From 02a2e8bc6b4a146128ed378b2c8c7e04e032529c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 19:33:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] extract: 2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...an-impossibility-machine-intelligence.json | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ ...wian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md | 13 ++++++- 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.json diff --git a/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.json b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..dc2d59ea --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.json @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +{ + "rejected_claims": [ + { + "filename": "arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md", + "issues": [ + "no_frontmatter" + ] + }, + { + "filename": "convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md", + "issues": [ + "no_frontmatter" + ] + } + ], + "validation_stats": { + "total": 2, + "kept": 0, + "fixed": 4, + "rejected": 2, + "fixes_applied": [ + "arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:set_created:2026-03-15", + "arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr", + "convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:set_created:2026-03-15", + "convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr" + ], + "rejections": [ + "arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-machine-intelligence-measurement-not-just-preference-aggregation.md:no_frontmatter", + "convergent-impossibility-across-four-mathematical-traditions-suggests-structural-limits-not-contingent-failures.md:no_frontmatter" + ] + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5", + "date": "2026-03-15" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md index 3b40647a..8fe5bf60 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md @@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-08-07 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [critical-systems] format: paper -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: high tags: [arrows-theorem, machine-intelligence, impossibility, Legg-Hutter, Chollet-ARC, formal-proof] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-15 +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator" --- ## Content @@ -41,3 +45,10 @@ No agent-environment-based MIM simultaneously satisfies analogs of Arrow's fairn PRIMARY CONNECTION: universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective WHY ARCHIVED: Fourth independent impossibility tradition — extends Arrow's theorem from alignment to intelligence measurement itself EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the extension from preference aggregation to intelligence measurement and what this means for alignment targets + + +## Key Facts +- Oswald, Ferguson & Bringsjord published formal proof at AGI 2025 (Conference on Artificial General Intelligence) +- Paper appears in Springer LNCS vol. 16058 +- Proof covers Legg-Hutter Intelligence and Chollet's Intelligence Measure (ARC) +- Full paper is paywalled at Springer -- 2.45.2 From b844ffffa75af34822ee760b5dcf10d695c8ef02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 19:33:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] extract: 2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...er-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md index 9c6b07a4..cf58a38f 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2025-08-20-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-offer-investors-early-unlocks-of-their-cloud.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6C date: 2025-08-20 domain: internet-finance format: data -status: unprocessed +status: null-result tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance] event_type: proposal processed_by: rio @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ processed_date: 2026-03-11 enrichments_applied: ["time-based-token-vesting-is-hedgeable-making-standard-lockups-meaningless-as-alignment-mechanisms-because-investors-can-short-sell-to-neutralize-lockup-exposure-while-appearing-locked.md", "MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"] extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" extraction_notes: "No new claims extracted. Source provides concrete example of forfeit-for-liquidity mechanism as alternative to vesting hedgeability, and additional data point on futarchy adoption friction and low-volume uncontested decisions. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and enriched three existing claims with mechanism design insights and futarchy implementation patterns." +processed_by: rio +processed_date: 2026-03-15 +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator" --- ## Proposal Details @@ -83,3 +87,14 @@ Read the full proposal here https://research.sanctum.so/t/cloud-005-should-sanct - Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months - Used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3 - DAO account: GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov + + +## Key Facts +- Sanctum proposal C61vTUyxTq5SWwbrTFEyYeXpGQLKhRRvRrGsu6YUa6CX failed on 2025-08-23 +- Proposal used MetaDAO Autocrat v0.3 +- 9% of CLOUD token supply was unlocking monthly over 24 months from investors +- Proposal offered 35% forfeit rate for immediate unlock +- Potential increase of up to 27 million CLOUD to Team Reserve if all investors opted in +- Team committed not to redistribute forfeited tokens for 24 months +- DAO account: GVmi7ngRAVsUHh8REhKDsB2yNftJTNRt5qMLHDDCizov +- Proposer account: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2 -- 2.45.2