domains/ai-alignment/AI is already superintelligent through jagged intelligence combining human-level reasoning with superhuman speed and tirelessness which means the alignment problem is present-tense not future-tense.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[recursive self-improvement creates explosive intelligence gains because the system that improves is itself improving]] — Smith's jagged intelligence thesis challenges this: superintelligence may arrive through combination rather than recursion
 - [[bostrom takes single-digit year timelines to superintelligence seriously while acknowledging decades-long alternatives remain possible]] — if SI is already here via jagged intelligence, timeline debates are moot
 - [[the first mover to superintelligence likely gains decisive strategic advantage because the gap between leader and followers accelerates during takeoff]] — jagged intelligence distributes SI across multiple labs simultaneously, complicating first-mover dynamics
-- [[centaur teams outperform both pure humans and pure AI because complementary strengths compound]] — jagged intelligence makes centaur complementarity more precise: humans contribute where AI is jagged-weak
+- centaur teams outperform both pure humans and pure AI because complementary strengths compound — jagged intelligence makes centaur complementarity more precise: humans contribute where AI is jagged-weak
 
 Topics:
 - [[_map]]

domains/ai-alignment/_map.md

@@ -60,4 +60,4 @@ The shared theory underlying Theseus's domain analysis lives in the foundations
 - [[the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it]] — structural race dynamics
 - [[no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastructure despite the field converging on problems that require it]] — the institutional gap
 - [[collective superintelligence is the alternative to monolithic AI controlled by a few]] — the distributed alternative
-- [[centaur teams outperform both pure humans and pure AI because complementary strengths compound]] — human-AI complementarity evidence
+- centaur teams outperform both pure humans and pure AI because complementary strengths compound — human-AI complementarity evidence