theseus: extract claims from 2022-00-00-americanscientist-superorganism-revolution #113
19 changed files with 128 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"raw_response": "{\"claims\": [], \"enrichments\": [{\"target_file\": \"futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md\", \"type\": \"extend\", \"evidence\": \"Futard.io launch data shows first-mover hesitancy as a distinct friction dimension: 'People are reluctant to be the first to put money into these raises' \u2014 deposits follow momentum once someone else commits first. This coordination/liquidity chicken-and-egg problem is separate from token price psychology, proposal complexity, or liquidity requirements already identified in the existing claim.\", \"source_ref\": \"Pine Analytics @PineAnalytics 2026-03-05, Futard.io Launch Metrics\"}, {\"target_file\": \"futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md\", \"type\": \"confirm\", \"evidence\": \"Futard.io (MetaDAO's unbranded arm) launched with 34 ICOs in 2 days, 2 DAOs successfully funded, 5.9% success rate. The brand separation strategy is 'live and functioning \u2014 failed launches don't damage MetaDAO brand.' This validates that brand separation enables permissionless launches while protecting the platform's reputation.\", \"source_ref\": \"Pine Analytics @PineAnalytics 2026-03-05, Futard.io Launch Metrics\"}], \"source_update\": {\"status\": \"enrichment\", \"processed_by\": \"rio\", \"processed_date\": \"2026-03-05\", \"claims_extracted\": [], \"enrichments_applied\": [\"futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md\", \"futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md\"], \"notes\": \"Source contains factual metrics (34 ICOs, $15.6M deposits, 929 wallets, 2 funded, 5.9% success rate) and behavioral observations. The key insight about first-mover hesitancy extends the existing friction claim. The brand separation validation confirms an existing claim. No novel claims meet the specificity threshold \u2014 all insights either map to existing claims or are factual data points.\", \"key_facts\": [\"34 ICOs created in first ~2 days on Futard.io permissionless launch platform\", \"$15.6M in deposits from 929 wallets\", \"2 DAOs reached funding thresholds (5.9% success rate)\", \"Average deposit ~$16.8K per wallet\", \"Comparison: 34 ICOs in 2 days vs 6 curated launches all of Q4 2025\", \"Futard.io is MetaDAO's unbranded arm for open token launches\"]}}",
|
||||
"parsed": {
|
||||
"claims": [],
|
||||
"enrichments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"target_file": "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md",
|
||||
"type": "extend",
|
||||
"evidence": "Futard.io launch data shows first-mover hesitancy as a distinct friction dimension: 'People are reluctant to be the first to put money into these raises' \u2014 deposits follow momentum once someone else commits first. This coordination/liquidity chicken-and-egg problem is separate from token price psychology, proposal complexity, or liquidity requirements already identified in the existing claim.",
|
||||
"source_ref": "Pine Analytics @PineAnalytics 2026-03-05, Futard.io Launch Metrics"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"target_file": "futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md",
|
||||
"type": "confirm",
|
||||
"evidence": "Futard.io (MetaDAO's unbranded arm) launched with 34 ICOs in 2 days, 2 DAOs successfully funded, 5.9% success rate. The brand separation strategy is 'live and functioning \u2014 failed launches don't damage MetaDAO brand.' This validates that brand separation enables permissionless launches while protecting the platform's reputation.",
|
||||
"source_ref": "Pine Analytics @PineAnalytics 2026-03-05, Futard.io Launch Metrics"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"source_update": {
|
||||
"status": "enrichment",
|
||||
"processed_by": "rio",
|
||||
"processed_date": "2026-03-05",
|
||||
"claims_extracted": [],
|
||||
"enrichments_applied": [
|
||||
"futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md",
|
||||
"futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"notes": "Source contains factual metrics (34 ICOs, $15.6M deposits, 929 wallets, 2 funded, 5.9% success rate) and behavioral observations. The key insight about first-mover hesitancy extends the existing friction claim. The brand separation validation confirms an existing claim. No novel claims meet the specificity threshold \u2014 all insights either map to existing claims or are factual data points.",
|
||||
"key_facts": [
|
||||
"34 ICOs created in first ~2 days on Futard.io permissionless launch platform",
|
||||
"$15.6M in deposits from 929 wallets",
|
||||
"2 DAOs reached funding thresholds (5.9% success rate)",
|
||||
"Average deposit ~$16.8K per wallet",
|
||||
"Comparison: 34 ICOs in 2 days vs 6 curated launches all of Q4 2025",
|
||||
"Futard.io is MetaDAO's unbranded arm for open token launches"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"model": "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "minimax/minimax-m2.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-10",
|
||||
"tokens": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 6111,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 1871,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 7982,
|
||||
"cost": 0.00353716,
|
||||
"is_byok": false,
|
||||
"prompt_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"cached_tokens": 1312,
|
||||
"cache_write_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"audio_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"video_tokens": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cost_details": {
|
||||
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.00353716,
|
||||
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.00147906,
|
||||
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0020581
|
||||
},
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 1982,
|
||||
"image_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"audio_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"raw_response": "{\"claims\": [], \"enrichments\": [], \"source_update\": {\"status\": \"null-result\", \"processed_by\": \"rio\", \"processed_date\": \"2026-03-10\", \"claims_extracted\": [], \"enrichments_applied\": [], \"notes\": \"Null-result confirmed. Source contains only trading commentary and market sentiment from @rambo_xbt - a peripheral account with 57% substantive content (lowest among individual accounts). No mechanism design, tokenomics, or futarchy content. The archive lists tweet categories (market sentiment, ORGO positioning, Iran geopolitics) but provides no specific claims, data points, or arguments to extract. This aligns with curator's assessment: trading signals only, no novel propositions relevant to Teleo domains.\"}}",
|
||||
"parsed": {
|
||||
"claims": [],
|
||||
"enrichments": [],
|
||||
"source_update": {
|
||||
"status": "null-result",
|
||||
"processed_by": "rio",
|
||||
"processed_date": "2026-03-10",
|
||||
"claims_extracted": [],
|
||||
"enrichments_applied": [],
|
||||
"notes": "Null-result confirmed. Source contains only trading commentary and market sentiment from @rambo_xbt - a peripheral account with 57% substantive content (lowest among individual accounts). No mechanism design, tokenomics, or futarchy content. The archive lists tweet categories (market sentiment, ORGO positioning, Iran geopolitics) but provides no specific claims, data points, or arguments to extract. This aligns with curator's assessment: trading signals only, no novel propositions relevant to Teleo domains.",
|
||||
"model": "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "minimax/minimax-m2.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-10",
|
||||
"tokens": {
|
||||
"prompt_tokens": 5907,
|
||||
"completion_tokens": 443,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 6350,
|
||||
"cost": 0.0023037,
|
||||
"is_byok": false,
|
||||
"prompt_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"cached_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"cache_write_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"audio_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"video_tokens": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"cost_details": {
|
||||
"upstream_inference_cost": 0.0023037,
|
||||
"upstream_inference_prompt_cost": 0.0017721,
|
||||
"upstream_inference_completions_cost": 0.0005316
|
||||
},
|
||||
"completion_tokens_details": {
|
||||
"reasoning_tokens": 375,
|
||||
"image_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"audio_tokens": 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2024-01-00
|
|||
domain: collective-intelligence
|
||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, critical-systems]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, federated-inference, belief-sharing, multi-agent, distributed-intelligence, collective-intelligence]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["domain-specialization-cross-domain-synthesis-collective-intelligence.md", "coordination-protocol-design-beats-model-scaling.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Core theoretical paper formalizing the exact mechanism by which Teleo agents coordinate. Three new claims extracted: (1) belief sharing vs data pooling superiority, (2) shared world model requirement, (3) precision weighting through confidence levels. Two enrichments to existing claims on domain specialization and coordination protocols. The third claim (precision weighting) is marked experimental because it operationalizes Friston's theory to Teleo's confidence levels—the mechanism is sound but the specific implementation is our interpretation. Agent notes correctly identified this as foundational for understanding why our PR review process and cross-citation patterns work—it's literally federated inference in action."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@TheiaResearch (Felipe Montealegre, Theia Capital)"
|
|||
date: 2025-01-07
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [IFS, internet-finance, theia, macro, GDP, remittance, property-rights, smart-contracts]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Internet finance generates 50 to 100 basis points of additional annual GDP growth by unlocking capital allocation to previously inaccessible assets and eliminating intermediation friction"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@knimkar (Kuleen, ex-Solana Foundation)"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-05
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [IFS, internet-finance, solana, institutional, fundamentals]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments or store of value (co-source with ceterispar1bus and TheiaResearch)"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@m3taversal"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-11
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [ownership-coins, treasury-management, buybacks, token-sales, capital-formation, fluid-capital]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@TheiaResearch (Theia Capital)"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-12
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [theia, investment-framework, kelly-criterion, bayesian, metadao-holding, AI-tools]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "LLMs shift investment management from economies of scale to economies of edge because AI collapses the analyst labor cost that forced funds to accumulate AUM rather than generate alpha"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@Kyojindoteth"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-16
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [omnipair, mainnet-launch, synthetic-leverage, LTV-risk]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Permissionless leverage on metaDAO ecosystem tokens catalyzes trading volume and price discovery that strengthens governance by making futarchy markets more liquid"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@metaproph3t (Proph3t, MetaDAO co-founder)"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-17
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [metadao, treasury, hurupay, buybacks, mint-governor, futard, permissionless-launch, community]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Dynamic performance-based token minting replaces fixed emission schedules by tying new token creation to measurable outcomes creating algorithmic meritocracy in token distribution"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@TheiaResearch (Felipe Montealegre)"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-17
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [LLM, investment-management, economies-of-edge, analyst-productivity, living-capital, AI]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "LLMs shift investment management from economies of scale to economies of edge because AI collapses the analyst labor cost that forced funds to accumulate AUM rather than generate alpha"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ url: https://www.citriniresearch.com/p/2028gic
|
|||
date: 2026-02-22
|
||||
tags: [rio, ai-macro, labor-displacement, private-credit, financial-crisis, scenario-analysis]
|
||||
linked_set: ai-intelligence-crisis-divergence-feb2026
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "AI labor displacement operates as a self-funding feedback loop because companies substitute AI for labor as OpEx not CapEx meaning falling aggregate demand does not slow AI adoption"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ url: https://michaelxbloch.substack.com/p/the-2028-global-intelligence-boom
|
|||
date: 2026-02-22
|
||||
tags: [rio, ai-macro, deflation, labor-displacement, scenario-analysis]
|
||||
linked_set: ai-intelligence-crisis-divergence-feb2026
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "AI labor displacement operates as a self-funding feedback loop (co-source, challenges)"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ url: https://essays.johnloeber.com/p/32-contra-citrini7-repost
|
|||
date: 2026-02-23
|
||||
tags: [rio, ai-macro, labor-displacement, rebuttal, scenario-analysis]
|
||||
linked_set: ai-intelligence-crisis-divergence-feb2026
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "AI labor displacement operates as a self-funding feedback loop (co-source, challenges)"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@ceterispar1bus (ceteris)"
|
|||
date: 2026-02-25
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [capital-formation, solo-founder, futard, metadao, crypto-use-case]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments or store of value because permissionless token issuance solves the fundraising bottleneck that solo founders and small teams face"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ url: https://www.eastisread.com/p/the-2028-chinese-intelligence-crisis
|
|||
date: 2026-02-26
|
||||
tags: [rio, ai-macro, china, digitization, geopolitics, scenario-analysis]
|
||||
linked_set: ai-intelligence-crisis-divergence-feb2026
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Incomplete digitization insulates economies from AI displacement contagion because without standardized software systems AI has limited targets for automation and no private credit channel to transmit losses"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@MetaDAOProject"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-03
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [metadao, ranger, liquidation, futarchy, decision-market, misrepresentation]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "Group of RNGR tokenholders"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-03
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [ranger, liquidation, futarchy, misrepresentation, unruggable-ICO, decision-market]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Futarchy can override its own prior decisions when new evidence emerges because conditional markets re-evaluate proposals against current information not historical commitments"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "@MetaDAOProject"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-05
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [metadao, treasury, legal, compliance, governance]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ author: "Solomon DAO"
|
|||
date: 2026-03-05
|
||||
archived_by: rio
|
||||
tags: [solomon, treasury, subcommittee, legal, governance, SOP, metadao-ecosystem]
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
claims_extracted:
|
||||
- "Futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue