extract: 2026-03-18-telegram-m3taversal-futairdbot-what-about-leverage-in-the-metadao-eco #1260
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ This connects to [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2024-01-24-futardio-proposal-develop-amm-program-for-futarchy | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal identifies that 'estimating a fair price for the future value of MetaDao under pass/fail conditions is difficult, and most reasonable estimates will have a wide range. This uncertainty discourages people from risking their funds with limit orders near the midpoint price, and has the effect of reducing liquidity (and trading).' This is cited as 'the main reason for switching to AMMs.'
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue