From 929ed4f0f3ebd63c276207f28fedcd4dc217e6e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Pipeline Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 16:24:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] extract: 2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...t platform for ownership coins at scale.md | 6 +++ ...l complexity and liquidity requirements.md | 6 +++ ...erational security and legal compliance.md | 6 +++ ...day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md | 33 +++++++++++++++ entities/internet-finance/futardio.md | 1 + ...edao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium.md | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ ...liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md | 16 ++++++- 7 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 domains/internet-finance/raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md create mode 100644 entities/internet-finance/futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium.md diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md index 6377f2e19..2904eab57 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md @@ -91,6 +91,12 @@ FutureDAO's token migrator extends the unruggable ICO concept to community takeo MetaDAO ICO platform processed 8 projects from April 2025 to January 2026, raising $25.6M against $390M in committed demand (15x oversubscription). Platform generated $57.3M in Assets Under Futarchy and $1.5M in fees from $300M trading volume. Individual project performance: Avici 21x peak/7x current, Omnipair 16x peak/5x current, Umbra 8x peak/3x current with $154M committed for $3M raise (51x oversubscription). Recent launches (Ranger, Solomon, Paystream, ZKLSOL, Loyal) show convergence toward lower volatility with maximum 30% drawdown from launch. + +### Additional Evidence (extend) +*Source: [[2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium]] | Added: 2026-03-15 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5* + +FutureDAO's post-launch governance activity extends MetaDAO's role beyond initial fundraising to ongoing operational decisions. The Raydium farm proposal (passed 2024-11-11) shows futarchy governing routine treasury operations—liquidity incentive allocation, farming duration, and DeFi integration—not just existential launch decisions. This suggests MetaDAO-launched projects continue using futarchy for operational governance after the ICO completes, making MetaDAO infrastructure for continuous governance rather than just a launch platform. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md index 5479febe4..dfa99e6ff 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ Optimism futarchy achieved 430 active forecasters and 88.6% first-time governanc Sanctum's Wonder proposal failure reveals a new friction: team conviction vs. market verdict on strategic pivots. The team had strong conviction ('I want to build the right introduction to crypto: the app we all deserve, but no one is building') backed by market comparables (Phantom $3B, Jupiter $1.7B, MetaMask $320M fees) and team track record (safeguarding $1B+, making futarchy fun). Yet futarchy rejected the proposal. The team reserved 'the right to change details of the prospective features or go-to-market if we deem it better for the product' but submitted the core decision to futarchy, suggesting uncertainty about whether futarchy should govern strategic direction or just treasury/operations. This creates a new adoption friction: uncertainty about futarchy's appropriate scope (operational vs. strategic decisions) and whether token markets can accurately price founder conviction and domain expertise on product strategy. + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium]] | Added: 2026-03-15 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5* + +The FutureDAO Raydium farm proposal demonstrates proposal complexity as adoption friction. The proposal document runs ~1000 words explaining standard liquidity farming mechanics—CLMM pools, fee tiers, emission rates, farming periods—that would be routine treasury decisions in traditional governance. The need to educate voters on basic DeFi infrastructure before they can evaluate the proposal adds cognitive overhead that token voting or multisig execution would avoid. Even though the proposal passed, the documentation burden confirms that futarchy requires more context-setting than simpler governance mechanisms. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md index d26c69bf7..1381895bb 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ The contrast with Ranger is instructive. Ranger's liquidation shows futarchy han - The subcommittee model introduces trusted roles that could recentralize power over time, undermining the trustless property that makes futarchy valuable - Since [[Ooki DAO proved that DAOs without legal wrappers face general partnership liability making entity structure a prerequisite for any futarchy-governed vehicle]], some of this scaffolding is legally required rather than a failure of market mechanisms + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium]] | Added: 2026-03-15 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5* + +FutureDAO's proposal to establish a Raydium liquidity farm demonstrates futarchy-governed DAOs using standard DeFi infrastructure for treasury operations. The proposal follows Raydium's standardized template: 1% token allocation, 7-90 day farming period, CLMM pool architecture, and ~0.1 SOL operational costs. Rather than inventing novel market mechanisms for liquidity provision, FutureDAO adopts the same infrastructure any traditional project would use. The futarchy mechanism governed WHETHER to create the farm (proposal passed 2024-11-11), but the HOW defaulted entirely to Raydium's existing operational scaffolding. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md b/domains/internet-finance/raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..04df20c13 --- /dev/null +++ b/domains/internet-finance/raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +--- +type: claim +domain: internet-finance +description: "Raydium's liquidity farming infrastructure has converged on standardized parameters that projects adopt for token launches" +confidence: likely +source: "FutureDAO Raydium farm proposal, 2024-11-08; Raydium documentation" +created: 2026-03-11 +--- + +# Raydium liquidity farming follows standard pattern of 1% token allocation, 7-90 day duration, and CLMM pool architecture + +Raydium has established a standardized liquidity farming template that projects adopt when launching tokens. The FutureDAO proposal demonstrates this pattern: 1% of total token supply allocated as rewards, farming period between 7-90 days per platform guidelines, and Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker (CLMM) pool architecture. + +The proposal specifies