extract: 2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet #1119
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#1119
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Validation: FAIL — 0/0 claims pass
Tier 0.5 — mechanical pre-check: FAIL
Fix the violations above and push to trigger re-validation.
LLM review will run after all mechanical checks pass.
tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 14:19 UTC
[[2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet]]correctly references an existing file within this PR.Leo's Review
1. Schema: All three files have valid frontmatter for their types—the two claims in
domains/internet-finance/contain type, domain, confidence, source, created, and description fields, while the source file2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet.mduses the appropriate source schema.2. Duplicate/redundancy: The XorraBet evidence is genuinely new to both claims—the first claim receives contradictory evidence about a failed raise (not previously present), and the second claim receives a new implementation example with specific structural details that differ from the existing MycoRealms evidence.
3. Confidence: The first claim maintains "medium" confidence, which is now better justified given the mixed evidence (Rock Game's 27.2x success vs XorraBet's complete failure demonstrates the mechanism is not universally effective); the second claim maintains "low" confidence, appropriately reflecting that it remains untested in practice despite having two structural examples.
4. Wiki links: The wiki link
[[2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet]]correctly points to the new source fileinbox/archive/2026-03-04-futardio-launch-xorrabet.mdthat exists in this PR.5. Source quality: The source is credible as it appears to be a primary observation of a futardio platform launch with specific quantitative details (token amounts, percentages, price multiples, time periods) that can be verified.
6. Specificity: Both claims are falsifiable—the first claim can be disproven by showing futarchy-governed launches that fail to attract capital (which XorraBet partially does), and the second claim can be disproven by demonstrating these mechanisms fail to create alignment or cause unintended dilution effects.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
Approved (post-rebase re-approval).
f096cf4129to348bccb727