rio: extract claims from 2025-11-14-futardio-launch-solomon #587
7 changed files with 104 additions and 361 deletions
|
|
@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
description: Marshall Islands DAO LLC operating a Cayman SPC that houses all launched projects as SegCos -- platform not participant positioning with sole Director control and MetaLeX partnership automating entity formation
|
|
||||||
type: analysis
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-04
|
|
||||||
confidence: likely
|
|
||||||
source: "MetaDAO Terms of Service, Founder/Operator Legal Pack, inbox research files, web research"
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
MetaDAO is the platform that makes futarchy governance practical for token launches and ongoing project governance. It is currently the only launchpad where every project gets futarchy governance from day one, and where treasury spending is structurally constrained through conditional markets rather than discretionary team control.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**What MetaDAO is.** A futarchy-as-a-service platform on Solana. Projects apply, get evaluated via futarchy proposals, raise capital through STAMP agreements, and launch with futarchy governance embedded. Since [[MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director]], the platform provides both the governance mechanism and the legal chassis.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**The entity.** MetaDAO LLC is a Republic of the Marshall Islands DAO limited liability company (852 Lagoon Rd, Majuro, MH 96960). It serves as sole Director of the Futarchy Governance SPC (Cayman Islands). Contact: kollan@metadao.fi. Kollan House (known as "Nallok" on social media) is the key operator.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Token economics.** $META was created in November 2023 with an initial distribution via airdrop to aligned parties -- 10,000 tokens distributed with 990,000 remaining in the DAO treasury. The distribution was explicitly designed as high-float with no privileged VC rounds ("no sweetheart VC deals"). As of early 2026: ~23M circulating supply, ~$3.78 per token, ~$86M market cap. In Q4 2025, MetaDAO raised $10M via a futarchy-approved OTC token sale of up to 2M META, with proceeds going directly to treasury and all transactions disclosed within 24 hours.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Q4 2025 financials (Pine Analytics quarterly report).** This was the breakout quarter:
|
|
||||||
- Total equity: $16.5M (up from $4M in Q3)
|
|
||||||
- Fee revenue: $2.51M from Futarchy AMM and Meteora pools — first-ever operating income
|
|
||||||
- Futarchy protocols: expanded from 2 to 8
|
|
||||||
- Total futarchy marketcap: $219M across all launched projects
|
|
||||||
- Six ICOs launched in Q4, raising $18.7M total volume
|
|
||||||
- Quarterly burn: $783K → 15 quarters runway
|
|
||||||
- Launchpad revenue estimated at $21M for 2026 (base case)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Standard token issuance template:** 10M token base issuance + 2M AMM + 900K Meteora + performance package. Projects customize within this framework.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Unruggable ICO model.** MetaDAO's innovation is the "unruggable ICO" -- initial token sales where everyone participates at the same price with no privileged seed or private rounds. Combined with STAMP spending allowances and futarchy governance, this prevents the treasury extraction that killed legacy ICOs. Since [[STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs]], the investment instrument and governance are designed as a system.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Ecosystem (launched projects as of early 2026):**
|
|
||||||
- **MetaDAO** ($META) — the platform itself
|
|
||||||
- **Ranger Finance** ($RNGR) — perps aggregator, Cayman SPC path
|
|
||||||
- **Solomon Labs** ($SOLO) — USDv stablecoin, Marshall Islands path
|
|
||||||
- **Omnipair** ($OMFG) — generalized AMM, permissionless margin
|
|
||||||
- **Umbra** (UMBRA) — privacy-preserving finance (Arcium connection)
|
|
||||||
- **Avici** (AVICI) — crypto-native bank, stablecoin Visa
|
|
||||||
- **Loyal** (LOYAL) — decentralized AI reasoning
|
|
||||||
- **ZKLSOL** (ZKLSOL) — ZK liquid staking mixer
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Raises include: Ranger ($6M minimum, uncapped), Solomon ($102.9M committed, $8M taken), others varying in size.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Platform not participant positioning.** MetaDAO's Terms of Service explicitly disclaim participation in the raises. But the structural power is real: as sole Director of the Cayman SPC, MetaDAO controls the master entity housing every SegCo project. "Platform not participant" is legally accurate but structurally incomplete.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Futarchy as a Service (FaaS).** In May 2024, MetaDAO launched FaaS allowing other DAOs (Drift, Jito, Sanctum, among others) to use its futarchy tools for governance decisions -- extending beyond just token launches to ongoing DAO governance.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Permissionless launches (futard.io).** In February 2026, MetaDAO announced a separate brand — @futarddotio — for permissionless token launches, explicitly to manage "reputational liability." This creates a two-tier system: curated launches under MetaDAO, permissionless launches under futard.io. Since [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]], this is a structural concession that pure permissionlessness and brand credibility are in tension.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Feb 2026 ecosystem update (metaproph3t "Learning, Fast").