domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md

@@ -66,3 +66,10 @@ Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument directly challenges the DCM preemptio
 **Source:** MultiState, March 2026
 
 Curtis-Schiff bill would eliminate DCM preemption for sports contracts through Congressional redefinition, showing that CFTC registration does not provide permanent regulatory protection against legislative action
+
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** Curtis-Schiff Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, March 2026
+
+Curtis-Schiff bill would eliminate DCM preemption for sports contracts by explicitly prohibiting CFTC-registered platforms from listing them, showing that Congressional action can override CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction claim through statutory redefinition rather than requiring judicial interpretation.

domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governance-markets-risk-regulatory-capture-by-anti-gambling-frameworks-because-the-event-betting-and-organizational-governance-use-cases-are-conflated-in-current-policy-discourse.md

@@ -94,3 +94,10 @@ Curtis-Schiff Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act (March 2026) demonstrates the
 **Source:** MultiState, March 2026
 
 Curtis-Schiff bill demonstrates concrete legislative pathway where sports prediction markets are redefined as gambling despite CFTC registration, with bipartisan Senate support suggesting political durability beyond partisan opposition
+
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Curtis-Schiff Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, March 2026
+
+Curtis-Schiff bipartisan bill demonstrates that prediction market gambling conflation has Congressional support beyond just state AGs. Republican Curtis (Utah) co-sponsoring suggests opposition is broader than partisan gaming revenue protection, indicating cultural/addiction concerns drive support even in non-gaming states.