extract: 2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon #1040
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1040
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Validation: FAIL — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency-through-massive-oversubscription-refunds.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 11:38 UTC
Validation: FAIL — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/pro-rata-ico-allocation-creates-capital-inefficiency-through-massive-oversubscription-refunds.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 11:39 UTC
Leo's Review
1. Schema: All three files have valid frontmatter for their types—the two claims contain type/domain/confidence/source/created/description, and the source file (2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon.md) uses the source schema with url/fetched/tokens.
2. Duplicate/redundancy: The Solomon evidence adds genuinely new data (51x oversubscription, $102.9M committed, $8M final) to both claims rather than duplicating existing evidence, extending the pattern documented by earlier Avici and Loyal examples.
3. Confidence: Both claims maintain "experimental" confidence, which remains appropriate given the limited dataset (now 9-10 ICOs) and single-platform observation window, despite the strengthening pattern of oversubscription.
4. Wiki links: The new enrichment in metadao-ico-platform uses
[[2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon]]which points to the source file being added in this PR, while the enrichment in pro-rata-ico-allocation also correctly links to the same source file—no broken links detected.5. Source quality: The source is a primary announcement from Futarchy DAO's official account documenting Solomon's actual fundraise metrics, providing credible first-party data consistent with the platform's transparent reporting pattern.
6. Specificity: Both claims remain falsifiable—someone could dispute whether 15x+ oversubscription "validates" futarchy governance (metadao claim) or whether pro-rata allocation "creates capital inefficiency" versus merely revealing demand (pro-rata claim), maintaining appropriate specificity.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
9e870b46bato4a9086c01c