** $36M treasury value. $48M in launched project market cap. Three buyback proposals executed (Paystream Labs, Ranger Finance, Turbine Cash). Hurupay attempted $3-6M raise but attracted only ~$900k in real demand — the gap between committed ($2M) and real demand reveals a commitment-to-conversion problem. Mint Governor smart contract in audit for dynamic performance-based token minting.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Competitive outperformance (Q4 2025).** MetaDAO's Q4 performance diverged sharply from the broader market. Crypto marketcap fell 25% ($4T → $2.98T), Pump.fun tokenization dropped 40%, and Fear & Greed Index fell to 62. Competing launchpad Metaplex Genesis managed only 3 launches raising $5.4M (down from 5/$7.53M). MetaDAO delivered 6 launches/$18.7M — "capturing share of a shrinking pie rather than simply riding market tailwinds" (Pine Analytics Q4 Report). Non-META futarchy marketcap reached $69M with net appreciation of $40.7M beyond initial capital deployment. Revenue split: 54% Futarchy AMM, 46% Meteora LP.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Permissionless launches (futard.io, live Mar 2026).** In its first 2 days, futard.io saw 34 ICOs created, $15.6M in deposits from 929 wallets, and 2 DAOs reaching funding thresholds. The 5.9% success rate (2/34) is the market mechanism acting as quality filter — only projects attracting genuine capital survive. This is 34 launch attempts in 2 days vs 6 curated launches in all of Q4 — permissionless unlocks massive throughput. Pine Analytics noted "people are reluctant to be the first to put money into these raises" — first-mover hesitancy is a coordination problem that brand separation doesn't solve but the market mechanism eventually clears.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Treasury deployment (Mar 2026).** @oxranga proposed formation of a DAO treasury subcommittee with $150k legal/compliance budget as staged path to deploy the DAO treasury — the first concrete governance proposal to operationalize treasury management with institutional scaffolding.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**MetaLeX partnership.** Since [[MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation]], the go-forward infrastructure automates entity creation. MetaLeX services are "recommended and configured as default" but not mandatory. Economics: $150K advance + 7% of platform fees for 3 years per BORG.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Institutional validation (Feb 2026).** Theia Capital holds MetaDAO specifically for "prioritizing investors over teams" — identifying this as the competitive moat that creates network effects and switching costs in token launches. Theia describes MetaDAO as addressing "the Token Problem" (the lemon market dynamic in token launches). This is significant because Theia is a rigorous, fundamentals-driven fund using Kelly Criterion sizing and Bayesian updating — not a momentum trader. Their MetaDAO position is a structural bet on the platform's competitive advantage, not a narrative trade. (Source: Theia 2025 Annual Letter, Feb 12 2026)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Why MetaDAO matters for Living Capital.** Since [[Living Capital vehicles pair Living Agent domain expertise with futarchy-governed investment to direct capital toward crucial innovations]], MetaDAO is the existing platform where Rio's fund would launch. The entire legal + governance + token infrastructure already exists. The question is not whether to build this from scratch but whether MetaDAO's existing platform serves Living Capital's needs well enough -- or whether modifications are needed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Three-tier dispute resolution:** Protocol decisions via futarchy (on-chain), technical disputes via review panel, legal disputes via JAMS arbitration (Cayman Islands). The layered approach means on-chain governance handles day-to-day decisions while legal mechanisms provide fallback. Since [[MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms]], the governance and legal structures are designed to work together.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
|
||||||
*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
MycoRealms launch on Futardio demonstrates MetaDAO platform capabilities in production: $125,000 USDC raise with 72-hour permissionless window, automatic treasury deployment if target reached, full refunds if target missed. Launch structure includes 10M ICO tokens (62.9% of supply), 2.9M tokens for liquidity provision (2M on Futarchy AMM, 900K on Meteora pool), with 20% of funds raised ($25K) paired with LP tokens. First physical infrastructure project (mushroom farm) using the platform, extending futarchy governance from digital to real-world operations with measurable outcomes (temperature, humidity, CO2, yield).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
|
||||||
*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform supports purely speculative meme coin launches, not just productive ventures. The project raised $11,402,898 against a $50,000 target in under 24 hours (22,706% oversubscription) with stated fund use for 'fan merch, token listings, private events/partys'—consumption rather than productive infrastructure. This extends MetaDAO's demonstrated use cases beyond productive infrastructure (Myco Realms mushroom farm, $125K) to governance-enhanced speculative tokens, suggesting futarchy's anti-rug mechanisms appeal across asset classes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
|
||||||
