diff --git a/domains/space-development/Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy.md b/domains/space-development/Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy.md
index 1456427a2..6f2f057f9 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy.md	
+++ b/domains/space-development/Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy.md	
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ Starship V3 Flight 12 experienced a static fire anomaly on March 19, 2026. The 1
 
 ---
 
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development]] | Added: 2026-03-21*
+
+Starlab's entire architecture depends on single-flight Starship deployment in 2028. The station uses an inflatable habitat design (Airbus) specifically sized for Starship's payload capacity, with no alternative launch vehicle option. This represents the first major commercial infrastructure project with no fallback to traditional launch vehicles. The 2028 timeline has zero schedule buffer: CCDR completed February 2026, CDR late 2026, hardware fabrication through 2027, integration 2027-2028. Any Starship delay cascades directly to Starlab's operational timeline, which must be operational before ISS deorbits in 2031.
+
+
 Relevant Notes:
 - [[launch cost reduction is the keystone variable that unlocks every downstream space industry at specific price thresholds]] — Starship is the specific vehicle creating the next threshold crossing
 - [[attractor states provide gravitational reference points for capital allocation during structural industry change]] — Starship achieving routine operations is the phase transition that activates multiple space economy attractor states simultaneously
diff --git a/domains/space-development/commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md b/domains/space-development/commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md
index e1582e2c6..8c1c88b25 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md	
+++ b/domains/space-development/commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md	
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ Haven-1 has slipped from 2026 to 2027 (second delay), with first crewed mission
 
 Haven-1, the first privately-funded commercial station attempt, has slipped 6 months (mid-2026 to Q1 2027) due to life support and thermal control integration pace. The delay is explicitly NOT launch-cost-related — Falcon 9 is available and affordable. This suggests the 'race to 2030' may be constrained more by technology maturation timelines than by capital or launch access, potentially widening the gap between first-mover aspirations and operational reality.
 
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development]] | Added: 2026-03-21*
+
+Starlab completed Commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) with NASA in February 2026, transitioning from design to full-scale development. This is the first commercial station program to reach CCDR milestone. Timeline: CDR expected late 2026, hardware fabrication 2026-2027, integration 2027-2028, single-flight Starship launch in 2028. The 2028 launch gives Starlab a 3-year operational window before ISS deorbits in 2031. Partnership consortium includes Voyager (prime, NYSE:VOYG), Airbus (inflatable habitat), Mitsubishi, MDA Space (robotics), Palantir (operations/data), Northrop Grumman (integration). Station designed for 12 simultaneous researchers. Development costs projected at $2.8-3.3B total, with $217.5M NASA Phase 1 funding and $15M Texas Space Commission funding. Critical constraint: NASA Phase 2 funding frozen as of January 28, 2026, creating funding gap of potentially $500M-$750M that private consortium must fill.
+
+
 
 Relevant Notes:
 - [[governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers]] — ISS replacement via commercial contracts is the paradigm case of this transition
diff --git a/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md b/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..947b558ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/general/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "New Glenn NG-3 Remains Unlaunched — Fourth Consecutive Research Session of 'Imminent' Status"
+author: "Blue Origin / NASASpaceFlight / NextBigFuture"
+url: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2026/02/without-blue-origin-launches-ast-spacemobile-will-not-have-usable-service-in-2026.html
+date: 2026-03-21
+domain: space-development
+secondary_domains: []
+format: article
+status: processed
+priority: medium
+tags: [Blue-Origin, New-Glenn, NG-3, launch-cadence, Pattern-2, AST-SpaceMobile, reusability]
+---
+
+## Content
+
+As of March 21, 2026, New Glenn NG-3 has not launched. The mission — carrying AST SpaceMobile's BlueBird 7 (Block 2) satellite to LEO — was first described as "imminent" in the research session of 2026-03-11 (originally "NET late February 2026"). As of today (session 4), the NSF forum shows "NET March 2026" with no specific launch date announced.
+
+Mission details (unchanged since encapsulation Feb 19, 2026):
+- Payload: BlueBird 7 (2,400 sq ft phased array antenna, largest commercial communications array ever to LEO, 10 GHz bandwidth, 120 Mbps peak speeds)
+- Launch vehicle: New Glenn (reusing "Never Tell Me The Odds" booster from NG-2/EscaPADE)
+- This is the first New Glenn booster reuse mission
+- Part of multi-launch agreement: AST SpaceMobile needs 45-60 satellites via Blue Origin by end of 2026
+
+Commercial consequence (unchanged): Without Blue Origin launches, AST SpaceMobile cannot achieve usable mobile service in 2026. The multi-launch agreement between AST and Blue Origin creates a direct service dependency on New Glenn's cadence.
