diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md
index 8f864e278..cfca6cf88 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
@@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform
 *Source: [[2024-06-05-futardio-proposal-fund-futuredaos-token-migrator]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
 
 FutureDAO's token migrator extends the unruggable ICO concept to community takeovers of existing projects. The tool uses a 60% presale threshold as the success condition: if presale reaches 60% of target, migration proceeds with new LP creation; if not, all SOL is refunded and new tokens are burned. This applies the conditional market logic to post-launch rescues rather than just initial launches. The proposal describes the tool as addressing 'Rugged Projects: Preserve community and restore value in projects affected by rug pulls' and 'Hostile Takeovers: Enabling projects to acquire other projects and empowering communities to assert control over failed project teams.' The mechanism creates on-chain enforcement of community coordination thresholds for takeover scenarios, extending MetaDAO's unruggable ICO pattern to the secondary market for abandoned projects.
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+
+MetaDAO is undergoing strategic transition from curated to permissionless launches. Revenue data since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M total (60% from Futarchy AMM fees, 40% from Meteora LP positions). Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed, with team acknowledging they 'fell short on cadence.' This revenue volatility is driving the permissionless transition, described as 'necessary experiment to increase throughput and validate platform scalability.' Proposed 'verified launch' system would layer reputation-based trust signals on permissionless infrastructure—projects referred by trusted ecosystem partners get verification badge similar to X's blue check.
 
 ---
 
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md b/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md
index c9c640f78..4263bb9f9 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md	
@@ -38,16 +38,22 @@ The "Claude Code founders" framing is significant. The solo AI-native builder 
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+*Source: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
 
 MycoRealms demonstrates 72-hour permissionless raise window on Futardio for $125,000 USDC with automatic deployment: if target reached, treasury/spending limits/liquidity deploy automatically; if target missed, full refunds execute automatically. No gatekeepers, no due diligence bottleneck — market pricing determines success. This compresses what would traditionally be a multi-month fundraising process (pitch deck preparation, investor meetings, term sheet negotiation, legal documentation, wire transfers) into a 3-day permissionless window. Notably, this includes physical infrastructure (mushroom farm) not just digital projects.
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+*Source: 2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
 
