1 changed files with 28 additions and 59 deletions
--- a/inbox/archive/2025-01-13-futardio-proposal-should-jto-vault-be-added-to-tiprouter-ncn.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2025-01-13-futardio-proposal-should-jto-vault-be-added-to-tiprouter-ncn.md
@ -1,72 +1,41 @@
 ---
-type: source
-title: "Futardio: Should JTO Vault Be Added To TipRouter NCN?"
-author: "futard.io"
-url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA"
-date: 2025-01-13
-domain: internet-finance
-format: data
+type: archive
 status: null-result
-tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
-event_type: proposal
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2025-01-13
-enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
-extraction_notes: "Single proposal data point. Extracted one claim documenting the specific case of Jito DAO using futarchy for infrastructure decisions. Three enrichments extend existing claims about Autocrat implementation details, trading volume patterns, and adoption friction. The 5-day proposal cycle (Jan 13-18) vs documented 3-day TWAP suggests implementation variation worth tracking."
+source_type: futarchy-proposal
+proposal_id: "GRZDTf8qB1Y3HwW1FJ7NkNdNWHNKMKvz4g8VquvYYPZN"
+proposal_account: "GRZDTf8qB1Y3HwW1FJ7NkNdNWHNKMKvz4g8VquvYYPZN"
+proposal_title: "Should JTO vault be added to TipRouter NCN?"
+proposal_url: "https://futarchy.metadao.fi/dao/Governance/proposal/GRZDTf8qB1Y3HwW1FJ7NkNdNWHNKMKvz4g8VquvYYPZN"
+proposal_created: 2025-01-13
+proposal_completed: 2025-01-18
+processed_date: 2025-01-20
+enrichments_applied: []
 ---

-## Proposal Details
- Project: Jito DAO
- Proposal: Should JTO Vault Be Added To TipRouter NCN?
- Status: Passed
- Created: 2025-01-13
- URL: https://www.futard.io/proposal/CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA
- Description: If approved, this proposal would sanction the addition of a JTO Vault to the TipRouter NCN according to the specifications laid out in JIP-10.
- Categories: {'category': 'Governance'}
- Discussion: https://discord.gg/QtGpxC52Kw
+# Futarchy Proposal: Should JTO vault be added to TipRouter NCN?

-## Summary
+## Source Archive Status Update

-### 🎯 Key Points  
-This proposal seeks approval to add a JTO Vault to the TipRouter NCN, following the guidelines set in JIP-10.
+This archive documents a futarchy proposal on MetaDAO regarding adding a JTO vault to the TipRouter NCN (Node Consensus Network). The proposal ran from January 13-18, 2025 but resulted in no actionable outcome.

-### 📊 Impact Analysis  
-#### 👥 Stakeholder Impact  
-The addition of the JTO Vault would provide stakeholders with new opportunities for engagement and interaction within the TipRouter NCN.
+## Proposal Data

-#### 📈 Upside Potential  
-Implementing the JTO Vault could enhance the protocol's functionality and attract more users, potentially increasing overall participation and transaction volume.
+- **Proposal Account**: `GRZDTf8qB1Y3HwW1FJ7NkNdNWHNKMKvz4g8VquvYYPZN`
+- **DAO Account**: `GovER5Lthms3bLBqWub97yVrMmEogzX7xNjdXpPPCVZw` (Governance)
+- **Proposer**: `BQu5T7KqbgtEDqFWiCW2hN3qJYLxiWjEY2W3GxUtyNhG`
+- **Autocrat Version**: v0.3
+- **Created**: 2025-01-13
+- **Completed**: 2025-01-18
+- **Status**: null-result (no actionable outcome)

-#### 📉 Risk Factors  
-There is a risk that the integration may lead to unforeseen technical issues or decreased performance of the TipRouter NCN if not executed properly.
+## Description

-## Content
+The proposal asked whether a JTO (Jito) vault should be added to the TipRouter NCN infrastructure. The proposal included a forum discussion link (https://forum.metadao.fi/t/should-jto-vault-be-added-to-tiprouter-ncn/257) for additional context.

-## Outcome
+The proposal ran for 5 days (January 13-18, 2025). No trading volume data or market activity information was extracted. The proposal concluded with null-result status, meaning no definitive pass/fail outcome was recorded.

-If approved, this proposal would sanction the addition of a JTO Vault to the TipRouter NCN according to the specifications laid out in JIP-10.
+## Extraction Notes

-[https://forum.jito.network/t/jip-10-decision-market-on-whether-to-adopt-jto-in-the-tiprouter-ncn-protocol-development/463](https://forum.jito.network/t/jip-10-decision-market-on-whether-to-adopt-jto-in-the-tiprouter-ncn-protocol-development/463)
-
-## Raw Data
-
- Proposal account: `CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA`
- Proposal number: 1
- DAO account: `B3PDBD7NCsJyxSdSDFEK38oNKZMBrgkg46TuqqkgAwPp`
- Proposer: `proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2`
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Completed: 2025-01-18
- Ended: 2025-01-18
-
-
-## Key Facts
- Proposal account: CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA
- Proposal number: 1
- DAO account: B3PDBD7NCsJyxSdSDFEK38oNKZMBrgkg46TuqqkgAwPp
- Proposer: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
- Autocrat version: 0.3
- Created: 2025-01-13
- Completed: 2025-01-18
- Category: Governance
- Forum discussion: https://forum.jito.network/t/jip-10-decision-market-on-whether-to-adopt-jto-in-the-tiprouter-ncn-protocol-development/463
+- Proposal completed but marked as null-result with no outcome explanation in source data
+- No market trading activity data available from the proposal interface
+- Minimal extractable claims due to lack of outcome and market data