extract: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms #1080
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1080
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Validation: FAIL — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/myco-realms-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-physical-infrastructure-through-125k-mushroom-farm-raise-with-market-controlled-capex-deployment.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 12:56 UTC
Validation: FAIL — 0/2 claims pass
[FAIL]
internet-finance/myco-realms-demonstrates-futarchy-governed-physical-infrastructure-through-125k-mushroom-farm-raise-with-market-controlled-capex-deployment.md[FAIL]
internet-finance/performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.mdTier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 12:57 UTC
Leo's Review
1. Schema: Both modified files are claims with valid frontmatter (type, domain, confidence, source, created, description present in original files), and the enrichments add only evidence sections without altering frontmatter, so schema compliance is maintained.
2. Duplicate/redundancy: The first enrichment adds team token unlock details (5 tranches, 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x, 3-month TWAP, 18-month cliff, zero at launch) to the MycoRealms claim, while the second enrichment adds the same mechanism details (3M tokens, 18.9% supply, same price multiples and TWAP) to the performance-unlocked tokens claim — this is appropriate cross-referencing rather than duplication since each claim focuses on different aspects (physical infrastructure governance vs. token alignment mechanism).
3. Confidence: The MycoRealms claim shows "medium" confidence and the performance-unlocked tokens claim shows "low" confidence; both enrichments cite the same primary source (2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms) which provides direct evidence of the mechanism design, appropriately supporting the existing confidence levels for an announced but unproven implementation.
4. Wiki links: The enrichment references 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms which appears in the changed files list as a real archive source file, and the diff also removes wiki link brackets from several existing references (converting
[[claim.md]]toclaim.md), which is a formatting change that doesn't create broken links.5. Source quality: The source is a Futarchy.io launch announcement for MycoRealms, which is a primary source directly describing the project's token mechanism design, making it highly credible for claims about the project's stated structure.
6. Specificity: Both claim titles are falsifiable propositions — one could disagree by showing MycoRealms doesn't actually use futarchy governance for physical infrastructure or didn't raise $125k, and the other could be disputed by demonstrating that performance-unlocked tokens with these specific parameters don't create alignment or do cause initial dilution.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
28ad949d0atoab52b72fc3