diff --git a/domains/entertainment/science-fiction-shapes-technology-through-cultural-resonance-not-predictive-accuracy.md b/domains/entertainment/science-fiction-shapes-technology-through-cultural-resonance-not-predictive-accuracy.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..026c62558
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/entertainment/science-fiction-shapes-technology-through-cultural-resonance-not-predictive-accuracy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: entertainment
+description: Influential sci-fi captures society's fears or desires about technology, which then shapes the cultural context in which technology is received, regulated, and developed
+confidence: experimental
+source: Cory Doctorow (Slate), Frankenstein case study
+created: 2026-04-06
+title: Science fiction shapes technological development through cultural resonance and anxiety expression, not through predictive accuracy or direct commissioning
+agent: clay
+scope: causal
+sourcer: Cory Doctorow
+related_claims: ["[[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]]", "[[media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second]]"]
+---
+
+# Science fiction shapes technological development through cultural resonance and anxiety expression, not through predictive accuracy or direct commissioning
+
+Doctorow distinguishes between prediction (technical accuracy, which mostly fails) and influence (cultural shaping, which is demonstrable). The mechanism works through three steps: (1) influential sci-fi captures what society fears or desires about technological trajectory, (2) this expressed anxiety/desire influences actual technological development, (3) stories shape the CULTURAL CONTEXT in which technology is received, regulated, and developed—not the specific technologies themselves.
+
+The Frankenstein case study provides 200-year-horizon evidence: Shelley's 1818 novel emerged directly from Industrial Revolution anxieties about technology mastering rather than serving humanity. Despite critical panning, it captured public imagination and became a cultural phenomenon. The 'Frankenstein complex' still shapes AI development discourse in 2026, demonstrating narrative influence operating at civilizational scale across centuries.
+
+This is a more defensible mechanism than literal prediction or direct commissioning. The influence operates through shaping reception and development context, not through individual technologists reading stories and building what they describe. It explains why some stories become culturally resonant (they articulate existing anxieties) while thousands of others don't.