 Futardio cult raised $11.4M in under 24 hours through MetaDAO's futarchy platform (launched 2026-03-03, closed 2026-03-04), confirming sub-day fundraising timelines for futarchy-governed launches. This provides concrete timing data supporting the compression thesis: traditional meme coin launches through centralized platforms typically require days to weeks for comparable capital formation.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+
+MetaDAO's revenue cadence problem provides empirical evidence for why permissionless is necessary for consistent capital formation. With curated launches, revenue declined sharply when ICO activity slowed (mid-December 2025 onward), demonstrating that selectivity creates feast-or-famine dynamics. The team explicitly stated 'without steady new launches, revenue can't grow,' framing permissionless as operationally required for platform sustainability. This shows that compression of fundraising timelines requires volume consistency, which curated models cannot provide.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-positions-futarchy-as-coordination-layer-across-ecosystem-of-governed-entities.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-positions-futarchy-as-coordination-layer-across-ecosystem-of-governed-entities.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f241623e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-positions-futarchy-as-coordination-layer-across-ecosystem-of-governed-entities.md
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "MetaDAO aims to become meta-layer coordinating capital and governance across multiple futarchy-governed organizations"
+confidence: speculative
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital reports on MetaDAO vision (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+secondary_domains: [mechanisms]
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's DAO-of-DAOs vision positions futarchy as a coordination layer across an ecosystem of governed entities
+
+MetaDAO's long-term vision extends beyond being a launch platform to becoming a "meta DAO"—a DAO of DAOs that coordinates capital and governance across an ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities. This represents an architectural aspiration about how decentralized organizations could compose: rather than isolated governance silos, futarchy-governed entities would share infrastructure and potentially coordinate decisions through a meta-governance layer.
+
+The vision statement includes the claim that "futarchy will replace C-suite decision-making," positioning the mechanism as a general-purpose alternative to traditional corporate governance. If this thesis holds, MetaDAO would function as the coordination substrate—providing shared infrastructure (Autocrat program, conditional markets, settlement mechanisms) while individual DAOs maintain sovereignty over their specific domains.
+
+This "DAO of DAOs" model implies several structural properties:
+1. Shared liquidity across conditional markets (capital efficiency through pooling)
+2. Reputation and trust networks that span multiple governed entities
+3. Meta-governance decisions about platform-level parameters and upgrades
+4. Potential for cross-DAO coordination on decisions with spillover effects
+
+The vision remains largely aspirational. Current MetaDAO activity focuses on individual project launches, not inter-DAO coordination. The mechanism for how meta-governance would work—how MetaDAO itself makes decisions about the ecosystem—is unclear. The claim that futarchy will "replace C-suite decision-making" is bold but lacks evidence beyond MetaDAO's own adoption.
+
+This positions MetaDAO as an infrastructure play rather than just a launchpad. If the ecosystem grows, the platform captures value through fees across all governed entities while individual DAOs capture value from their specific operations.
+
+## Evidence
+- MetaDAO described as "meta DAO" — DAO of DAOs
+- Vision: "coordinating capital and governance across ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities"
+- Claim: "futarchy will replace C-suite decision-making"
+- Current platform provides shared infrastructure (Autocrat, conditional markets)
+
+## Challenges
+- No evidence of actual inter-DAO coordination happening yet
+- Unclear how meta-governance decisions would be made
+- "Replace C-suite" claim is aspirational without supporting evidence
+- Coordination mechanisms between DAOs not specified
+- Risk of centralization if MetaDAO becomes single point of control
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
+- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]]
+- [[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles]]
+- [[collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a moral preference]]
+
+Topics:
+- domains/internet-finance/_map
+- core/mechanisms/_map
+- foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-validates-permissionless-necessity-because-curated-model-creates-feast-or-famine-dynamics.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-validates-permissionless-necessity-because-curated-model-creates-feast-or-famine-dynamics.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..893036426
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-validates-permissionless-necessity-because-curated-model-creates-feast-or-famine-dynamics.md
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Sharp revenue decline since mid-December 2025 demonstrates that curated launches cannot sustain consistent platform revenue"
+confidence: likely
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital reports on MetaDAO financials (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's revenue cadence problem validates permissionless necessity because curated model creates feast-or-famine dynamics
+
+MetaDAO's revenue performance since launch demonstrates a structural problem with curated launch models: without steady deal flow, platform revenue becomes unpredictable and volatile. Since the Futarchy AMM went live on October 10, 2025, MetaDAO generated approximately $2.4 million in total revenue (60% from Futarchy AMM fees, 40% from Meteora LP positions). However, revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed.
+
+The team explicitly acknowledged this cadence problem, stating they "fell short on cadence over the past few weeks." This admission reveals the core tension: curated models prioritize founder quality and long-term alignment, but this selectivity creates revenue gaps when deal flow slows. The platform's revenue is directly coupled to launch frequency, creating feast-or-famine dynamics.
+
+This revenue volatility provides empirical evidence for why MetaDAO is pursuing permissionless launches. The curated approach was "necessary to validate the product," but the clear tradeoff emerged: "without steady new launches, revenue can't grow." The permissionless transition is described as "a necessary experiment to increase throughput and validate platform scalability"—language that frames it as operationally required, not just strategically desirable.
+
+This pattern likely generalizes to other curated launch platforms. High selectivity improves average project quality but creates revenue unpredictability. Permissionless models sacrifice per-project quality for volume consistency, shifting the curation burden to market mechanisms and reputation systems.
+
+## Evidence
+- Total revenue since October 10, 2025: ~$2.4M (60% Futarchy AMM, 40% Meteora LP)
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025
+- Team statement: "MetaDAO has fallen short on cadence over the past few weeks"
+- Explicit acknowledgment: "without steady new launches, revenue can't grow"
