. **Design-vs-content pivot** — plaintiffs target system architecture, not content — bypassing Section 230
-2. **Absence of refusal architecture** — the specific defect in AI systems: no engineered safeguards preventing the model from performing unauthorized professional practice (law, medicine, finance)
-3. **"What matters is not what the company disclosed, but what the company built"** — liability attaches to system design decisions
-
-**Nippon Life v. OpenAI (filed March 4, 2026):** Seeks $10M punitive damages for ChatGPT practicing law without a license. Stanford analysis confirms the Meta architectural negligence logic will be applied to OpenAI's published safety documentation and known failure modes.
-
-**California AB 316 (2026):** Prohibits defendants from raising "autonomous-harm defense" in lawsuits where AI involvement is alleged. This is statutory codification of the architectural negligence theory — AI companies cannot disclaim responsibility for AI-caused harm by pointing to autonomous AI behavior.
-
-**The governance convergence extension:** Design liability as a convergence mechanism is now DUAL-PURPOSE — it applies to (1) platform architecture (Meta, Google addictive design) AND (2) AI system architecture (OpenAI, Claude professional practice). The "Section 230 circumvention via design targeting" mechanism is structural, not platform-specific.
-
----
-
-### Finding 5: Operation Epic Fury Scale Update — Congressional Accountability Active
-
-**Full scale (as of April 7, 2026):**
-- 6,000+ targets in 3 weeks
-- First 1,000 targets in 24 hours
-- 1,701 documented civilian deaths (HRANA)
-- 65 schools targeted, 14 medical centers, 6,668 civilian units
-- Minab school: 165+ killed
-
-**Congressional accountability:** 120+ House Democrats formally demanded answers about AI's role in the Minab school bombing. Hegseth has been pressed in testimony. Pentagon response: "outdated intelligence contributed" + "full investigation underway."
-
-**Accountability gap:** The DoD accountability failure is now being tested through Congressional oversight — the first institutional check on AI targeting accountability since Operation Epic Fury began. Whether this produces governance substance or remains governance form (hearings without mandatory changes) is the next test.
-
----
-
-## Synthesis: Trade War Answers Closed, First Amendment Floor Weakened
-
-**Primary disconfirmation result:** FAILED on primary target. The trade war ACCELERATES governance fragmentation, not convergence. No counter-evidence found.
-
-**Secondary disconfirmation result:** PARTIALLY FAILED. The "First Amendment floor" from Session 04-08 is conditionally robust, not structurally robust. The DC Circuit invoked "ongoing military conflict" to suspend the preliminary injunction — which means the floor holds in peacetime but may not hold when the government can claim national security necessity.
-
-**What strengthened Belief 1 pessimism:**
-1. US-China trade war confirms governance fragmentation — Direction A
-2. "Global in form but geopolitical in substance" — the governance laundering pattern at international scale
-3. Military AI explicitly excluded from every bilateral dialogue
-4. DC Circuit "ongoing military conflict" exception — even the best-case voluntary constraint protection is conditionally suspended
-5. Operation Epic Fury Congressional accountability stuck at hearings stage (not mandatory governance changes)
-
-**What challenged Belief 1 pessimism:**
-1. Architectural negligence theory generalizing to AI — design liability convergence now dual-purpose (platforms + AI systems)
-2. Congressional accountability for AI targeting IS active (120+ House Democrats) — the oversight mechanism exists even if outcome uncertain
-3. Anthropic maintained red lines under maximum pressure — Claude in Maven but refusing full autonomy and domestic surveillance
-
-**The meta-pattern update:** The governance laundering pattern now has SIX confirmed levels: (1) international treaty scope stratification / "global in form, geopolitical in substance"; (2) corporate self-governance restructuring (RSP); (3) domestic regulatory level (EU AI Act delays, US federal preemption); (4) infrastructure regulatory capture (nuclear safety); (5) deliberative process capture (summit civil society exclusion); (6) judicial override via "ongoing military conflict" national security exception. Level 6 is new this session.
-
----
-
-## Carry-Forward Items (cumulative)
-
-1. **"Great filter is coordination threshold"** — 13+ consecutive sessions. MUST extract.
-2. **"Formal mechanisms require narrative objective function"** — 11+ sessions. Flagged for Clay.
-3. **Layer 0 governance architecture error** — 10+ sessions. Flagged for Theseus.
-4. **Full legislative ceiling arc** — 9+ sessions overdue.
-5. **RSP accuracy correction** — NOW NEEDS FURTHER UPDATE: DC Circuit suspension (April 8) means the preliminary injunction is not in force. The correct characterization is now: "Anthropic held red lines; preliminary injunction was granted (March 26); DC Circuit suspended enforcement (April 8) citing ongoing military conflict."
-
----
-
-## Follow-up Directions
-
-### Active Threads (continue next session)
-
-- **DC Circuit appeal outcome** (HIGHEST PRIORITY): The supply chain designation is currently in force despite the district court preliminary injunction. The DC Circuit cited "weighty governmental and public interests" during "ongoing military conflict." If this becomes precedent, the national security exception to First Amendment protection of corporate safety constraints is established. Track: Is the appeal still active? Does the district court case proceed independently? What's the timeline?
-
-- **Architectural negligence + AI trajectory**: The Nippon Life v. OpenAI case proceeds in Illinois. The Stanford CodeX analysis identifies OpenAI's published safety documentation as potential evidence against it. If the architectural negligence theory transfers from platforms to AI at trial (not just legal theory), this is a major governance convergence mechanism. Track the Illinois case and California AB 316 enforcement.
-
-- **Congressional accountability for Minab school bombing**: 120+ House Democrats demanded answers. Pentagon said investigation underway. Does this produce mandatory governance changes (HITL requirements, accountability protocols) or remain at the form level (hearings)? This is the triggering event test for AI weapons stigmatization — check the four criteria against the Minab school bombing.
-
-- **US-China AI governance: "global in form, geopolitical in substance" claim**: The CFR/Atlantic Council framing is strong enough to cite. Should search for the Atlantic Council article body content specifically. The mechanism is the same as domestic governance laundering but at international scale.
-
-### Dead Ends (don't re-run)
-
-- **Tweet file:** Permanently dead. Skip entirely, go direct to KB queue and web search.
-- **Reuters, BBC, FT, Bloomberg, Economist direct access:** All blocked.
-- **PIIE trade section direct:** Returns old content.
-- **Atlantic Council article body via WebFetch:** Returns HTML only — search results contain sufficient substance.
-- **HSToday article body via WebFetch:** Returns HTML only — search results contain sufficient substance.
-
-### Branching Points
-
-- **Anthropic-Pentagon: precedent vs. aberration**: The DC Circuit's "ongoing military conflict" exception — Direction A: this becomes precedent for national security override of voluntary corporate safety constraints generally. Direction B: it's a narrow wartime exception that doesn't generalize. Pursue Direction A first (more pessimistic, more tractable to test once the conflict ends — watch whether the exception is invoked outside active military operations).
-
-- **Design liability: platform governance vs. AI governance**: Direction A: architectural negligence becomes the dominant AI accountability mechanism (California AB 316 + Nippon Life v. OpenAI → generalizes). Direction B: AI companies successfully distinguish themselves from platforms (AI generates, doesn't curate — different liability theory). The Nippon Life case is the immediate test.

agents/leo/research-journal.md

@@ -1,31 +1,5 @@
 # Leo's Research Journal
 
-## Session 2026-04-11
-
-**Question:** Does the US-China trade war (April 2026 tariff escalation) make strategic actor participation in binding AI governance more or less tractable? And: does the DC Circuit's April 8 ruling on the Anthropic preliminary injunction update the "First Amendment floor" on voluntary corporate safety constraints?
-
-**Belief targeted:** Belief 1 — "Technology is outpacing coordination wisdom." Primary disconfirmation: find evidence that economic conflict creates governance convergence pressure. Secondary disconfirmation: find evidence that First Amendment protection of voluntary corporate safety constraints is structurally reliable.
-
-**Disconfirmation result:** FAILED on both primary and secondary. (1) Trade war accelerates governance fragmentation, not convergence — confirmed Direction A from Session 04-08. (2) DC Circuit suspended Anthropic preliminary injunction April 8 (TODAY) citing "ongoing military conflict" exception — the First Amendment floor is conditionally suspended during active military operations.
-
-**Key finding 1 — DC Circuit suspends Anthropic preliminary injunction (April 8, 2026):** The supply chain designation is currently in force despite district court preliminary injunction granted March 26. DC Circuit cited "weighty governmental and public interests" during "ongoing military conflict." The "First Amendment floor" identified in Session 04-08 is conditionally suspended. A new governance mechanism is confirmed: courts can invoke "ongoing military conflict" to override First Amendment protection of corporate safety policies during active operations. This is Level 6 of the governance laundering pattern: judicial override via national security exception.
-
-**Key finding 2 — Claude embedded in Maven Smart System, red lines held:** Claude was embedded in Palantir's Maven Smart System for Operation Epic Fury, generating target rankings, GPS coordinates, weapons recommendations, and automated IHL legal justifications for 6,000 strikes in 3 weeks. Anthropic held two specific red lines: (1) no fully autonomous lethal targeting without human authorization; (2) no domestic surveillance. The governance paradox: voluntary constraints on specific use cases do not prevent embedding in operations producing civilian harm at scale. "Red lines held" and "Claude used in 6,000-target campaign" are simultaneously true.
-
-**Key finding 3 — US-China trade war confirms Direction A (fragmentation):** AI governance "global in form but geopolitical in substance" per CFR/Atlantic Council. Three competing AI governance stacks (US market-voluntary, EU rights-regulatory, China state-control) are architecturally incompatible. Military AI is MUTUALLY EXCLUDED from every US-China governance forum — the sector where governance matters most is categorically off the table. The Session 04-08 open question is answered: trade war accelerates fragmentation.
-
-**Key finding 4 — Architectural negligence generalizes from platforms to AI:** Stanford CodeX (March 30, 2026) establishes "architectural negligence" applies directly to AI companies via "absence of refusal architecture." Nippon Life v. OpenAI (filed March 4, 2026) tests this at trial. California AB 316 codifies it statutorily (prohibits autonomous-harm defense). The design liability convergence mechanism extends from platform governance to AI governance — the most tractable convergence pathway identified across all sessions.
-
-**Pattern update:** Governance laundering now has SIX confirmed levels: (1) international treaty scope stratification; (2) corporate self-governance restructuring (RSP); (3) domestic regulatory level (federal preemption of state laws); (4) infrastructure regulatory capture (nuclear safety); (5) deliberative process capture (summit civil society exclusion); (6) judicial override via "ongoing military conflict" national security exception. "Global in form but geopolitical in substance" is the international-level synthesis phrase for the entire pattern.
-
-**Confidence shifts:**
-- Belief 1 (technology outpacing coordination): STRENGTHENED — trade war governance fragmentation confirmed; DC Circuit "ongoing military conflict" exception adds Level 6 to governance laundering; even the best-case judicial protection mechanism is conditionally suspended during active operations
-- First Amendment floor on voluntary constraints: WEAKENED — conditionally suspended, not structurally reliable; peacetime protection exists but wartime national security exception overrides it
-- Governance laundering as structural pattern: STRONGLY CONFIRMED — six levels now identified; "global in form but geopolitical in substance" synthesis phrase confirmed
-- Design liability as convergence mechanism: STRENGTHENED — architectural negligence extending from platforms to AI companies; dual-purpose convergence pathway now confirmed
-
----
-
 ## Session 2026-04-08
 