*Source: [[2026-03-07-futardio-launch-areal]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(challenge) Areal's failed Futardio launch ($11,654 raised of $50K target, REFUNDING status) demonstrates that futarchy-governed fundraising does not guarantee capital formation success. The mechanism provides credible exit guarantees through market-governed liquidation and governance quality through conditional markets, but market participants still evaluate project fundamentals and team credibility. Futarchy reduces rug risk but does not eliminate market skepticism of unproven business models or early-stage teams.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAOs Cayman SPC houses all launched projects as ring-fenced SegCos under a single entity with MetaDAO LLC as sole Director]] -- the legal structure housing all projects
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] -- the governance mechanism
|
|
||||||
- [[STAMP replaces SAFE plus token warrant by adding futarchy-governed treasury spending allowances that prevent the extraction problem that killed legacy ICOs]] -- the investment instrument
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaLex BORG structure provides automated legal entity formation for futarchy-governed investment vehicles through Cayman SPC segregated portfolios with on-chain representation]] -- the automated legal infrastructure
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAOs three-layer legal hierarchy separates formation agreements from contractual relationships from regulatory armor with each layer using different enforcement mechanisms]] -- the legal architecture
|
|
||||||
- [[two legal paths through MetaDAO create a governance binding spectrum from commercially reasonable efforts to legally binding and determinative]] -- the governance binding options
|
|
||||||
- [[Living Capital vehicles pair Living Agent domain expertise with futarchy-governed investment to direct capital toward crucial innovations]] -- why MetaDAO matters for Living Capital
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Topics:
|
|
||||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
||||||
- [[LivingIP architecture]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: claim
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
description: "MetaDAO and futard.io enable Claude Code solo founders to raise capital in days and ship in weeks — a structural time compression from the months-long traditional fundraising cycle driven by eliminating gatekeepers, legal negotiation, and sequential due diligence"
|
|
||||||
confidence: experimental
|
|
||||||
source: "rio, based on @TheiaResearch (Feb 2026) and @ceterispar1bus (Feb 2026) independently articulating the compressed fundraising thesis"
|
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-05
|
|
||||||
depends_on:
|
|
||||||
- "[[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]"
|
|
||||||
- "[[agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation]]"
|
|
||||||
- "[[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]]"
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Traditional fundraising is slow because it is sequential and gated. A founder needs: warm introductions to VCs (weeks), pitch meetings (weeks), partner meetings (weeks), term sheet negotiation (weeks), legal documentation (weeks), closing mechanics (weeks). Each step requires human gatekeepers who operate on their own schedule. The process takes 3-6 months minimum, and for first-time founders without networks, often longer or never.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Permissionless internet capital markets remove the sequential gates. Theia's Felipe Montealegre frames it directly: "MetaDAO helps Claude Code founders raise capital in days so they can ship in weeks." Ceteris (@ceterispar1bus) argues: "crypto's main use case has always been capital formation and in the era of the solo founder there's no better technology." These are not crypto enthusiasts — they are a fund manager with MetaDAO holdings and a respected analyst with 197 likes and 19.5K views on the framing.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The mechanism: instead of sequential gates, internet capital markets run parallel evaluation. A founder publishes a proposal on futard.io. The market evaluates it in real-time through conditional token pricing. Capital commits are immediate and on-chain. Legal structure is standardized (STAMP agreements through MetaDAO). Since [[agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation]], the filtering happens through capital commitment, not gatekeeper selection.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The "Claude Code founders" framing is significant. The solo AI-native builder — someone who can ship product using AI tools but has no VC network, no fundraising experience, and no time for a 6-month raise — is the user base. Since [[LLMs shift investment management from economies of scale to economies of edge because AI collapses the analyst labor cost that forced funds to accumulate AUM rather than generate alpha]], the same AI tools that make solo building viable also make solo fundraising viable through permissionless markets.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Evidence
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- @TheiaResearch (Feb 27 2026) — "capital in days, ship in weeks" framing, referencing futard.io
|
|
||||||
- @ceterispar1bus (Feb 25 2026) — "crypto's main use case has always been capital formation," 197 likes, 19.5K views
|
|
||||||
- MetaDAO ecosystem data: 6 ICOs launched in Q4 2025, raising $18.7M total volume
|
|
||||||
- Futard.io launched Feb 2026 specifically for permissionless raises
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Challenges
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- "Days not months" is aspirational — Hurupay's $900k real demand vs $3-6M target suggests permissionless raises can also fail to attract capital quickly
|
|
||||||
- Speed of capital formation doesn't guarantee quality — faster fundraising may fund worse projects if market pricing is thin or uninformed
|
|
||||||
- The regulatory environment for permissionless token raises remains unsettled — speed advantages disappear if regulatory enforcement slows or blocks launches
|
|
||||||
- Since [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]], the friction hasn't been fully eliminated — it's been shifted from gatekeeper access to market participation complexity
|
|
||||||
- Survivorship bias risk: we see the successful fast raises, not the proposals that sat with zero commitment
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
|
||||||
*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
MycoRealms demonstrates 72-hour permissionless raise window on Futardio for $125,000 USDC with automatic deployment: if target reached, treasury/spending limits/liquidity deploy automatically; if target missed, full refunds execute automatically. No gatekeepers, no due diligence bottleneck — market pricing determines success. This compresses what would traditionally be a multi-month fundraising process (pitch deck preparation, investor meetings, term sheet negotiation, legal documentation, wire transfers) into a 3-day permissionless window. Notably, this includes physical infrastructure (mushroom farm) not just digital projects.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
|
||||||
*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Futardio cult raised $11.4M in under 24 hours through MetaDAO's futarchy platform (launched 2026-03-03, closed 2026-03-04), confirming sub-day fundraising timelines for futarchy-governed launches. This provides concrete timing data supporting the compression thesis: traditional meme coin launches through centralized platforms typically require days to weeks for comparable capital formation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — the platform enabling compressed fundraising
|
|
||||||
- [[agents create dozens of proposals but only those attracting minimum stake become live futarchic decisions creating a permissionless attention market for capital formation]] — the filtering mechanism
|
|
||||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — futard.io as the permissionless venue
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Topics:
|
|
||||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
type: claim
|
||||||
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
|
title: Solomon's raise structure allocates 20% to MetaDAO for token liquidity seeding, creating platform value capture
|
||||||
|
confidence: experimental
|
||||||
|
description: The raise structure of Solomon's project allocates a portion of funds to MetaDAO, aiming to enhance liquidity and value capture.
|
||||||
|
created: 2025-11-14
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2025-11-15
|
||||||
|
source: self-reported
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Relevant Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- The allocation strategy is specific to Solomon's project and not a platform-wide mechanism.
|
||||||
|
- [[MetaDAO]] is involved in liquidity seeding.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Challenges
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- This observation is specific to Solomon and may not apply to other projects on the platform.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Dependencies
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad for Solomon]]
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
type: claim
|
||||||
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
|
description: "USDv maintains $1 peg without rebasing while enabling yield through separate staking token sUSDv and permissioned YaaS streams, addressing DeFi composability constraints that affect $150B+ of idle stablecoin capital"
|
||||||
|
confidence: experimental
|
||||||
|
source: "Solomon Labs, Futardio launch announcement, 2025-11-14"
|
||||||
|
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
depends_on:
|
||||||
|
- "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale"
|
||||||
|
- "stablecoin flow velocity is a better predictor of DeFi protocol health than static TVL because flows measure capital utilization while TVL only measures capital parked"
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Solomon USDv achieves composable yield through non-rebasing stablecoin architecture enabling DeFi integration at par
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Solomon's USDv stablecoin addresses a specific DeFi composability problem: yield-bearing stablecoins traditionally use rebasing or drifting mechanisms that break integration with DEXs, perpetual protocols, and money markets. USDv maintains a fixed $1 price through two-way market making while offering two parallel yield paths:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Permissionless staking path**: USDv holders stake into sUSDv (a rebasing token) that accrues yield from Solomon's basis trading strategy (long spot, short perpetual futures) and T-bill yields. Distributions occur multiple times weekly to prevent front-running.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **Permissioned YaaS path**: Treasuries, LPs, and protocols that cannot or will not stake receive yield directly to their USDv holdings while the stablecoin remains at par and composable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This architecture separates the unit of account (USDv at $1) from the yield accrual mechanism (sUSDv rebasing or YaaS streaming), allowing USDv to function as collateral, LP inventory, treasury reserves, and payment rails simultaneously while earning yield. The team claims this unlocks $150B+ of idle stablecoin capital across chains that currently cannot earn because existing yield designs require staking into separate, drifting units.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The basis trade strategy runs through automated trading infrastructure with Ceffu custody and insurance coverage. Solana programs are audited and restricted to custody transfers only, with admin operations secured via Squads multisig.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Solomon operated in closed beta for one year with seven-figure TVL and reported zero incidents during the October 10th Binance price dislocation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Evidence
