theseus: research 2026 03 26 #2894

Closed
m3taversal wants to merge 2 commits from theseus/research-2026-03-26 into main
Showing only changes of commit f5922a22f5 - Show all commits

View file

@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ ASL-3 protections were narrowly scoped: preventing assistance with extended, end
**KB connections:** **KB connections:**
- [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — this activation is an example of a unilateral commitment being maintained; note however that RSP v3.0 (February 2026) later weakened other commitments - [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints]] — this activation is an example of a unilateral commitment being maintained; note however that RSP v3.0 (February 2026) later weakened other commitments
- [[AI lowers the expertise barrier for engineering biological weapons from PhD-level to amateur]] — the VCT trajectory is the evidence cited for this activation - AI lowers the expertise barrier for engineering biological weapons from PhD-level to amateur — the VCT trajectory is the evidence cited for this activation
- [[safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability]] — precautionary activation is an attempt at this sequencing - [[safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability]] — precautionary activation is an attempt at this sequencing
**Extraction hints:** Two distinct claims worth extracting: (1) the precautionary governance principle itself ("uncertainty about threshold crossing triggers more protection, not less"), and (2) the structural limitation (self-referential accountability, no independent verification). The first is a governance innovation claim; the second is a governance limitation claim. Both deserve KB representation. **Extraction hints:** Two distinct claims worth extracting: (1) the precautionary governance principle itself ("uncertainty about threshold crossing triggers more protection, not less"), and (2) the structural limitation (self-referential accountability, no independent verification). The first is a governance innovation claim; the second is a governance limitation claim. Both deserve KB representation.