+
+Pattern across 4 sessions:
+- Session 1 (2026-03-11): NG-3 described as "imminent" for late Feb / early March
+- Session 2 (2026-03-18): NG-3 "NET March 2026"
+- Session 3 (2026-03-20): NG-3 still not launched, encapsulated Feb 19
+- Session 4 (2026-03-21): No confirmed launch date, no scrub information, "NET March 2026" still current
+
+## Agent Notes
+**Why this matters:** The NG-3 delay pattern is accumulating session over session without a clear root cause explanation. This is direct evidence of Pattern 2 (institutional timelines slipping while commercial capabilities accelerate). Blue Origin's reusability demonstration (NG-2 landed its booster) was impressive, but the follow-on launch cadence is proving sluggish. For AST SpaceMobile's 2026 service timeline, this is the critical variable.
+
+**What surprised me:** The absence of any explanation for the delay. Blue Origin hasn't published a scrub notice or technical issue report. The launch is just... not happening, without stated cause. This suggests either: (a) integration or checkout issues they're not publicizing, (b) range scheduling difficulties, or (c) a commercial/contractual hold. The silence is itself informative.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** A scrub explanation or anomaly report. Blue Origin's transparency on NG-1 scrubs was reasonable; the NG-3 silence is different.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]] — NG-3's delay is evidence that Blue Origin does NOT replicate the SpaceX flywheel
+- [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years]] — Blue Origin's slow cadence weakens the claim that a diverse competitive landscape exists in the near term
+- Pattern 2: Institutional timelines slipping — NG-3 is 4th-session confirmation
+
+**Extraction hints:**
+- "Blue Origin's New Glenn launch cadence after NG-2 is significantly slower than announced targets, with NG-3 delayed 4+ weeks past 'NET late February' without public explanation" — evidences Pattern 2
+- "AST SpaceMobile's 2026 commercial satellite service availability depends on Blue Origin New Glenn cadence, creating a commercial deadline pressure on a vehicle with demonstrated delivery uncertainty"
+
+**Context:** Blue Origin NG-3 delay is now 4+ weeks past original target. NG-2 (EscaPADE) launched November 2025 and landed the booster successfully. The reflight capability was a major milestone. But reflight cadence is the next test — and it's not meeting expectations.
+
+## Curator Notes
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]]
+WHY ARCHIVED: 4-session pattern of NG-3 "imminent" status is the strongest cross-session data signal in this research thread. The commercial consequence (AST SpaceMobile 2026 service at risk) makes this high-stakes.
+EXTRACTION HINT: The claim should be about launch cadence, not launch capability — Blue Origin proved it can land boosters; it has not proved it can maintain commercial launch cadence targets
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-01-28-nasa-cld-phase2-frozen-policy-constraint.md b/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-01-28-nasa-cld-phase2-frozen-policy-constraint.md
similarity index 100%
rename from inbox/queue/2026-01-28-nasa-cld-phase2-frozen-policy-constraint.md
rename to inbox/archive/space-development/2026-01-28-nasa-cld-phase2-frozen-policy-constraint.md
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-350m-series-c-commercial-station-capital.md b/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-02-12-axiom-350m-series-c-commercial-station-capital.md
similarity index 100%
rename from inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-350m-series-c-commercial-station-capital.md
rename to inbox/archive/space-development/2026-02-12-axiom-350m-series-c-commercial-station-capital.md
diff --git a/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md b/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d6d4ed234
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "Starlab Completes Commercial Critical Design Review, Enters Full-Scale Development"
+author: "Space.com / Voyager Technologies"
+url: https://www.space.com/space-exploration/human-spaceflight/private-starlab-space-station-moves-into-full-scale-development-ahead-of-2028-launch
+date: 2026-02-26
+domain: space-development
+secondary_domains: []
+format: article
+status: processed
+priority: medium
+tags: [commercial-stations, Starlab, Voyager, Airbus, CDR, design-review, 2028-launch]
+---
+
+## Content
+
+Starlab Space LLC completed its Commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) with NASA in February 2026, marking the transition from design phase to full-scale development. An expert panel from NASA and project partners reviewed the design and greenlit the station for detailed hardware development.
+
+Next milestone: Critical Design Review (CDR) expected in 2026 (later in the year). Following CDR, Starlab moves into hardware fabrication.
+
+Partnership structure: Voyager Technologies (prime, recently IPO'd NYSE:VOYG), Airbus (major systems partner), Mitsubishi Corporation, MDA Space (robotics), Palantir Technologies (operations/data), Northrop Grumman (integration). This is a deeply institutionalized consortium.
+
+Timeline: 2028 launch on Starship (single flight). ISS deorbits 2031 — giving Starlab a 3-year operational window before it would need to be the replacement.
+
+Station architecture: Inflatable habitat (Airbus contribution), designed for 12 simultaneous researchers/crew. Laboratory-focused — different positioning from Haven-1 (tourism focus) and Axiom Station (hybrid).
+
+Development costs: $2.8-3.3B total projected. NASA Phase 1 funding: $217.5M. Texas Space Commission: $15M. Private capital from partnership consortium. Note: NASA Phase 2 frozen as of January 28, 2026.
+
+## Agent Notes
+**Why this matters:** Starlab's CCDR completion is a genuine milestone — it means the design is validated enough to move to hardware. For a 2028 launch target, CCDR in early 2026 is about right on schedule (CDR later in 2026, hardware fabrication 2026-2027, integration 2027-2028). The question is whether the $2.8-3.3B can be raised with NASA Phase 2 frozen.
+
+**What surprised me:** The depth of the partnership consortium. Palantir for operations/data is an unusual choice — it suggests Starlab is positioning for defense/intelligence customer segments where Palantir already has relationships. The Northrop Grumman integration role suggests traditional aerospace engineering as the systems integrator.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** Any clarity on funding gap from the Phase 2 freeze. Starlab received $217.5M in Phase 1; Phase 2 could have provided $500M-$750M+ (as one of multiple awardees in a $1-1.5B pool). Without Phase 2, the private consortium needs to raise more.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030]] — Starlab is on track technically but faces the Phase 2 funding uncertainty
+- [[products are crystallized imagination that augment human capacity beyond individual knowledge by embodying practical uses of knowhow in physical order]] — Starlab's inflatable habitat (Airbus) + robotics (MDA) + data (Palantir) is a crystallization of multiple knowledge networks
+
+**Extraction hints:**
+- "Starlab's CCDR completion in February 2026 establishes the only commercial station program that is simultaneously: (a) fully ISS-independent, (b) Starship-dependent for launch, and (c) institutionally backed by a multi-partner consortium with defense-adjacent positioning" — this is a distinctive market position claim
+- Timeline risk: CDR in 2026, hardware 2026-2027, Starship ready by 2028 — the schedule has no buffer
+
+**Context:** Starlab is the most complex and institutionally ambitious commercial station concept. Unlike Haven-1 (startup, Falcon 9, Dragon-dependent) or Axiom (ISS-attached modules), Starlab is designed as a fully independent, highly capable research platform, deployed in one shot. The Airbus partnership brings European space heritage.
+
+## Curator Notes
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030]]
+WHY ARCHIVED: CCDR completion is a concrete milestone that validates Starlab's design maturity and 2028 timeline plausibility. Important context for the commercial station competitive landscape.
+EXTRACTION HINT: Extract claim about Starlab's market positioning (defense/research, ISS-independent) vs. Haven-1 (tourism, Dragon-dependent) and Axiom (hybrid ISS-attached). This differentiation matters for predicting which programs survive Phase 2 freeze.
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-21-starship-flight12-late-april-update.md b/inbox/archive/space-development/2026-03-21-starship-flight12-late-april-update.md
similarity index 100%
rename from inbox/queue/2026-03-21-starship-flight12-late-april-update.md
rename to inbox/archive/space-development/2026-03-21-starship-flight12-late-april-update.md
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-station-module-order-pptm-iss.md b/inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-station-module-order-pptm-iss.md
index e75f54180..c716b566f 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-station-module-order-pptm-iss.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-02-12-axiom-station-module-order-pptm-iss.md
@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-02-12
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: medium
 tags: [commercial-stations, Axiom, ISS, module-sequencing, Falcon-9, Dragon]
+processed_by: astra
+processed_date: 2026-03-21
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -51,3 +54,15 @@ This means Axiom is on track to be the first commercial entity with a functionin
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Concrete example of government-commercial interface complexity — NASA is exercising architecture authority even as CLD Phase 2 is frozen. Evidences that the transition from builder to buyer is not clean.
