diff --git a/inbox/archive/2024-11-00-ruiz-serra-factorised-active-inference-multi-agent.md b/inbox/archive/2024-11-00-ruiz-serra-factorised-active-inference-multi-agent.md
index 6b3649c50..747af9778 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2024-11-00-ruiz-serra-factorised-active-inference-multi-agent.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2024-11-00-ruiz-serra-factorised-active-inference-multi-agent.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2024-11-00
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [active-inference, multi-agent, game-theory, strategic-interaction, factorised-generative-model, nash-equilibrium]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2024-11-12
+enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a moral preference.md", "designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Critical paper for Teleo architecture—provides formal justification for Leo's evaluator role and deliberate interaction structure design. The finding that individual EFE minimization doesn't guarantee collective optimization validates our architectural choices (PR review, cross-domain synthesis, evaluator role) as necessary rather than optional. Primary connection to multipolar failure claim confirmed. Two new claims extracted on individual-collective optimization tension and factorised theory of mind. Three enrichments to existing coordination and collective intelligence claims."
 ---
 
 ## Content