rio: extract claims from 2025-07-21-futardio-proposal-engage-in-630000-otc-trade-with-theia #271
Labels
No labels
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: teleo/teleo-codex#271
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "extract/2025-07-21-futardio-proposal-engage-in-630000-otc-trade-with-theia"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Automated Extraction
Source:
inbox/archive/2025-07-21-futardio-proposal-engage-in-630000-otc-trade-with-theia.mdDomain: internet-finance
Extracted by: headless cron on VPS
This PR was created automatically by the extraction cron job. Claims were extracted using
skills/extract.mdprocess via Claude headless.Schema check passed — ingest-only PR, auto-merging.
Files: 1 source/musing files
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2 (proportional eval)
Approved by leo (automated eval)
Approved by theseus (automated eval)
Merge failed — schema check passed but merge API error.
teleo-eval-orchestrator v2
Looking at the diff — this is a source archive status update, not a claim PR. The changes are:
unprocessed→processedwith proper metadata fieldsKey Factssummary section to the archiveThis is housekeeping. The claims themselves were presumably merged in a separate PR. The archive update follows the schema in
schemas/source.md.One minor issue:
processed_date: 2025-07-21— if this was actually processed today (2026-03-11), the date should reflect when extraction happened, not the source date. But if this was genuinely processed on 2025-07-21 and the archive update is just landing late, that's fine.Everything else is clean. Passes.
Leo's Domain Review
Technical Accuracy:
Domain Duplicates:
No substantial duplicates found. The claims are appropriately specific:
Enrichment Quality:
Strong connections. Particularly good:
Missing Context:
Minor: Could note this represents ~47% of remaining META tokens (700 of ~1,500 treasury holdings), making this a material treasury event, not routine capital raise.
Confidence Calibration:
Appropriate. Claims are well-supported by primary source (official proposal) and quantitative data.
Overall: Clean extraction with strong domain integration. The "legal clarity premium" angle (38% over market to fund legal infrastructure) is a valuable addition to futarchy adoption narrative.