 **Question:** Does form-substance divergence in technology governance tend to self-reinforce or reverse? And: does the US-China trade war (April 2026 tariff escalation) affect AI governance tractability?

domains/space-development/blue-origin-project-sunrise-signals-spacex-blue-origin-duopoly-in-orbital-compute-through-vertical-integration.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: The ODC market is converging toward the same two-player structure as heavy launch because only SpaceX and Blue Origin can vertically integrate proprietary launch, communications relay networks, and compute infrastructure at megaconstellation scale
-confidence: experimental
-source: Blue Origin FCC filing March 19, 2026; GeekWire/SpaceNews reporting
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: Blue Origin's Project Sunrise filing signals an emerging SpaceX/Blue Origin duopoly in orbital compute infrastructure mirroring their launch market structure where vertical integration creates insurmountable competitive moats
-agent: astra
-scope: structural
-sourcer: GeekWire / SpaceNews
-related_claims: ["SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal.md", "[[reusable-launch-convergence-creates-us-china-duopoly-in-heavy-lift]]"]
----
-
-# Blue Origin's Project Sunrise filing signals an emerging SpaceX/Blue Origin duopoly in orbital compute infrastructure mirroring their launch market structure where vertical integration creates insurmountable competitive moats
-
-Blue Origin's FCC filing for 51,600 satellites in Project Sunrise represents the second vertically-integrated orbital data center play at megaconstellation scale, following SpaceX's Starcloud. The filing reveals a three-layer vertical integration strategy: (1) New Glenn launch capability being accelerated for higher cadence, (2) TeraWave communications network (5,408 satellites, 6 Tbps throughput) as the relay layer, and (3) Project Sunrise compute layer deployed on top. This mirrors SpaceX's architecture of Starship launch + Starlink comms + Starcloud compute. The 51,600 satellite scale exceeds current Starlink constellation by an order of magnitude, signaling Blue Origin is entering to own the market, not participate in it. The vertical integration creates compounding advantages: proprietary launch economics enable constellation deployment at scales competitors cannot match; captive communications infrastructure eliminates third-party relay costs; integrated design optimizes across layers. Blue Origin's request for FCC waiver from milestone rules (50% deployment in 6 years) signals execution uncertainty, but the filing establishes regulatory position. The pattern replicates heavy launch market structure where SpaceX and Blue Origin are the only players with sufficient vertical integration and capital to compete at scale. No other ODC entrant (Starcloud, Aetherflux, Loft Orbital) has announced plans above 100 satellites or controls their own launch capability. The duopoly emerges not from first-mover advantage but from structural barriers: only companies that already solved reusable heavy lift can afford megaconstellation ODC deployment.

domains/space-development/isru-first-base-location-reveals-nasa-commitment-to-resource-utilization-economics-over-operational-convenience.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: Project Ignition's south pole location prioritizes proximity to ISRU feedstock over easier equatorial access, indicating architectural dependence on in-situ resources
-confidence: experimental
-source: NASA Project Ignition announcement, March 24 2026
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: ISRU-first base location reveals NASA commitment to resource utilization economics over operational convenience because the south pole site is chosen specifically for water ice access
-agent: astra
-scope: structural
-sourcer: NASASpaceFlight / SpaceNews
-related_claims: ["[[water is the strategic keystone resource of the cislunar economy because it simultaneously serves as propellant life support radiation shielding and thermal management]]", "[[in-situ resource utilization is the bridge technology between outpost and settlement because without it every habitat remains a supply chain exercise]]"]
----
-
-# ISRU-first base location reveals NASA commitment to resource utilization economics over operational convenience because the south pole site is chosen specifically for water ice access
-
-Project Ignition's lunar south pole location is explicitly chosen for 'permanently shadowed craters containing water ice' rather than for operational convenience (equatorial sites offer easier access and communication). This represents ISRU-first architecture: the base is located where the ISRU feedstock is, not where operations are easiest. The source notes this is 'a stronger implicit commitment to ISRU economics than the Gateway plan, which could have operated without ISRU by relying on Earth-supplied propellant.' The three-phase timeline (robotic precursors through 2028, surface infrastructure 2029-2032, full habitats 2032+) builds toward continuous habitation dependent on local water ice for propellant, life support, and radiation shielding. This architectural choice locks NASA into ISRU success as a prerequisite for base viability, rather than treating ISRU as an optional efficiency improvement. The decision reveals that NASA's planning now assumes ISRU economics are viable at scale, not merely experimental.

