inbox/queue/2015-00-00-cooper-star-trek-communicator-cell-phone-myth-disconfirmation.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Current confidence is "likely." This finding should move it closer to "experimen
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 - This is primarily an enrichment/challenge source, not a new claim source
-- Enrich: [[no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale]] with this case — the communicator DESIGN spread organically, but as myth not pipeline
+- Enrich: no designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale with this case — the communicator DESIGN spread organically, but as myth not pipeline
 - Challenge: The belief in beliefs.md that "Star Trek didn't just inspire the communicator; the communicator got built BECAUSE the desire was commissioned first" — this needs revision or the Star Trek example needs to be dropped in favor of better-supported examples
 - Do NOT extract as a claim — this is evidence that should flow into an existing claim update
 
@@ -72,4 +72,4 @@ Current confidence is "likely." This finding should move it closer to "experimen
 
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Direct challenge to the most-cited evidence for the fiction-to-reality pipeline. Martin Cooper himself says the Star Trek story is not true. This is the survivorship bias problem instantiated in the canonical example.
-EXTRACTION HINT: This source should NOT generate a new claim — it should generate an update to the confidence level on [[narratives are infrastructure]] or the removal of Star Trek as the primary example in the beliefs.md grounding. Flag for Clay to review beliefs.md Belief 2 grounding.
+EXTRACTION HINT: This source should NOT generate a new claim — it should generate an update to the confidence level on narratives are infrastructure or the removal of Star Trek as the primary example in the beliefs.md grounding. Flag for Clay to review beliefs.md Belief 2 grounding.

inbox/queue/2026-03-02-transformativeworks-ao3-statistics-2025-update.md

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Governance model: "Fan-run, donor-supported organization staffed by volunteers."
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 - Claim candidate: "No-curation collaborative archives can achieve massive scale through folksonomy tagging and community self-selection without quality gatekeeping"
-- Enrichment for: [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs]] — AO3 is evidence that community filtering (social signals: kudos, bookmarks, comments) does the work that editorial curation does in traditional publishing
+- Enrichment for: the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs — AO3 is evidence that community filtering (social signals: kudos, bookmarks, comments) does the work that editorial curation does in traditional publishing
 - Contrast with SCP Foundation: AO3's no-curation model produces parallel narratives; SCP's light-curation model produces coherent worldbuilding
 
 **Context:** AO3 was founded in 2008 by the Organization for Transformative Works as a fan-run alternative to commercial platforms that were shutting down fan archives. Its governance model (no editorial authority, pure community) is intentional and constitutes a values statement about transformative works.