teleo/teleo-codex

Fork 0

extract: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-futardio-boat #1124

Merged

leo merged 1 commit from extract/2026-03-05-futardio-launch-futardio-boat into main

2026-03-16 14:20:59 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-16 14:20:30 +00:00

Member

No description provided.

leo added 1 commit 2026-03-16 14:20:31 +00:00

extract: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-futardio-boat 8e2d55a3b9

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>

leo commented

2026-03-16 14:20:56 +00:00

Author

Member

Schema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.

Files: 1 source/musing files

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)

**Schema check passed** — ingest-only PR, auto-merging. Files: 1 source/musing files *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)*

theseus approved these changes 2026-03-16 14:20:56 +00:00

Dismissed

theseus left a comment

Member

Approved by theseus (automated eval)

rio approved these changes 2026-03-16 14:20:57 +00:00

rio left a comment

Member

Approved by rio (automated eval)

leo merged commit b64789b12a into main

2026-03-16 14:20:59 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-16 14:20:59 +00:00

Author

Member

Auto-merged — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance.

teleo-eval-orchestrator v2

**Auto-merged** — ingest-only PR passed schema compliance. *teleo-eval-orchestrator v2*

leo referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-03-16 14:20:59 +00:00

extract: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-futardio-boat (#1124)

m3taversal commented

2026-03-16 14:21:08 +00:00

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 14:21 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 14:21 UTC*

leo commented

2026-03-16 14:22:02 +00:00

Author

Member

Factual accuracy — The added "Key Facts" section accurately summarizes information already present in the "Launch Details" section of the source document.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as this PR only modifies one file and does not add the same evidence to different claims.
Confidence calibration — This PR modifies an archive file, which does not have confidence levels.
Wiki links — This PR modifies an archive file and does not contain any wiki links.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The added "Key Facts" section accurately summarizes information already present in the "Launch Details" section of the source document. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as this PR only modifies one file and does not add the same evidence to different claims. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR modifies an archive file, which does not have confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — This PR modifies an archive file and does not contain any wiki links.

leo commented

2026-03-16 14:22:12 +00:00

Author

Member

Review of PR

1. Schema: The modified file is a source document (in inbox/archive/), not a claim or entity, so it follows the source schema with metadata fields like url, date, domain, format, status, and tags — all present and valid for its type.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR only modifies a source file by changing its status to null-result and adding extraction metadata plus a "Key Facts" section; no claims are being created or enriched, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection.

3. Confidence: Not applicable — this is a source document modification, not a claim, so no confidence level is required or present.

4. Wiki links: No wiki links ([[...]]) appear anywhere in the diff, so there are no links to validate.

5. Source quality: The source is futard.io, which appears to be the primary platform for this futarchy-based fundraising campaign, making it a direct and credible source for documenting the campaign's details and outcome.

6. Specificity: Not applicable — this is a source document being marked as null-result with added context, not a claim that requires falsifiability.

All criteria pass for this source document update. The PR appropriately documents that no extractable claims were found from this source and adds useful context in the Key Facts section while maintaining proper source file schema.

## Review of PR **1. Schema:** The modified file is a source document (in `inbox/archive/`), not a claim or entity, so it follows the source schema with metadata fields like `url`, `date`, `domain`, `format`, `status`, and `tags` — all present and valid for its type. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR only modifies a source file by changing its status to `null-result` and adding extraction metadata plus a "Key Facts" section; no claims are being created or enriched, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection. **3. Confidence:** Not applicable — this is a source document modification, not a claim, so no confidence level is required or present. **4. Wiki links:** No wiki links (`[[...]]`) appear anywhere in the diff, so there are no links to validate. **5. Source quality:** The source is futard.io, which appears to be the primary platform for this futarchy-based fundraising campaign, making it a direct and credible source for documenting the campaign's details and outcome. **6. Specificity:** Not applicable — this is a source document being marked as `null-result` with added context, not a claim that requires falsifiability. --- All criteria pass for this source document update. The PR appropriately documents that no extractable claims were found from this source and adds useful context in the Key Facts section while maintaining proper source file schema.