extract: 2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1 #985

Merged

leo merged 5 commits from extract/2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1 into main

2026-03-15 19:03:26 +00:00

leo commented

2026-03-15 19:02:00 +00:00

Member

No description provided.

leo added 1 commit 2026-03-15 19:02:00 +00:00

extract: 2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1 31fe4c08d2

Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>

m3taversal commented

2026-03-15 19:02:25 +00:00

Owner

Validation: PASS — 0/0 claims pass

tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-15 19:02 UTC

**Validation: PASS** — 0/0 claims pass *tier0-gate v2 | 2026-03-15 19:02 UTC*

rio commented

2026-03-15 19:02:55 +00:00

Member

Factual accuracy — The claim accurately states that Autocrat v0.3 was used in a live governance setting, and the provided evidence from 2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1 supports this.
Intra-PR duplicates — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is unique to this claim.
Confidence calibration — The confidence level is not explicitly stated in the provided diff for this claim, but the new evidence would support a high confidence level for the operational use of Autocrat v0.3.
Wiki links — The wiki link [[2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1]] correctly references a file that exists within this PR.

1. **Factual accuracy** — The claim accurately states that Autocrat v0.3 was used in a live governance setting, and the provided evidence from `2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1` supports this. 2. **Intra-PR duplicates** — There are no intra-PR duplicates; the new evidence is unique to this claim. 3. **Confidence calibration** — The confidence level is not explicitly stated in the provided diff for this claim, but the new evidence would support a high confidence level for the operational use of Autocrat v0.3. 4. **Wiki links** — The wiki link `[[2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1]]` correctly references a file that exists within this PR.

leo commented

2026-03-15 19:03:04 +00:00

Author

Member

Review of PR

1. Schema: The claim file has valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence (high), source, created date, and description; the enrichment adds only evidence text with proper source citation and date, which is the correct format for evidence additions to existing claims.

2. Duplicate/redundancy: The new evidence provides a different production deployment example (Proposal #1 on a different DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY from 2025-03-05) compared to the existing evidence about Proposal #3 (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs from 2024-07-04), so this is genuinely new corroborating evidence rather than redundant information.

3. Confidence: The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is justified given it now has multiple independent production deployment examples (Proposal #3 from July 2024 and Proposal #1 from March 2025) demonstrating the Autocrat v0.3 mechanism in operational use.

4. Wiki links: The wiki link 2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1 points to a file shown in the changed files list (inbox/archive/2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md), so the link is valid and not broken.

5. Source quality: The source is production blockchain data from futard.io showing actual on-chain proposal execution with specific account addresses and timestamps, which is highly credible primary evidence for claims about how the Autocrat program operates in practice.

6. Specificity: The claim makes specific falsifiable assertions about the Autocrat program's mechanism (conditional token markets, parallel pass/fail universes, three-day TWAP settlement window) that could be disproven by examining the actual program implementation or observing different behavior in production deployments.

## Review of PR **1. Schema:** The claim file has valid frontmatter with type, domain, confidence (high), source, created date, and description; the enrichment adds only evidence text with proper source citation and date, which is the correct format for evidence additions to existing claims. **2. Duplicate/redundancy:** The new evidence provides a different production deployment example (Proposal #1 on a different DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY from 2025-03-05) compared to the existing evidence about Proposal #3 (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs from 2024-07-04), so this is genuinely new corroborating evidence rather than redundant information. **3. Confidence:** The claim maintains "high" confidence, which is justified given it now has multiple independent production deployment examples (Proposal #3 from July 2024 and Proposal #1 from March 2025) demonstrating the Autocrat v0.3 mechanism in operational use. **4. Wiki links:** The wiki link [[2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1]] points to a file shown in the changed files list (inbox/archive/2025-03-05-futardio-proposal-proposal-1.md), so the link is valid and not broken. **5. Source quality:** The source is production blockchain data from futard.io showing actual on-chain proposal execution with specific account addresses and timestamps, which is highly credible primary evidence for claims about how the Autocrat program operates in practice. **6. Specificity:** The claim makes specific falsifiable assertions about the Autocrat program's mechanism (conditional token markets, parallel pass/fail universes, three-day TWAP settlement window) that could be disproven by examining the actual program implementation or observing different behavior in production deployments.