+- Permissionless launches described as "necessary experiment to increase throughput"
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
+- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing]]
+- futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility
+
+Topics:
+- domains/internet-finance/_map
+- core/mechanisms/_map
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-system-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure-creating-curation-without-gatekeeping.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-system-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure-creating-curation-without-gatekeeping.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e148778ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-system-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure-creating-curation-without-gatekeeping.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Proposed trust layer uses referrals from ecosystem partners to signal quality while maintaining permissionless access"
+confidence: speculative
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital reports on MetaDAO strategic direction (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's proposed verified launch system layers reputation trust on permissionless infrastructure to create curation without gatekeeping
+
+MetaDAO's proposed "verified launch" mechanism attempts to solve the curation-versus-permissionless tradeoff by implementing a reputation layer on top of open access. Projects can launch permissionlessly, but those referred by trusted partners or well-regarded ecosystem members receive a "verified" designation—analogous to X's blue checkmark system.
+
+This design separates access rights from quality signaling. Any project can raise capital through the platform, but the verification layer helps investors filter signal from noise without requiring centralized gatekeeping. The mechanism relies on social graph trust propagation: established ecosystem participants stake reputation by referring projects.
+
+The strategic context makes this significant: MetaDAO's curated model created revenue volatility as launch cadence fluctuated. Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed, with the team acknowledging they "fell short on cadence over the past few weeks." The permissionless transition with verification layer is positioned as "a necessary experiment to increase throughput and validate platform scalability."
+
+This represents a novel coordination design—using social proof and reputation networks to create soft curation while maintaining the capital efficiency of permissionless launches. The mechanism hasn't been implemented yet, so effectiveness remains unproven.
+
+## Evidence
+- MetaDAO publicly debated curated versus permissionless models in early 2026
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 tracking ICO activity slowdown
+- Team described permissionless launches as "necessary experiment to increase throughput"
+- Proposed "verified launch" system explicitly compared to X's verification model
+- Projects would be flagged as verified based on referrals from "trusted partners or well-regarded ecosystem members"
+
+## Challenges
+- No implementation details on how referral trust networks would be structured
+- Unclear how verification status affects market dynamics or investor behavior
+- Risk that "verified" becomes meaningless if standards aren't maintained
+- Social graph trust can concentrate around existing power structures
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
+- futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility
+- Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding
+
+Topics:
+- domains/internet-finance/_map
+- core/mechanisms/_map
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
index eeca6257d..47fb3c79d 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
@@ -7,9 +7,15 @@ date: 2026-02-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
 priority: high
 tags: [metadao, permissionless, curation, launchpad, strategic-reset, mechanism-design]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+claims_extracted: ["metadao-verified-launch-system-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure-creating-curation-without-gatekeeping.md", "metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-validates-permissionless-necessity-because-curated-model-creates-feast-or-famine-dynamics.md", "metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-positions-futarchy-as-coordination-layer-across-ecosystem-of-governed-entities.md"]
+enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Three mechanism design claims extracted: (1) verified launch as reputation layer on permissionless infrastructure, (2) revenue cadence as forcing function for permissionless transition, (3) DAO of DAOs vision as coordination architecture. Four enrichments applied to existing claims about MetaDAO platform, permissionless necessity, Teleocap validation, and capital formation compression. MetaDAO entity updated with strategic transition timeline. Colosseum entity created for STAMP reference. The 'DAO of DAOs' vision is speculative—aspirational language without implementation details—but represents significant architectural claim about futarchy as coordination substrate."
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -45,11 +51,18 @@ MetaDAO has publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to per
 **Why this matters:** The curated-to-permissionless transition is the key strategic inflection for MetaDAO. The "verified launch" mechanism is a novel coordination design — reputation-based trust networks layered on permissionless infrastructure. This is mechanism design, not just business strategy.
 **What surprised me:** Revenue declined sharply since mid-December — the cadence problem is real and urgent. The curated model creates feast-or-famine dynamics. This is the strongest evidence that permissionless scaling is necessary, not just desirable.
 **What I expected but didn't find:** Specific timeline for permissionless launch rollout. Details on how the "verified launch" trust layer would work mechanistically.
-**KB connections:** [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]] — MetaDAO's permissionless transition validates the Teleocap design thesis.
+**KB connections:** Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding — MetaDAO's permissionless transition validates the Teleocap design thesis.
 **Extraction hints:** Claim about verified launches as mechanism design compromise. Claim about revenue cadence as forcing function for permissionless transition.
 **Context:** Blockworks article (behind 403 paywall) is the primary source. KuCoin and Delphi Digital summaries corroborate. The "strategic reset" was flagged in Session 1 but details were unknown.
 
 ## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
-PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding
 WHY ARCHIVED: The curated → permissionless transition with verified trust layer is a novel mechanism design. Revenue cadence problem validates why permissionless is necessary. The "DAO of DAOs" vision directly relates to MetaDAO's platform thesis.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) verified launch as mechanism design (reputation trust + permissionless infrastructure), (2) revenue cadence as evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) "DAO of DAOs" vision as attractor state.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- MetaDAO Futarchy AMM launched October 10, 2025
+- Total revenue since launch: ~$2.4M (60% Futarchy AMM, 40% Meteora LP)
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025
+- Two key catalysts identified: permissionless launches + Colosseum's STAMP