extract: 2025-08-01-apha-food-is-medicine-health-equity-report #1272
4 changed files with 87 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "food-is-medicine-evidence-quality-varies-by-intervention-type-with-medically-tailored-meals-showing-strong-utilization-reduction-while-produce-prescriptions-lack-clinical-outcome-data.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 2,
|
||||
"rejected": 1,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"food-is-medicine-evidence-quality-varies-by-intervention-type-with-medically-tailored-meals-showing-strong-utilization-reduction-while-produce-prescriptions-lack-clinical-outcome-data.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"food-is-medicine-evidence-quality-varies-by-intervention-type-with-medically-tailored-meals-showing-strong-utilization-reduction-while-produce-prescriptions-lack-clinical-outcome-data.md:stripped_wiki_link:SDOH-interventions-show-strong-ROI-but-adoption-stalls-becau"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"food-is-medicine-evidence-quality-varies-by-intervention-type-with-medically-tailored-meals-showing-strong-utilization-reduction-while-produce-prescriptions-lack-clinical-outcome-data.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "medically-tailored-meals-show-null-glycemic-outcomes-in-controlled-trials-despite-strongest-observational-evidence.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "food-as-medicine-hospitalization-reduction-evidence-is-separate-from-glycemic-control-evidence-suggesting-different-mechanisms.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 4,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"medically-tailored-meals-show-null-glycemic-outcomes-in-controlled-trials-despite-strongest-observational-evidence.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"medically-tailored-meals-show-null-glycemic-outcomes-in-controlled-trials-despite-strongest-observational-evidence.md:stripped_wiki_link:SDOH-interventions-show-strong-ROI-but-adoption-stalls-becau",
|
||||
"food-as-medicine-hospitalization-reduction-evidence-is-separate-from-glycemic-control-evidence-suggesting-different-mechanisms.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||
"food-as-medicine-hospitalization-reduction-evidence-is-separate-from-glycemic-control-evidence-suggesting-different-mechanisms.md:stripped_wiki_link:medical-care-explains-only-10-20-percent-of-health-outcomes-"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"medically-tailored-meals-show-null-glycemic-outcomes-in-controlled-trials-despite-strongest-observational-evidence.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||
"food-as-medicine-hospitalization-reduction-evidence-is-separate-from-glycemic-control-evidence-suggesting-different-mechanisms.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-04
|
|||
domain: health
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: report
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [food-is-medicine, federal-policy, sdoh, nutrition, medicaid, evidence-framework]
|
||||
processed_by: vida
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 1 claims, 1 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,3 +65,10 @@ HHS, in collaboration with other federal departments through the Federal Food Is
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Existing SDOH claim about intervention ROI
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Federal taxonomy document that defines the intervention spectrum — essential context for any FIM claim in the KB
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Extract the intervention taxonomy (MTMs vs. MTGs vs. produce prescriptions vs. education) with evidence quality for each. The document's own caveats are the most honest signal about the evidence base.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Federal Food Is Medicine definition: 'Interventions encompassing a broad range of approaches that promote optimal health and reduce disease burden by providing nutritious food — with human services, education, and policy change, through collaboration at the nexus of health care and community'
|
||||
- 16 states had approved or pending Section 1115 demonstrations for FIM coverage as of February 2025
|
||||
- HHS Food Is Medicine Landscape Summary published February 4, 2025
|
||||
- Federal FIM Collaborative includes USDA, CMS, HRSA, CDC, NIH, and HHS ODPHP
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-04-01
|
|||
domain: health
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: journal-article
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [medically-tailored-meals, mtm, health-economics, simulation, modeling, evidence-gaps, scaling, cost-effectiveness]
|
||||
processed_by: vida
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,3 +72,14 @@ The simulation model projects cost savings; the perspective paper notes the evid
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Food-as-medicine evidence claims — extends Session 1's produce prescription finding to MTMs
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Documents the simulation-vs-RCT gap at the highest level of FIM intervention intensity; the Maryland MTM pilot null result is the key new finding
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the Maryland MTM pilot null result (HbA1c -0.7% vs. -0.6%, not significant) — this is the strongest disconfirmation of the "better interventions fix the problem" hypothesis
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Health Affairs published two simultaneous papers on MTM scaling in April 2025: a simulation model (hlthaff.2024.01307) and a perspective critique (hlthaff.2025.00161)
|
||||
- The simulation model projected MTMs would be cost-saving in nearly all US states
|
||||
- The perspective paper called for 'integrating real-world variations in MTM program design into future models, including dose, duration, and ancillary services'
|
||||
- Maryland MTM pilot (2024, JGIM): 74 adults, frozen meals + dietitian calls for 6 months, HbA1c change -0.7% treatment vs -0.6% control (not significant)
|
||||
- FAME-D trial ongoing: 200 adults, comparing MTMs to $40/month food subsidy
|
||||
- Australian MTM trial commenced Q1 2023, results anticipated March 2025
|
||||
- 16 states had active or pending Section 1115 waivers for FIM coverage at time of publication
|
||||
- Older MTM observational studies showed 49% reduction in hospital admissions
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue