inbox/archive/2026-03-01-multiple-creator-economy-owned-revenue-statistics.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Aggregated statistics from multiple 2026 creator economy reports.
 **Why this matters:** The 189% income premium for owned-revenue creators vs platform-dependent creators is the strongest aggregate evidence that value capture fundamentally differs based on distribution ownership. This isn't about individual outliers (MrBeast, Swift) — it's a statistical pattern across the creator economy.
 **What surprised me:** The platform vulnerability numbers — 42% of YouTube creators would lose $50K+ if they lost access. This quantifies the distributor leverage that community-owned distribution avoids.
 **What I expected but didn't find:** Causal direction. Do creators earn more BECAUSE they own their distribution, or do high-earning creators TEND to build owned distribution because they can afford to? Selection bias is a real concern.
-**KB connections:** [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]], [[when profits disappear at one layer of a value chain they emerge at an adjacent layer through the conservation of attractive profits]]
+**KB connections:** value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework, [[when profits disappear at one layer of a value chain they emerge at an adjacent layer through the conservation of attractive profits]]
 **Extraction hints:** Claim about owned-revenue creators earning 189% more (but note selection bias caveat). Claim about platform vulnerability quantification.
 **Context:** Multiple statistical compilation sources. Individual data points have varying reliability — treat as directional rather than precise.