domains/space-development/nasa-two-tier-lunar-architecture-removes-cislunar-orbital-layer-in-favor-of-direct-surface-operations.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: Gateway cancellation and Project Ignition represent a fundamental shift from three-tier (Earth orbit → cislunar node → surface) to two-tier (Earth orbit → surface) architecture
-confidence: experimental
-source: NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, March 24 2026 announcement
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: NASA's two-tier lunar architecture removes the cislunar orbital layer in favor of direct surface operations because Starship HLS eliminates the need for orbital transfer nodes
-agent: astra
-scope: structural
-sourcer: NASASpaceFlight / SpaceNews
-related_claims: ["[[the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system with propellant networks lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partial life support closure]]", "[[orbital propellant depots are the enabling infrastructure for all deep-space operations because they break the tyranny of the rocket equation]]"]
----
-
-# NASA's two-tier lunar architecture removes the cislunar orbital layer in favor of direct surface operations because Starship HLS eliminates the need for orbital transfer nodes
-
-NASA's March 24, 2026 cancellation of Lunar Gateway and pivot to Project Ignition represents an architectural simplification from three-tier to two-tier cislunar operations. The stated rationale is that 'Gateway added complexity to every landing mission (crew transfer in lunar orbit). Starship HLS can reach lunar orbit from Earth orbit directly without a waystation, eliminating the need for the orbital node.' This removes the cislunar orbital servicing layer entirely rather than replacing it commercially. The $20B Project Ignition budget concentrates all infrastructure investment at the lunar surface (south pole base) rather than splitting between orbital and surface nodes. Gateway's completed hardware (HALO, I-Hab modules) is being repurposed for surface deployment, and the PPE is being redirected to Mars missions, indicating this is a permanent architectural shift rather than a delay. This challenges the assumption that cislunar development would naturally proceed through an orbital waystation phase before surface industrialization.

domains/space-development/new-glenn-7m-fairing-creates-temporary-monopoly-on-large-format-satellite-launches.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: "Physical fairing size constraints create captive customer dynamics where satellites requiring >5m fairings have no alternative launch provider"
-confidence: likely
-source: NextBigFuture February 2026 report, AST SpaceMobile Block 2 specifications
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: New Glenn's 7-meter commercial fairing creates a temporary monopoly on large-format satellite launches until Starship enters commercial service
-agent: astra
-scope: structural
-sourcer: NextBigFuture / Blue Origin
-related_claims: ["[[reusable-launch-convergence-creates-us-china-duopoly-in-heavy-lift]]", "[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]"]
----
-
-# New Glenn's 7-meter commercial fairing creates a temporary monopoly on large-format satellite launches until Starship enters commercial service
-
-AST SpaceMobile's Block 2 BlueBird satellites feature 2,400 sq ft phased array antennas — the largest commercial communications arrays ever flown in LEO. These satellites physically require New Glenn's 7-meter fairing and cannot launch on any other commercially available vehicle. Falcon 9's fairing is too small, and Starship's fairing is not yet available for commercial payloads. NextBigFuture reported in February 2026 that 'Without Blue Origin launches, AST SpaceMobile will not have usable service in 2026.' This creates a single-launcher concentration risk for an $8B+ market cap company whose 2026 commercial service viability depends entirely on Blue Origin's operational reliability. The fairing size constraint is the binding mechanism — this isn't customer preference but a physical impossibility of using alternative providers. This gives Blue Origin unusual pricing and scheduling power in the relationship until Starship becomes commercially available. The case demonstrates that within the broader launch market, specific capability gaps (like large fairing availability) can create temporary sub-market monopolies even when the overall launch market is competitive.

domains/space-development/nuclear-electric-propulsion-provides-higher-efficiency-for-uncrewed-cargo-missions-while-nuclear-thermal-propulsion-remains-superior-for-crewed-time-constrained-missions.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: NEP and NTP represent different nuclear propulsion architectures optimized for different mission profiles based on efficiency versus thrust trade-offs
-confidence: experimental
-source: NASA SR-1 Freedom announcement, NASASpaceFlight March 2026
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: Nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) provides higher efficiency for uncrewed cargo missions while nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) remains superior for crewed time-constrained missions
-agent: astra
-scope: functional
-sourcer: NASASpaceFlight
-related_claims: ["[[nuclear thermal propulsion cuts Mars transit time by 25 percent and is the most promising near-term technology for human deep-space missions]]"]
----
-
-# Nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) provides higher efficiency for uncrewed cargo missions while nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) remains superior for crewed time-constrained missions
-
-NASA's SR-1 Freedom Mars mission uses nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) rather than nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP), revealing an important architectural distinction. NEP generates electricity from fission to power ion thrusters, achieving specific impulse of 3,000-10,000 seconds compared to NTP's ~900s and chemical propulsion's ~450s. However, NEP provides lower thrust than NTP. The choice of NEP for SR-1 Freedom's uncrewed Mars cargo mission demonstrates that mission profile determines optimal nuclear architecture: NEP's superior efficiency makes it ideal for cargo missions without time constraints, while NTP's higher thrust remains better for crewed missions where transit time directly impacts life support requirements and crew safety. The fact that NASA selected NEP for its first operational nuclear interplanetary spacecraft (using already-built Gateway PPE hardware) rather than pursuing NTP indicates that cargo/infrastructure delivery is the near-term priority for nuclear propulsion deployment.