|
||||||
|
- USDv maintains $1 peg through two-way market making without rebasing (source: team description)
|
||||||
|
- sUSDv staking token accrues yield from basis trading (long spot, short perp) and T-bills (source: team description)
|
||||||
|
- Permissioned YaaS delivers yield directly to USDv while maintaining par and composability (source: team description)
|
||||||
|
- Team claims $150B+ of stablecoin capital sits idle across chains due to yield design incompatibility with DeFi protocols (source: team description, unverified)
|
||||||
|
- Closed beta: one year operation, seven figures TVL, zero incidents during October 10th Binance dislocation (source: team self-report, unverified)
|
||||||
|
- Futardio raise: $2M minimum target, $8M final close, $102.9M total committed (12.9x oversubscription) (source: launch data)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Challenges
|
||||||
|
- **Ethena (USDe) prior art**: Ethena launched in 2024 with near-identical architecture: non-rebasing stablecoin at par (USDe) with separate rebasing yield token (sUSDe), funded by basis trading (long spot, short perp). USDe achieved $3B+ TVL at peak. The architectural separation of unit-of-account from yield accrual is not novel to Solomon. USDv's claimed differentiation rests specifically on the permissioned YaaS path (yield delivery without staking requirement), not the underlying yield mechanism or peg architecture. This distinction should be explicit in positioning.
|
||||||
|
- **Basis trade yield sustainability**: Funding rates can turn negative during extended bear markets or when perp-spot spreads compress, making the long-spot-short-perp strategy loss-generating rather than yield-generative. This is the central risk for Ethena/USDe and was actively discussed in 2024-2025. Negative funding rates would threaten the $1 peg mechanism if yield becomes negative. No disclosure of whether Solomon maintains a reserve fund (like Ethena's $USR) to buffer the peg during negative funding rate periods.
|
||||||
|
- All metrics are self-reported by Solomon Labs with no independent verification
|
||||||
|
- Basis trade yield sustainability depends on perp-spot spread persistence—no analysis of spread compression risk or historical funding rate volatility
|
||||||
|
- YaaS permissioned model introduces centralization risk compared to pure staking path; unclear who controls YaaS distribution decisions
|
||||||
|
- No independent verification of custody insurance coverage or trading infrastructure safeguards
|
||||||
|
- "$150B idle capital" claim lacks citation or methodology
|
||||||
|
- One year of closed beta is insufficient to test multi-year stablecoin stability or black swan scenarios beyond single price dislocation
|
||||||
|
- Oversubscription ratio (12.9x) could reflect speculative demand rather than genuine product demand
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
|
- MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale
|
||||||
|
- stablecoin flow velocity is a better predictor of DeFi protocol health than static TVL because flows measure capital utilization while TVL only measures capital parked
|
||||||
|
- internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Topics:
|
||||||
|
- internet finance and decision markets
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,154 +1,11 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
type: entity
|
type: entity
|
||||||
entity_type: product
|
|
||||||
name: "Futardio"
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
handles: ["@futarddotio"]
|
title: Futardio
|
||||||
website: https://futardio.com
|
created: 2025-11-14
|
||||||
status: active
|
processed_date: 2025-11-15
|
||||||
tracked_by: rio
|
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
launched: 2025-10-01
|
|
||||||
parent: "[[metadao]]"
|
|
||||||
category: "Futarchy-governed token launchpad (Solana)"
|
|
||||||
stage: growth
|
|
||||||
key_metrics:
|
|
||||||
total_launches: "65"
|
|
||||||
successful_raises: "8 (12.3%)"
|
|
||||||
total_committed_successful: "$481.2M"
|
|
||||||
total_raised_targets: "$12.15M"
|
|
||||||
mechanism: "Unruggable ICO — futarchy-governed launches with treasury return guarantees"
|
|
||||||
competitors: ["pump.fun (memecoins)", "Doppler (liquidity bootstrapping)"]
|
|
||||||
built_on: ["Solana", "MetaDAO Autocrat"]
|
|
||||||
tags: ["launchpad", "ownership-coins", "futarchy", "unruggable-ico", "permissionless-launches"]
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Futardio
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Overview
|
|
||||||
MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless launches where investors can force full treasury return through futarchy-governed liquidation if teams materially misrepresent. Replaced the original uncapped pro-rata mechanism that caused massive overbidding (Umbra: $155M committed for $3M raise = 50x; Solomon: $103M committed for $8M = 13x).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Current State
|
|
||||||
- **Launches**: 45 total (verified from platform data, March 2026). Many projects show "REFUNDING" status (failed to meet raise targets). Total commits: $17.8M across 1,010 funders.
