diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-operators-strategic-silence-in-cftc-anprm-allows-anti-gambling-narrative-to-dominate-by-default.md b/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-operators-strategic-silence-in-cftc-anprm-allows-anti-gambling-narrative-to-dominate-by-default.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bf17cde5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-operators-strategic-silence-in-cftc-anprm-allows-anti-gambling-narrative-to-dominate-by-default.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "action": "flag_duplicate",
+  "candidates": [
+    "retail-mobilization-against-prediction-markets-creates-asymmetric-regulatory-input-because-anti-gambling-advocates-dominate-comment-periods-while-governance-market-proponents-remain-silent.md",
+    "cftc-anprm-comment-record-lacks-futarchy-governance-market-distinction-creating-default-gambling-framework.md",
+    "futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-due-to-lack-of-advocacy-and-regulatory-conflation-with-gambling.md"
+  ],
+  "reasoning": "The reviewer feedback indicates that the core thesis of this claim—that silence allows an anti-gambling narrative to dominate—is semantically identical to 'retail-mobilization-against-prediction-markets-creates-asymmetric-regulatory-input...'. While this new claim introduces specific operator names, the overarching argument about narrative dominance due to lack of counter-advocacy is already covered. The other two candidates also cover aspects of the CFTC ANPRM comment record and the risk of anti-gambling framing dominating due to a lack of specific distinctions or advocacy, making them highly overlapping in their thematic content and causal implications."
+}
\ No newline at end of file