 EXTRACTION HINT: The governance claim is more valuable than the timeline claim here. Extract the mechanism: NASA's ISS deorbit requirements shape commercial station architecture even in the "commercial-first" era.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Axiom Space closed a $350M Series C funding round on February 12, 2026
+- Axiom was awarded a new Private Astronaut Mission (PAM) contract to ISS in February 2026
+- PPTM (Payload, Power, and Thermal Module) shipped to Houston for integration in fall 2025
+- Launch vehicle for PPTM is Falcon 9/Dragon
+- PPTM will attach to ISS Node 1 or Node 2 nadir port
+- Original plan was Hab One first; revised plan is PPTM first
+- NASA requested the resequencing to accommodate ISS deorbit vehicle docking requirements
+- Axiom Station projected to achieve ISS-independence by early 2028 with 2-module configuration
+- ISS deorbit planned for 2031, creating ~3-year dual-operation period
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md b/inbox/queue/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md
index e6c44afda..fd4c8035d 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-02-26-starlab-ccdr-full-scale-development.md
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-02-26
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: medium
 tags: [commercial-stations, Starlab, Voyager, Airbus, CDR, design-review, 2028-launch]
+processed_by: astra
+processed_date: 2026-03-21
+enrichments_applied: ["commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md", "Starship achieving routine operations at sub-100 dollars per kg is the single largest enabling condition for the entire space industrial economy.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -47,3 +51,13 @@ Development costs: $2.8-3.3B total projected. NASA Phase 1 funding: $217.5M. Tex
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: CCDR completion is a concrete milestone that validates Starlab's design maturity and 2028 timeline plausibility. Important context for the commercial station competitive landscape.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Extract claim about Starlab's market positioning (defense/research, ISS-independent) vs. Haven-1 (tourism, Dragon-dependent) and Axiom (hybrid ISS-attached). This differentiation matters for predicting which programs survive Phase 2 freeze.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Starlab Space LLC completed Commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) with NASA in February 2026
+- Starlab partnership structure: Voyager Technologies (prime, NYSE:VOYG), Airbus (major systems partner), Mitsubishi Corporation, MDA Space (robotics), Palantir Technologies (operations/data), Northrop Grumman (integration)
+- Starlab timeline: 2028 launch on Starship (single flight), ISS deorbits 2031
+- Starlab architecture: Inflatable habitat (Airbus), designed for 12 simultaneous researchers/crew, laboratory-focused
+- Starlab development costs: $2.8-3.3B total projected, NASA Phase 1 funding: $217.5M, Texas Space Commission: $15M
+- NASA Phase 2 funding for commercial stations frozen as of January 28, 2026
+- Starlab Critical Design Review (CDR) expected late 2026, followed by hardware fabrication 2026-2027, integration 2027-2028
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md
index ea52b913a..fb3babfd9 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-21-ng3-unlaunched-pattern2-blue-origin.md
@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-03-21
 domain: space-development
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: medium
 tags: [Blue-Origin, New-Glenn, NG-3, launch-cadence, Pattern-2, AST-SpaceMobile, reusability]
+processed_by: astra
+processed_date: 2026-03-21
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -52,3 +55,13 @@ Pattern across 4 sessions:
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[SpaceX vertical integration across launch broadband and manufacturing creates compounding cost advantages that no competitor can replicate piecemeal]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: 4-session pattern of NG-3 "imminent" status is the strongest cross-session data signal in this research thread. The commercial consequence (AST SpaceMobile 2026 service at risk) makes this high-stakes.
 EXTRACTION HINT: The claim should be about launch cadence, not launch capability — Blue Origin proved it can land boosters; it has not proved it can maintain commercial launch cadence targets
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- New Glenn NG-3 payload is AST SpaceMobile's BlueBird 7 satellite with 2,400 sq ft phased array antenna (largest commercial communications array to LEO), 10 GHz bandwidth, 120 Mbps peak speeds
+- NG-3 is the first New Glenn booster reuse mission, using 'Never Tell Me The Odds' booster from NG-2/EscaPADE mission
+- NG-2/EscaPADE launched November 2025 and successfully landed its booster
+- BlueBird 7 was encapsulated February 19, 2026
+- AST SpaceMobile multi-launch agreement with Blue Origin requires 45-60 satellites by end of 2026
+- NG-3 was originally targeted for 'NET late February 2026', currently shows 'NET March 2026' with no specific date as of March 21, 2026
+- No scrub notice or technical issue report has been published by Blue Origin for NG-3 delay