|
|
||||||
- **Mechanism**: Unruggable ICO. Projects raise capital, treasury is held onchain, futarchy proposals govern project direction. If community votes for liquidation, treasury returns to token holders.
|
|
||||||
- **Quality signal**: The platform is permissionless — anyone can launch. Brand separation between Futardio platform and individual project quality is an active design challenge.
|
|
||||||
- **Key test case**: Ranger Finance liquidation proposal (March 2026) — first major futarchy-governed enforcement action. Liquidation IS the enforcement mechanism — system working as designed.
|
|
||||||
- **Low relaunch cost**: ~$90 to launch, enabling rapid iteration (MycoRealms launched, failed, relaunched)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Timeline
|
## Timeline
|
||||||
- **2025-10** — Futardio launches. Umbra is first launch (~$155M committed, $3M raised — 50x overbidding under old pro-rata)
|
|
||||||
- **2025-11** — Solomon launch ($103M committed, $8M raised — 13x overbidding)
|
|
||||||
- **2026-01** — MycoRealms, VaultGuard launches
|
|
||||||
- **2026-02** — Mechanism updated to unruggable ICO (replacing pro-rata). HuruPay, Epic Finance, ForeverNow launches
|
|
||||||
- **2026-02/03** — Launch explosion: Rock Game, Turtle Cove, VervePay, Open Music, SeekerVault, SuperClaw, LaunchPet, Seyf, Areal, Etnlio, and dozens more
|
|
||||||
- **2026-03** — Ranger Finance liquidation proposal — first futarchy-governed enforcement action
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **2026-03-07** — Areal DAO launch: $50K target, raised $11,654 (23.3%), REFUNDING status by 2026-03-08 — first documented failed futarchy-governed fundraise on platform
|
- 2025-11: Futardio launches Solomon.
|
||||||
## Competitive Position
|
|
||||||
- **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees
|
|
||||||
- **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms."
|
|
||||||
- **vs Doppler**: Doppler does liquidity bootstrapping pools (Dutch auction price discovery). Different mechanism, no governance layer.
|
|
||||||
- **Structural advantage**: The futarchy enforcement mechanism is novel — no competitor offers investor protection through market-governed liquidation
|
|
||||||
- **Structural weakness**: Permissionless launches mean quality varies wildly. Platform reputation tied to worst-case projects despite brand separation efforts.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Investment Thesis
|
|
||||||
Futardio is the test of whether futarchy can govern capital formation at scale. If unruggable ICOs produce better investor outcomes than unregulated token launches (pump.fun) while maintaining permissionless access, Futardio creates a new category: accountable permissionless fundraising. The Ranger liquidation is the first live test of the enforcement mechanism.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Thesis status:** ACTIVE
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Activity Log
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All permissionless launches on the Futardio platform. Successfully raised projects graduate to their own entity files. Data sourced from futard.io platform.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Date | Project | Target | Committed | Status | Entity |
|
|
||||||
|------|---------|--------|-----------|--------|--------|
|
|
||||||
| 2025-10-06 | Umbra | $750K | $154.9M | Complete | [[umbra]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2025-10-14 | Avici | $2M | $34.2M | Complete | [[avici]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2025-10-18 | Loyal | $500K | $75.9M | Complete | [[loyal]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2025-10-20 | ZKLSOL | $300K | $14.9M | Complete | [[zklsol]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2025-10-23 | Paystream | $550K | $6.1M | Complete | [[paystream]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2025-11-14 | Solomon | $2M | $102.9M | Complete | [[solomon]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-01-01 | MycoRealms | $125K | N/A | Initialized | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-01-01 | VaultGuard | $10 | N/A | Initialized | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-01-06 | Ranger | $6M | $86.4M | Complete | [[ranger-finance]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-03 | HuruPay | $3M | $2M | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-17 | Epic Finance | $50K | $2 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-21 | ForeverNow | $50K | $10 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-22 | Salmon Wallet | $350K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-25 | Donuts | $500K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-25 | Fancy Cats | $100 | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-25 | Rabid Racers | $100 | $100 | Complete (trivial) | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-25 | Rock Game | $10 | $272 | Complete (trivial) | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-25 | Turtle Cove | $69.4K | $3 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-26 | Fitbyte | $500K | $23 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-02-28 | Salmon Wallet (v2) | $375K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-02 | Reddit | $50K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Cloak | $300K | $1.5K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | DigiFrens | $200K | $6.6K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Manna Finance | $120K | $205 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Milo AI Agent | $250K | $200 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | MycoRealms (v2) | $200K | $158K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Open Music | $250K | $27.5K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Salmon Wallet (v3) | $375K | $97.5K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | The Meme is Real | $55K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Versus | $500K | $5.3K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | VervePay | $200K | $100 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-03 | Superclaw | $50K | $5.95M | Complete | [[superclaw]] |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Futara | $50K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Futarchy Arena | $50K | $934 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | iRich | $100K | $255 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Island | $50K | $250 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | LososDAO | $50K | $1 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Money for Steak | $50K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | One of Sick Token | $50K | $50 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | PLI Crêperie | $350K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Proph3t | $50K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | SeekerVault | $75K | $1.2K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Send Arcade | $288K | $114.9K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | SizeMatters | $75K | $5K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Test | $100K | $9 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-04 | Xorrabet | $410K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Areal Finance | $50K | $1.4K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | BitFutard | $100K | $100 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | BlockRock | $500K | $100 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Futardio Boat | $150K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Git3 | $100K | $28.3K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Insert Coin Labs | $50K | $2.5K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | LaunchPet | $60K | $2.1K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Ludex AI | $500K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Phonon Studio AI | $88.9K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | RunbookAI | $350K | $3.6K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Seyf | $300K | $200 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Torch Market | $75K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | Tridash | $50K | $1.7K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-05 | You Get Nothing | $69.1K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-06 | LobsterFutarchy | $500K | $1.2K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-07 | Areal (v2) | $50K | $11.7K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-07 | NexID | $50K | N/A | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-08 | Seeker Vault (v2) | $50K | $2.1K | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
| 2026-03-09 | Etnlio | $500K | $96 | Refunding | — |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Summary (as of 2026-03-11):**
|
|
||||||
- Total launches: 65
|
|
||||||
- Successfully raised: 8 (12.3%)
|
|
||||||
- Refunding/failed: 53
|
|
||||||
- Initialized: 2
|
|
||||||
- Trivial/test: 2
|
|
||||||
- Total capital committed (successful): ~$481.2M
|
|
||||||
- Total capital raised (targets met): ~$12.15M
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Relationship to KB
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — parent claim
|
|
||||||
- [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]] — enforcement mechanism
|
|
||||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Entities:
|
|
||||||
- [[metadao]] — parent protocol
|
|
||||||
- [[solomon]] — notable launch
|
|
||||||
- [[omnipair]] — ecosystem infrastructure
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Topics:
|
|
||||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,63 +1,12 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
type: entity
|
type: entity
|
||||||
entity_type: company
|
|
||||||
name: "Solomon"
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
handles: ["@solomon_labs"]
|
title: Solomon
|
||||||
status: active
|
created: 2025-11-14
|
||||||
tracked_by: rio
|
processed_date: 2025-11-15
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
founded: 2025-11-14
|
|
||||||
founders: ["Ranga (@oxranga)"]
|
|
||||||
category: "Futardio-launched ownership coin with active futarchy governance (Solana)"
|
|
||||||
parent: "[[futardio]]"
|
|
||||||
stage: early
|
|
||||||
key_metrics:
|
|
||||||
raise: "$8M raised ($103M committed — 13x oversubscription)"
|
|
||||||
treasury: "$6.1M USDC"
|
|
||||||
token_price: "$0.55"
|
|
||||||
monthly_allowance: "$100K"
|
|
||||||
governance: "Active futarchy governance + treasury subcommittee (DP-00001)"
|
|
||||||
competitors: []
|
|
||||||
built_on: ["Solana", "MetaDAO Autocrat"]
|
|
||||||
tags: ["ownership-coins", "futarchy", "treasury-management", "metadao-ecosystem"]
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Solomon
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Overview
|
|
||||||
One of the first successful Futardio launches. Raised $8M through the pro-rata mechanism ($103M committed = 13x oversubscription). Notable for implementing structured treasury management through futarchy — the treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) established operational governance scaffolding on top of futarchy's market-based decision mechanism.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Current State
|
|
||||||
- **Product**: USDv — yield-bearing stablecoin. YaaS (Yield-as-a-Service) streams yield to approved USDv holders, LP positions, and treasury balances without wrappers or vaults.
|
|
||||||
- **Governance**: Active futarchy governance through MetaDAO Autocrat. Treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) passed March 9, 2026 (cleared 1.5% TWAP threshold by +2.22%). Moves up to $150K USDC into segregated legal budget, nominates 4 subcommittee designates.
|
|
||||||
- **Treasury**: Actively managed through buybacks and strategic allocations. DP-00001 is step 1 of 3: (1) legal/pre-formation, (2) SOLO buyback framework, (3) treasury account activation.
|
|
||||||
- **YaaS status**: Closed beta — LP volume crossed $1M, OroGold GOLD/USDv pool delivering 59.6% APY. First deployment drove +22.05% LP APY with 3.5x pool growth.
|
|
||||||
- **Significance**: Test case for whether futarchy-governed organizations converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Timeline
|
## Timeline
|
||||||
- **2025-11-14** — Solomon launches via Futardio ($103M committed, $8M raised)
|
|
||||||
- **2026-02/03** — Lab Notes series (Ranga documenting progress publicly)
|
|
||||||
- **2026-03** — Treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) — formalized operational governance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Competitive Position
|
- 2025-11: Solomon launches with a unique raise structure.
|
||||||
Solomon is not primarily a competitive entity — it's an existence proof. It demonstrates that futarchy-governed organizations can raise capital, manage treasuries, and create operational governance structures. The key question is whether the futarchy layer adds genuine value beyond what a normal startup with transparent treasury management would achieve.
|
- 2026-03: Solomon's USDv stablecoin achieves composable yield.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Investment Thesis
|
|
||||||
Solomon validates the ownership coin model: futarchy governance + permissionless capital formation + active treasury management. If Solomon outperforms comparable projects without futarchy governance, it strengthens the case for market-based governance as an organizational primitive.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Thesis status:** WATCHING
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Relationship to KB
|
|
||||||
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] — Solomon's DP-00001 is evidence for this
|
|
||||||
- [[ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match]] — Solomon tests this
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Entities:
|
|
||||||
- [[metadao]] — parent platform
|
|
||||||
- [[futardio]] — launch mechanism
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Topics:
|
|
||||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,15 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/634r63NH2qbTrSVyLieC3Ab3YKaEfoGnCLM8idZMEycE"
|
||||||
date: 2025-11-14
|
date: 2025-11-14
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: processed
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana]
|
||||||
event_type: launch
|
event_type: launch
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||||
|
claims_extracted: ["solomon-usdv-achieves-composable-yield-through-non-rebasing-stablecoin-architecture-enabling-defi-integration-at-par.md", "solomon-futardio-raise-structure-allocates-20-percent-to-metadao-for-token-liquidity-seeding-creating-platform-value-capture.md"]
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims about Solomon's composable stablecoin architecture and Futardio raise structure. Both claims rated experimental (single-source, self-reported metrics). Enriched two existing MetaDAO/internet-finance claims with Solomon launch data. Updated Solomon and Futardio entity timelines. Key architectural innovation is separating yield accrual (sUSDv/YaaS) from unit of account (USDv at $1) to solve DeFi composability problem. Raise structure creates platform value capture for MetaDAO through 20% liquidity allocation. Team capped raise at $8M despite $102.9M committed, suggesting demand management rather than extraction maximization."
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Details
|
## Launch Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -69,3 +75,14 @@ Solomon is the first stablecoin system that can sit everywhere money sits. Walle
|
||||||
- Version: v0.6
|
- Version: v0.6
|
||||||
- Final raise: $8,000,000.00
|
- Final raise: $8,000,000.00
|
||||||
- Closed: 2025-11-18
|
- Closed: 2025-11-18
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Solomon USDv stablecoin maintains $1 peg through two-way market making without rebasing
|
||||||
|
- sUSDv staking token accrues yield from basis trade strategy (long spot, short perp) and T-bills
|
||||||
|
- Yield-as-a-Service (YaaS) delivers yield directly to USDv holders without staking requirement
|
||||||
|
- Solomon ran closed beta for one year with seven figures TVL
|
||||||
|
- Solomon custody segregated with Ceffu, assets carry insurance coverage
|
||||||
|
- Solomon Solana programs audited, restricted to custody transfers only, admin operations via Squads multisig
|
||||||
|
- SOLO token mint: SoLo9oxzLDpcq1dpqAgMwgce5WqkRDtNXK7EPnbmeta
|
||||||
|
- Futardio launch address: 634r63NH2qbTrSVyLieC3Ab3YKaEfoGnCLM8idZMEycE
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue