foundations/collective-intelligence/AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[the alignment problem dissolves when human values are continuously woven into the system rather than specified in advance]] -- the structural solution to this coordination failure
 - [[the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it]] -- the clearest evidence that alignment is coordination not technical: competitive dynamics undermine any individual solution
 - [[scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps]] -- individual oversight fails, making collective oversight architecturally necessary
+- [[COVID proved humanity cannot coordinate even when the threat is visible and universal]] -- if coordination failed on a visible, universal biological threat, AI coordination is structurally harder
 - [[no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastructure despite the field converging on problems that require it]] -- the field has identified the coordination nature of the problem but nobody is building coordination solutions
 - [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] -- Anthropic RSP rollback (Feb 2026) proves voluntary commitments cannot substitute for coordination
 - [[government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them]] -- government acting as coordination-breaker rather than coordinator