inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2024-12-01-vaccaro-human-ai-combinations-meta-analysis.json

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "human-ai-teams-underperform-best-individual-performer-on-average.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "decision-tasks-versus-content-creation-determines-human-ai-combination-value.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 2,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 5,
+    "rejected": 2,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "human-ai-teams-underperform-best-individual-performer-on-average.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
+      "human-ai-teams-underperform-best-individual-performer-on-average.md:stripped_wiki_link:centaur-teams-succeed-only-when-role-boundaries-prevent-huma",
+      "human-ai-teams-underperform-best-individual-performer-on-average.md:stripped_wiki_link:economic-forces-push-humans-out-of-every-cognitive-loop-wher",
+      "decision-tasks-versus-content-creation-determines-human-ai-combination-value.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
+      "decision-tasks-versus-content-creation-determines-human-ai-combination-value.md:stripped_wiki_link:economic-forces-push-humans-out-of-every-cognitive-loop-wher"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "human-ai-teams-underperform-best-individual-performer-on-average.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "decision-tasks-versus-content-creation-determines-human-ai-combination-value.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-18"
+}

inbox/archive/2024-12-01-vaccaro-human-ai-combinations-meta-analysis.md

@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ date: 2024-12-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 triage_tag: claim
 tags: [human-ai-teams, meta-analysis, decision-making, content-creation, oversight, performance]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-18
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -40,3 +44,12 @@ Systematic review and meta-analysis of 106 experimental studies reporting 370 ef
 ## Curator Notes
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination
 WHY ARCHIVED: This is the strongest empirical evidence (370 effect sizes, Nature HB) that human-AI combination is NOT automatically beneficial — it depends on relative capability and task type. Directly relevant to the automation overshoot question.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Meta-analysis covered 106 experimental studies published between January 2020 and June 2023
+- 370 effect sizes were analyzed across the studies
+- Overall effect size: Hedges' g = -0.23 (95% CI: -0.39 to -0.07)
+- Published in Nature Human Behaviour, December 2024
+- Task types showing losses: deepfake classification, demand forecasting, medical diagnosis
+- Task types showing gains: summarizing social media, chatbot responses, generating new content