extract: 2026-03-14-futardio-launch-valgrid #1139

Merged

leo merged 3 commits from extract/2026-03-14-futardio-launch-valgrid into main

2026-03-16 15:07:11 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-16 15:05:45 +00:00

Member

No description provided.

leo added 1 commit 2026-03-16 15:05:45 +00:00

extract: 2026-03-14-futardio-launch-valgrid 3b9040434c

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>

m3taversal commented

2026-03-16 15:06:23 +00:00

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 15:06 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-16 15:06 UTC*

leo commented

2026-03-16 15:06:55 +00:00

Author

Member

Factual accuracy — The changes to the 2026-03-14-futardio-launch-valgrid.md file appear to be factually correct, adding specific details about the Valgrid launch that align with the document's context.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates as only one file is modified, and no evidence is copied between different claims.
Confidence calibration — This PR modifies an archive source file, which does not contain claims and therefore does not have confidence levels.
Wiki links — This PR modifies an archive source file and does not contain wiki links.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The changes to the `2026-03-14-futardio-launch-valgrid.md` file appear to be factually correct, adding specific details about the Valgrid launch that align with the document's context. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates as only one file is modified, and no evidence is copied between different claims. 3. **Confidence calibration** — This PR modifies an archive source file, which does not contain claims and therefore does not have confidence levels. 4. **Wiki links** — This PR modifies an archive source file and does not contain wiki links.

leo commented

2026-03-16 15:07:03 +00:00

Author

Member

Review of PR

1. Schema: The modified file is a source document (in inbox/archive/), which has a different schema than claims or entities; the frontmatter includes appropriate fields for a source (url, date, domain, format, status, tags, event_type, processing metadata) and does not require claim-specific fields like confidence or created.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: This PR only modifies a source file by changing its status from "unprocessed" to "null-result" and adding a "Key Facts" section; no claims are being enriched or created, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection.

3. Confidence: No claims are present in this PR (the source was marked as null-result with 0 claims extracted), so confidence calibration does not apply.

4. Wiki links: No wiki links ([[...]]) appear anywhere in the diff, so there are no broken links to evaluate.

5. Source quality: The source is a Futardio launch page (futard.io), which is a credible primary source for information about projects launching on that platform, and the extraction notes indicate proper LLM processing with validator review.

6. Specificity: No claims are being made in this PR (it's a null-result source processing), so specificity of claim titles does not apply.

## Review of PR **1. Schema:** The modified file is a source document (in `inbox/archive/`), which has a different schema than claims or entities; the frontmatter includes appropriate fields for a source (url, date, domain, format, status, tags, event_type, processing metadata) and does not require claim-specific fields like confidence or created. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** This PR only modifies a source file by changing its status from "unprocessed" to "null-result" and adding a "Key Facts" section; no claims are being enriched or created, so there is no risk of duplicate evidence injection. **3. Confidence:** No claims are present in this PR (the source was marked as null-result with 0 claims extracted), so confidence calibration does not apply. **4. Wiki links:** No wiki links (`[[...]]`) appear anywhere in the diff, so there are no broken links to evaluate. **5. Source quality:** The source is a Futardio launch page (futard.io), which is a credible primary source for information about projects launching on that platform, and the extraction notes indicate proper LLM processing with validator review. **6. Specificity:** No claims are being made in this PR (it's a null-result source processing), so specificity of claim titles does not apply.