domains/space-development/space governance gaps are widening not narrowing because technology advances exponentially while institutional design advances linearly.md

@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ This pattern — technological capability outpacing institutional design — rec
 
 The governance gap framing assumes governance must precede activity, but historically many governance regimes emerged from practice rather than design — maritime law, internet governance, and aviation regulation all evolved alongside the activities they governed. Counter: the speed differential is qualitatively different for space. Maritime law had centuries to evolve; internet governance emerged over decades but still lags (no global data governance framework exists). Space combines the speed of technology advancement with the lethality of the environment — governance failure in space doesn't produce market inefficiency, it produces Kessler syndrome or lethal infrastructure conflicts. The design window is compressed by the exponential pace of capability development.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-03-00-artemis-program-restructuring]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Artemis III descoped from lunar landing to LEO-only test, pushing human lunar landing to 2028 (56 years after Apollo 17). This represents compounding institutional delays while commercial capabilities (SpaceX Starship/HLS) advance on faster timelines, providing concrete evidence of the widening execution gap.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

domains/space-development/the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system with propellant networks lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partial life support closure.md

@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ The five layers form a chain-link system: propellant depots without ISRU are une
 
 The investment framework this implies: position along the dependency chain that builds toward this attractor state. [[power is the binding constraint on all space operations because every capability from ISRU to manufacturing to life support is power-limited]], making power infrastructure foundational. Water extraction is enabling. Propellant depots are connective. Manufacturing platforms are the value-capture layer.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (challenge)
+*Source: [[2026-03-00-artemis-program-restructuring]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Artemis restructuring pushes first lunar landing to 2028 and reveals that lunar ISRU deployment is blocked by insufficient resource knowledge despite technology being at TRL 5-6. NASA states 'a resilient resource exploration campaign is needed to understand and map lunar water before commercial extraction.' This adds a critical path dependency (resource prospecting) that precedes ISRU infrastructure deployment.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:

inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-03-00-artemis-program-restructuring.json

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "lunar-isru-deployment-blocked-by-resource-knowledge-gap-not-technology-readiness.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "institutional-space-programs-slip-timelines-while-commercial-capabilities-accelerate-creating-widening-execution-gap.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 2,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 2,
+    "rejected": 2,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "lunar-isru-deployment-blocked-by-resource-knowledge-gap-not-technology-readiness.md:set_created:2026-03-16",
+      "institutional-space-programs-slip-timelines-while-commercial-capabilities-accelerate-creating-widening-execution-gap.md:set_created:2026-03-16"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "lunar-isru-deployment-blocked-by-resource-knowledge-gap-not-technology-readiness.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "institutional-space-programs-slip-timelines-while-commercial-capabilities-accelerate-creating-widening-execution-gap.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-16"
+}

inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-03-00-solana-launchpad-competitive-landscape.json

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 1,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 4,
+    "rejected": 1,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md:set_created:2026-03-16",
+      "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand sepa",
+      "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md:stripped_wiki_link:ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protec",
+      "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md:stripped_wiki_link:cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments o"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "curated-launchpads-capture-disproportionate-capital-despite-lower-volume-because-quality-filtering-concentrates-investor-demand.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-16"
+}

inbox/archive/2026-03-00-artemis-program-restructuring.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-03-00
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [artemis, nasa, sls, lunar-landing, isru, timeline-slip, governance-gap]
+processed_by: astra
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system with propellant networks lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partial life support closure.md", "space governance gaps are widening not narrowing because technology advances exponentially while institutional design advances linearly.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -39,3 +43,11 @@ This represents a significant restructuring from earlier plans where Artemis III
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system with propellant networks lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partial life support closure]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Artemis restructuring pushes lunar landing to 2028 and reveals ISRU resource knowledge gap — both affect attractor state timeline
 EXTRACTION HINT: Extract the ISRU resource knowledge gap as a NEW constraint not currently in KB (technology readiness ≠ deployment readiness when you don't know where the resource is)
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Artemis II crew: Wiseman, Glover, Koch (NASA) + Hansen (CSA)
+- Artemis II is a 10-day crewed lunar flyby mission
+- Artemis II rolled back to VAB on February 25, 2026 due to helium flow issue
+- Multiple ISRU prototypes at TRL 5-6: Carbothermal reactor, IPEx excavator, PVEx volatile extractor
+- Artemis V planned for late 2028 as second lunar landing

inbox/archive/2026-03-00-solana-launchpad-competitive-landscape.md

@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-03-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: market-analysis
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: medium
 tags: [solana, launchpads, pump-fun, metadao, capital-formation, token-launches, competitive-landscape]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -52,3 +55,15 @@ MetaDAO and Solanium are positioned as solutions — MetaDAO through futarchy pr
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Competitive landscape data positions MetaDAO's futarchy model against permissionless alternatives — survival rate data is the strongest argument for curation
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the curation vs permissionless spectrum as a market structure claim — what does the 9M tokens / <0.5% survival rate tell us about where value accrues in capital formation?
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Pump.fun generated $700M+ revenue since January 2024
+- Pump.fun launched 11M+ tokens
+- Pump.fun represented 70% of all Solana token launches at peak
+- Pump.fun bonding curve model: 1B tokens per launch, 800M to bonding curve
+- <0.5% of Pump.fun tokens survive 30 days
+- MetaDAO conducted 8 ICOs raising $25.6M with 15x oversubscription
+- Over 9 million tokens were launched on Solana in 2025
+- Bags.fm offers 1% perpetual revenue share on trading volume
+- Magic Eden operates NFT-focused launchpad with high selectivity