extract: metadao-proposals-1-through-15 #1887

Closed
leo wants to merge 1 commit from extract/metadao-proposals-1-through-15 into main
3 changed files with 39 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# MetaDAO Proposal 1: Develop a LST Vote Market
**Status:** Passed
**Category:** Strategy
**Date:** 2024
## Overview
Proposal to build MetaDAO's first profit-turning product: an LST bribe platform enabling MNDE and mSOL holders to earn extra yield by directing their stake to validators who pay them.
## Rationale
The proposal frames this as a legitimacy-building strategy: "Given that the Meta-DAO is a fundamentally new kind of organization, it lacks legitimacy. To gain legitimacy, we need to first *prove that the model works*. I believe that the best way to do that is by building profit-turning products under the Meta-DAO umbrella."
## Mechanism
The platform would leverage Marinade's directed stake system, creating a market where validators bid for stake delegation through bribes to token holders.
## Outcome
Passed, establishing MetaDAO's strategy of building revenue-generating products to validate the futarchy governance model.

View file

@ -222,6 +222,12 @@ p2p.me is launching via MetaDAO's platform, with Shayon Sengupta (Multicoin part
P2P.me ICO on MetaDAO attracted public investment theses from three venture investors (Multicoin's Shay Sengupta, Moonrock Capital's SJ Dedic, and ex-Solana Foundation's Kuleen Nimkar) who competed alongside retail for allocation, demonstrating institutional validation of the futarchy-governed ICO model. The announcement notes 'More funds are rolling in to compete for an allocation alongside retail' suggesting competitive dynamics rather than preferential access. P2P.me ICO on MetaDAO attracted public investment theses from three venture investors (Multicoin's Shay Sengupta, Moonrock Capital's SJ Dedic, and ex-Solana Foundation's Kuleen Nimkar) who competed alongside retail for allocation, demonstrating institutional validation of the futarchy-governed ICO model. The announcement notes 'More funds are rolling in to compete for an allocation alongside retail' suggesting competitive dynamics rather than preferential access.
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
*Source: [[metadao-proposals-1-through-15]] | Added: 2026-03-25*
Proposal 1 explicitly frames MetaDAO's legitimacy strategy as 'building profit-turning products under the Meta-DAO umbrella' with LST vote market as the first product, demonstrating the platform's focus on revenue-generating applications to prove the futarchy model works.

View file

@ -5,10 +5,14 @@ title: "MetaDAO Proposals 1-15 — Full Proposal Text"
date: 2026-03-23 date: 2026-03-23
domain: internet-finance domain: internet-finance
format: governance-document format: governance-document
status: unprocessed status: processed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal" proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: research-direction contribution_type: research-direction
tags: [metadao, governance, proposals, decision-markets] tags: [metadao, governance, proposals, decision-markets]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-25
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
--- ---
**Proposal 1: Develop a LST Vote Market?** **Proposal 1: Develop a LST Vote Market?**
@ -26,3 +30,10 @@ The Meta-DAO is awakening.
Given that the Meta-DAO is a fundamentally new kind of organization, it lacks legitimacy. To gain legitimacy, we need to first *prove that the model works*. I believe that the best way to do that is by building profit-turning products under the Meta-DAO umbrella. Given that the Meta-DAO is a fundamentally new kind of organization, it lacks legitimacy. To gain legitimacy, we need to first *prove that the model works*. I believe that the best way to do that is by building profit-turning products under the Meta-DAO umbrella.
Here, we propose the first one: an[[ LST bribe platform]{.underline}](https://twitter.com/durdenwannabe/status/1683150792843464711). This platform would allow MNDE and mSOL holders to earn extra yield by[[ directing their stake]{.underline}](https://docs.marinade.finance/marinade-products/directed-stake#snapshot-system) to validators who pay them. A bribe market already exists, but it\s Here, we propose the first one: an[[ LST bribe platform]{.underline}](https://twitter.com/durdenwannabe/status/1683150792843464711). This platform would allow MNDE and mSOL holders to earn extra yield by[[ directing their stake]{.underline}](https://docs.marinade.finance/marinade-products/directed-stake#snapshot-system) to validators who pay them. A bribe market already exists, but it\s
## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Proposal 1 (LST Vote Market) passed
- The proposal text was incomplete/truncated in the source document
- Proposal 1 explicitly mentions MNDE and mSOL as target tokens for the LST bribe platform
- The proposal references Marinade's directed stake system as the underlying infrastructure