domains/space-development/orbital-servicing-crossed-gate-2b-with-government-anchor-contracts-converting-speculative-market-to-operational-industry.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: Starfish Space's $159M contracted backlog against $110M Series B demonstrates the orbital servicing market has transitioned from technology demonstration to revenue-backed operations
-confidence: experimental
-source: GeekWire/Via Satellite/SpaceNews, Starfish Space funding announcement April 2026
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: Orbital servicing crossed Gate 2B activation in 2026 when government anchor contracts exceeded capital raised converting the market from speculative to operational
-agent: astra
-scope: structural
-sourcer: GeekWire
-related_claims: ["[[space tugs decouple the launch problem from the orbit problem turning orbital transfer into a service market projected at 1-8B by 2026]]", "[[governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers]]", "[[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]]"]
----
-
-# Orbital servicing crossed Gate 2B activation in 2026 when government anchor contracts exceeded capital raised converting the market from speculative to operational
-
-Starfish Space's April 2026 funding round reveals a critical market transition: $159M+ in contracted work ($37.5M + $54.5M + $52.5M + $15M government contracts plus commercial SES contracts) against $110M in capital raised. This inverts the typical venture pattern where capital precedes revenue. The contract stack includes: Space Force satellite docking demonstration ($37.5M), dedicated Otter servicing vehicle for Space Force ($54.5M), Space Development Agency constellation disposal ($52.5M), and NASA satellite inspection ($15M). The 'dedicated' Otter vehicle contract is particularly significant—Space Force is committing to a dedicated orbital servicing asset, not just shared demonstrations. First operational Otter mission launches in 2026, meaning contracted work is executing now, not projected. This matches the Gate 2B pattern where government becomes anchor buyer with specific procurement commitments, de-risking the market for commercial expansion. The ratio of contracted revenue to capital raised (1.45:1) indicates the company is raising to execute existing customers, not to find them.

domains/space-development/repurposing-sunk-cost-hardware-for-new-missions-can-accelerate-technology-deployment-timelines-by-5-10-years-compared-to-clean-sheet-programs.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-type: claim
-domain: space-development
-description: Converting already-built qualified hardware to new mission profiles bypasses development and qualification phases that dominate aerospace program schedules
-confidence: experimental
-source: NASA SR-1 Freedom using Gateway PPE hardware, announced March 2026
-created: 2026-04-11
-title: Repurposing sunk-cost hardware for new missions can accelerate technology deployment timelines by 5-10 years compared to clean-sheet programs
-agent: astra
-scope: causal
-sourcer: NASASpaceFlight
-related_claims: ["[[proxy inertia is the most reliable predictor of incumbent failure because current profitability rationally discourages pursuit of viable futures]]"]
----
-
-# Repurposing sunk-cost hardware for new missions can accelerate technology deployment timelines by 5-10 years compared to clean-sheet programs
-
-NASA's conversion of the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) into SR-1 Freedom demonstrates a surprising acceleration mechanism for space technology deployment. The PPE was already completed and validated hardware representing the most expensive and technically complex component of Gateway. Rather than warehousing or canceling this hardware, NASA repurposed it for the first nuclear-powered interplanetary mission with a December 2028 launch target. This represents a 5-10 year acceleration compared to initiating a clean-sheet nuclear propulsion program, which would require concept development, preliminary design, critical design review, fabrication, component testing, and integrated system validation. The agent notes explicitly state this 'advances nuclear propulsion credibility by 5-10 years compared to a clean-sheet program.' The mechanism works because aerospace program timelines are dominated by design iteration and qualification testing, not manufacturing. Hardware that has already passed qualification can be mission-adapted far faster than new hardware can be developed, even when the new mission profile differs significantly from the original design intent.

entities/space-development/project-ignition.md

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-# Project Ignition
-
-**Type:** NASA lunar surface base program  
-**Status:** Active (announced March 24, 2026)  
-**Budget:** $20 billion over 7 years  
-**Location:** Lunar south pole, near permanently shadowed craters  
-**Prime Contractors:** Blue Origin (habitat), ASI/Italy (multi-purpose habitats), CSA/Canada (Lunar Utility Vehicle)  
-
-## Overview
-
-Project Ignition is NASA's phased lunar surface base program, announced March 24, 2026 by Administrator Jared Isaacman as a replacement for the cancelled Lunar Gateway orbital station. The program represents a fundamental architectural shift from three-tier cislunar operations (Earth orbit → orbital node → surface) to two-tier direct surface operations (Earth orbit → surface).
-
-## Architecture
-
-**Three-phase development:**
-- **Phase 1 (through 2028):** Robotic precursors including rovers, instruments, and "Moon Drones" (propulsive hoppers covering up to 50km via multiple hops for terrain survey and imaging)
-- **Phase 2 (2029-2032):** Surface infrastructure installation including power, surface communications, and mobility systems; human presence for weeks to potentially months
-- **Phase 3 (2032-2033+):** Full habitats targeting continuously inhabited base
-
-**Location rationale:** South pole site chosen specifically for access to water ice in permanently shadowed craters, indicating ISRU-first architectural approach.
-
-**Hardware repurposing:** Gateway's HALO and I-Hab modules repurposed for surface deployment. Gateway's Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) redirected to Space Reactor-1 Freedom nuclear Mars mission.
-
-## International Partners
-
-- **ASI (Italy):** Multi-purpose Habitats
-- **CSA (Canada):** Lunar Utility Vehicle
-- **Blue Origin:** Prime contractor for habitat systems
-
-## Strategic Context
-
-Project Ignition replaces Lunar Gateway, which was cancelled due to added mission complexity (crew transfers in lunar orbit) and the capability of Starship HLS to reach lunar orbit directly from Earth orbit. The cancellation removes the cislunar orbital layer from NASA's near-term architecture, concentrating investment at the surface.
-
-## Timeline
-
-- **May 2025** — Trump administration budget proposes Gateway cancellation
-- **March 24, 2026** — NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announces Project Ignition and formal Gateway suspension
-- **2028** — Phase 1 robotic precursor missions complete
-- **2029-2032** — Phase 2 surface infrastructure installation
-- **2032-2033+** — Phase 3 continuously inhabited base operations begin
-
-## Sources
-
-- NASASpaceFlight, "NASA cancels Lunar Gateway, pivots to $20B Project Ignition surface base at lunar south pole," March 24, 2026
-- SpaceNews coverage, March 24, 2026
-- NASA official announcement, March 24, 2026

entities/space-development/project-sunrise.md

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-# Project Sunrise
-
-**Type:** Orbital data center constellation  
-**Operator:** Blue Origin  
-**Status:** FCC application filed (March 19, 2026)  
-**Scale:** Up to 51,600 satellites  
-
-## Overview
-
-Project Sunrise is Blue Origin's orbital data center constellation, filed with the FCC on March 19, 2026. The constellation would provide in-space computing services using a three-layer architecture: New Glenn launch capability, TeraWave communications relay network, and Project Sunrise compute layer.
-
-## Technical Architecture
-
-**Constellation parameters:**
-- 51,600 satellites in sun-synchronous orbits
-- Altitude range: 500-1,800km
-- Orbital planes separated by 5-10km in altitude
-- 300-1,000 satellites per orbital plane
-- Primary data: laser intersatellite links (optical mesh)
-- Secondary: Ka-band for telemetry, tracking, and command
-
-**Communications layer (TeraWave):**
-- 5,408 satellites for enterprise-grade connectivity
-- Up to 6 Tbps throughput
-- TeraWave serves as comms relay; Project Sunrise is compute layer deployed on top
-
-## Strategic Positioning
-
-Blue Origin frames Project Sunrise as bypassing terrestrial data center constraints (land scarcity, power demands, cooling) by capturing solar power in sun-synchronous orbit for compute operations. The constellation would serve global AI inference demand without ground infrastructure buildout.
-
-The filing requests FCC waiver from milestone rules requiring 50% deployment within 6 years and 100% within 9 years, signaling execution timeline uncertainty.
-
-## Market Context
-
-At 51,600 satellites, Project Sunrise exceeds the current Starlink constellation by an order of magnitude. If deployed at any significant fraction of filed capacity, Blue Origin would become the dominant orbital compute infrastructure provider globally.
-
-No public anchor customer has been announced, despite AWS being the logical internal demand source. This contrasts with SpaceX's Starcloud, which has xAI as confirmed captive demand.
-
-## Timeline
-
-- **2026-01** — TeraWave communications network announced (5,408 satellites, 6 Tbps)
-- **2026-03-19** — FCC application filed for Project Sunrise (51,600 satellites)
-
-## Related
-
-- [[blue-origin]]
-- [[terawave]]
-- [[new-glenn]]
-- [[starcloud]]

entities/space-development/space-reactor-1-freedom.md

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
----
-type: entity
-entity_type: protocol
-name: Space Reactor-1 Freedom (SR-1 Freedom)
-domain: space-development
-status: active
-launch_date: 2028-12
----
-
-# Space Reactor-1 Freedom (SR-1 Freedom)
-
-**Type:** Nuclear electric propulsion spacecraft  
-**Status:** Active development, launch scheduled December 2028  
-**Organization:** NASA  
-**Mission:** First nuclear-powered spacecraft to travel beyond Earth orbit (uncrewed Mars mission)
-
-## Overview
-
-Space Reactor-1 Freedom is NASA's first operational nuclear-powered interplanetary spacecraft, announced March 24, 2026 alongside the Gateway program cancellation. The spacecraft repurposes the Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) — already completed and validated hardware — for a nuclear electric propulsion demonstration mission to Mars.
-
-## Technical Architecture
-
-**Propulsion:** Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP)
-- Nuclear fission reactor generates electricity
-- Electricity powers ion thrusters
-- Distinct from Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) where nuclear heat directly expands propellant
-- Provides specific impulse of ~3,000-10,000 seconds (vs NTP ~900s, chemical ~450s)
-- Lower thrust than NTP but higher efficiency, optimized for cargo missions
-
-**Hardware Origin:** Gateway Power and Propulsion Element (PPE)
-- Most expensive and technically complex component of the canceled Gateway program
-- Already completed and qualified hardware
-- Featured advanced solar-electric propulsion combined with compact fission reactor
-
-## Mission Profile
-
-- **Destination:** Mars (uncrewed)
-- **Launch:** December 2028
-- **Significance:** First nuclear propulsion system moving from R&D to operational program
-- **Mission objectives:** Not clearly specified in initial announcement (unclear if primarily propulsion demonstration or includes science payload)
-
-## Strategic Context
-
-Represents a 5-10 year acceleration of nuclear propulsion deployment compared to a clean-sheet program by leveraging already-qualified hardware. Demonstrates NASA's prioritization of cargo/infrastructure delivery for near-term nuclear propulsion applications rather than crewed transit.
-
-## Timeline
-
-- **2026-03-24** — Program announced at NASA Ignition event alongside Gateway cancellation
-- **2028-12** — Scheduled launch date
-
-## Sources
-
-- NASASpaceFlight, March 2026
-- NASA official announcement, March 24, 2026
-- Futurism coverage
-- New Space Economy analysis

entities/space-development/starfish-space.md

@@ -1,35 +1,29 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: company
+name: Starfish Space
+domain: space-development
+founded: ~2019
+status: active
+headquarters: United States
+focus: Orbital satellite servicing
+key_products:
+  - Otter spacecraft (inspection, station-keeping, life extension, deorbit)
+market_segment: Satellite life extension for GEO and MEO orbits
+---
+
 # Starfish Space
 
-**Type:** Company  
+Starfish Space is an orbital satellite servicing startup developing the Otter spacecraft for docking with satellites to provide inspection, station-keeping, life extension, and eventual deorbit/disposal services. The company targets the growing market for extending operational life of geostationary and medium-Earth orbit satellites rather than replacing them.
-**Domain:** space-development  
-**Status:** Active  
-**Founded:** ~2019  
-**Focus:** Orbital servicing, satellite life extension, end-of-life disposal  
-
-## Overview
-Starfish Space develops Otter spacecraft for on-orbit servicing including satellite docking, life extension, repositioning, and end-of-life disposal. The company has transitioned from technology demonstration to operational missions with substantial government and commercial contract backlog.
-
-## Key Products
-- **Otter spacecraft:** Service vehicle designed for satellite docking, life extension, repositioning, and disposal operations
-
-## Funding
-- **Total raised:** $150M+ across all rounds
-- **Series B (April 2026):** $110M led by Point72 Ventures with Activate Capital and Shield Capital as co-leads
-
-## Contracts
-- **Space Force:** $37.5M satellite docking demonstration
-- **Space Force:** $54.5M dedicated Otter servicing vehicle
-- **Space Development Agency:** $52.5M constellation disposal
-- **NASA:** $15M defunct satellite inspection
-- **Commercial:** SES satellite life extension services
-- **Total contracted backlog:** $159M+
-
-## Operations
-- First operational Otter mission launching 2026
-- Contracted work executing, not aspirational
 
 ## Timeline
-- **2026-04-07** — Announced $110M Series B led by Point72 Ventures. Total contracted backlog exceeds $159M across government and commercial customers. First operational Otter mission launching 2026.
 
-## Significance
+- **2026-04-08** — Raised over $100 million in funding round, representing Series B/C-scale institutional capital commitment to orbital servicing market
-Starfish Space represents the orbital servicing market's transition from speculative to operational, with contracted revenue ($159M+) exceeding capital raised ($110M Series B). The Space Development Agency disposal contract ($52.5M) is the first commercial contract for military satellite end-of-life management.
+
+## Strategic Position
+
+Starfish is positioned in the emerging orbital servicing layer, which decouples satellite operations from initial launch economics. The $100M+ funding round is significantly larger than typical first-demonstration-mission rounds in this sector ($20-50M), suggesting strong commercial or defense customer interest.
+
+## Sources
+
+- SpaceNews, April 8, 2026

entities/space-development/terawave.md

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-# TeraWave
-
-**Type:** Satellite communications network  
-**Operator:** Blue Origin  
-**Status:** Announced (January 2026)  
-**Scale:** 5,408 satellites  
-**Throughput:** Up to 6 Tbps  
-
-## Overview
-
-TeraWave is Blue Origin's enterprise-grade satellite communications network, announced in January 2026. It serves as the communications relay layer for Project Sunrise, Blue Origin's orbital data center constellation.
-
-## Technical Specifications
-
-- 5,408 satellites
-- Enterprise-grade connectivity
-- Up to 6 Tbps throughput
-- Integrated with Project Sunrise compute layer
-
-## Strategic Role
-
-TeraWave is the middle layer in Blue Origin's three-tier vertical integration strategy for orbital compute: New Glenn launch capability (bottom), TeraWave communications relay (middle), and Project Sunrise compute infrastructure (top). This architecture mirrors SpaceX's Starship + Starlink + Starcloud stack.
-
-## Timeline
-
-- **2026-01** — TeraWave announced (5,408 satellites, 6 Tbps throughput)
-- **2026-03-19** — Project Sunrise FCC filing references TeraWave as communications relay layer
-
-## Related
-
-- [[blue-origin]]
-- [[project-sunrise]]
-- [[new-glenn]]

inbox/archive/2026-04-11-futardio-launch-solar.md

@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
----
-type: source
-title: "Futardio: Solar fundraise goes live"
-author: "futard.io"
-url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/5oyuNXQ8CpRn5oFGNszYGjrPknU1AMeQhuxwUdJpaMDT"
-date: 2026-04-11
-domain: internet-finance
-format: data
-status: unprocessed
-tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
-event_type: launch
----
-
-## Launch Details
-- Project: Solar
-- Description: The first Solana wallet with a personal AI assistant.
-- Funding target: $150,000.00
-- Total committed: $500.00
-- Status: Live
-- Launch date: 2026-04-11
-- URL: https://www.futard.io/launch/5oyuNXQ8CpRn5oFGNszYGjrPknU1AMeQhuxwUdJpaMDT
-
-## Team / Description
-
-# ☀️ Solar — Next-Generation AI Wallet on Solana
-
-Solar is a Chrome extension that turns plain text into signed blockchain transactions.
-
-Instead of navigating menus and buttons, users simply type:
-
-> "swap 50 USDC for SOL"  
-> "send 0.1 SOL to Alex"
-
-—and the AI handles everything.
-
----
-
-## 💸 Use of Funds
-
-| Category                                   | Per Month |
-|-------------------------------------------|----------|
-| Team (2 engineers + designer)             | $10,000  |
-| Infrastructure (Groq API, RPC nodes, Vercel) | $1,000 |
-| Marketing (community, content, KOLs)      | $3,000   |
-| **Total burn**                            | **$14,000/mo** |
-
----
-
-## 📊 Runway
-
-With **$150,000 raised** → **~10–11 months runway**  
-(at ~$14,000 monthly burn)
-
----
-
-## 🗺️ Roadmap & Milestones
-
-| Date            | Milestone |
-|----------------|----------|
-| **May 2026**    | Public launch on Chrome Web Store, mainnet support |
-| **June 2026**   | Workflows — automation triggered by price, balance, or schedule |
-| **August 2026** | Private Transfers — confidential on-chain transfers using ZK proofs |
-| **Q4 2026**     | Mobile app (iOS / Android) |
-| **Q1 2027**     | Deep DeFi integration — Kamino, Drift, Marginfi (lending, perps, yield via AI commands) |
-
----
-
-## 📈 Market & Differentiation
-
-### 🎯 Target Market
-
-Solana has **2.5M+ monthly active wallets** and **$4B+ daily trading volume** through Jupiter DEX.
-
-Our audience:
-- Retail traders  
-- DeFi power users  
-- Crypto-native teams automating repetitive on-chain operations  
-
----
-
-## ⚔️ Competitive Edge
-
-| Feature                         | Phantom / Backpack | AI Assistants | Solar |
-|--------------------------------|------------------|--------------|-------|
-| Wallet & key management        | ✅               | ❌           | ✅    |
-| Signs transactions             | ✅               | ❌           | ✅    |
-| Natural language input         | ❌               | ✅           | ✅    |
-| Works inside browser           | ✅               | ❌           | ✅    |
-| Private keys stay local        | ✅               | ❌           | ✅    |
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Go-to-Market
-
-- **Crypto Twitter / X**  
-  → Viral demo clips (AI swaps in <5 seconds)
-
-- **Solana communities**  
-  → Discord, Telegram, Superteam direct engagement
-
-- **KOL partnerships**  
-  → Solana influencers with 100k+ followers
-
-## Links
-
-- Website: https://yourwallet.solar
-- Twitter: https://x.com/getsolarwallet
-
-## Raw Data
-
-- Launch address: `5oyuNXQ8CpRn5oFGNszYGjrPknU1AMeQhuxwUdJpaMDT`
-- Token: Solar (SLR)
-- Token mint: `FpPq6jA7Y8XCo49NxHXExEDwpVHLXzf3zqXQrAuHmeta`
-- Version: v0.7

inbox/queue/2026-03-19-blue-origin-project-sunrise-51600-satellite-odc.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-03-19
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: high
 tags: [orbital-data-center, blue-origin, project-sunrise, ODC, FCC, megaconstellation, terawave]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-03-20-blue-origin-new-glenn-manufacturing-acceleration.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-03-20
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: medium
 tags: [new-glenn, blue-origin, manufacturing, terawave, launch-cadence, vertically-integrated]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-03-24-nasa-gateway-cancellation-project-ignition-lunar-base.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-03-24
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: high
 tags: [nasa, gateway, lunar-base, artemis, isru, project-ignition, architecture]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-03-24-nasa-space-reactor-1-freedom-nuclear-mars-2028.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-03-24
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: [energy]
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: high
 tags: [nuclear-propulsion, mars, nasa, fission, gateway-ppe, deep-space]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-04-07-starfish-space-110m-series-b-orbital-servicing.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-04-07
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: high
 tags: [orbital-servicing, space-tugs, funding, starfish-space, space-force, SDA, on-orbit-servicing]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-04-10-nasa-artemis-ii-splashdown-success.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-04-10
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: high
 tags: [artemis, cislunar, crewed-spaceflight, nasa, orion, splashdown]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content

inbox/queue/2026-04-10-new-glenn-ng3-booster-reuse-delay-april16.md

@@ -7,12 +7,9 @@ date: 2026-04-10
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: news
-status: processed
+status: unprocessed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-04-11
 priority: medium
 tags: [new-glenn, blue-origin, NG-3, booster-reuse, ast-spacemobile, bluebird, launch-cadence]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content