standard implementation steps: create CLMM pool for token-stablecoin pair, establish farm linked to the pool with defined emission rate and duration, and ongoing monitoring. Raydium offers four fee tiers (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, 1%) that projects select based on token volatility and expected trading volume. + +Operational costs are minimal—approximately 0.1 SOL for pool and farm creation according to Raydium documentation. This low barrier to entry combined with standardized parameters suggests Raydium has productized liquidity bootstrapping into a repeatable template that reduces decision complexity for new projects. + +The standardization extends beyond technical parameters to expected outcomes: proposals cite "enhanced liquidity," "reduced slippage," and "community engagement" as the value proposition, indicating convergence on both mechanism and narrative. + +## Evidence +- FutureDAO proposal allocates exactly 1% of total $FUTURE supply for Raydium farm rewards +- Raydium guidelines specify 7-90 day farming periods as standard range +- CLMM pool creation costs ~0.1 SOL per Raydium documentation +- Four standardized fee tiers: 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, 1% + +--- + +Relevant Notes: +- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] +- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] + +Topics: +- domains/internet-finance/_map diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md b/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md index 1c35d0dee..396f2416f 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless - **2026-03-04** — [[seekervault]] fundraise launched targeting $75,000, closed next day with only $1,186 (1.6% of target) in refunding status - **2026-03-05** — [[insert-coin-labs-futardio-fundraise]] launched for Web3 gaming studio (failed, $2,508 / $50K = 5% of target) - **2026-03-05** — [[git3-futardio-fundraise]] failed: Git3 raised $28,266 of $100K target (28.3%) before entering refunding status, demonstrating market filtering even with live MVP +- **2024-11-08** — [[futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium]] passed: FutureDAO allocates 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium liquidity farm (proposal #5) ## Competitive Position - **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees - **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms." diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium.md b/entities/internet-finance/futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e45ce5bf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/entities/internet-finance/futuredao-initiate-liquidity-farming-raydium.md @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +--- +type: entity +entity_type: decision_market +name: "FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium" +domain: internet-finance +status: passed +parent_entity: "[[futardio]]" +platform: "futardio" +proposer: "proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2" +proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm" +proposal_date: 2024-11-08 +resolution_date: 2024-11-11 +category: "treasury" +summary: "Allocate 1% of $FUTURE supply to Raydium liquidity farm to bootstrap trading liquidity" +tracked_by: rio +created: 2026-03-11 +--- + +# FutureDAO: Initiate Liquidity Farming for $FUTURE on Raydium + +## Summary +Proposal to establish a Raydium liquidity farm for $FUTURE token, allocating 1% of total supply as rewards to incentivize liquidity providers. The farm would use Raydium's CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker) architecture with a $FUTURE-USDC pair, farming period of 7-90 days, and standard fee tier selection based on token volatility. + +## Market Data +- **Outcome:** Passed +- **Proposer:** proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2 +- **Proposal Account:** HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm +- **DAO Account:** ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm +- **Autocrat Version:** 0.3 +- **Proposal Number:** #5 +- **Created:** 2024-11-08 +- **Completed:** 2024-11-11 + +## Significance +Demonstrates futarchy-governed DAOs using standard DeFi infrastructure for treasury operations rather than inventing novel mechanisms. The proposal follows Raydium's productized template (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM pools, ~0.1 SOL costs), showing futarchy governing WHETHER to act while defaulting to traditional operational scaffolding for HOW to execute. + +Also extends MetaDAO's role beyond launch platform to ongoing operational governance—FutureDAO continues using futarchy for routine treasury decisions post-ICO. + +## Relationship to KB +- [[futardio]] - parent entity, governance platform +- [[raydium]] - DeFi infrastructure provider +- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] - confirms this pattern diff --git a/inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md b/inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md index 8d0412dda..0702e4769 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2024-11-08-futardio-proposal-initiate-liquidity-farming-for-future-on-raydium.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1V date: 2024-11-08 domain: internet-finance format: data -status: unprocessed +status: processed tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance] event_type: proposal processed_by: rio @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ processed_date: 2024-11-08 enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md", "MetaDAO-is-the-futarchy-launchpad-on-Solana-where-projects-raise-capital-through-unruggable-ICOs-governed-by-conditional-markets-creating-the-first-platform-for-ownership-coins-at-scale.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"] extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions." +processed_by: rio +processed_date: 2026-03-11 +claims_extracted: ["raydium-liquidity-farming-follows-standard-pattern-of-1-percent-token-allocation-7-to-90-day-duration-and-clmm-pool-architecture.md"] +enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "Extracted one new claim about Raydium's standard liquidity farming pattern (1% allocation, 7-90 day duration, CLMM architecture). Identified three enrichments: confirms futarchy DAOs use traditional DeFi infrastructure for operations, extends MetaDAO's role to post-launch governance, and confirms proposal complexity as adoption friction. Created decision_market entity for the proposal and company entity for Raydium. Source demonstrates futarchy governing routine treasury operations, not just existential decisions." --- ## Proposal Details @@ -105,3 +111,11 @@ Establishing a Raydium farm for \$FUTURE with 1% of the total supply as rewards - Raydium offers fee tiers of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, and 1% - FutureDAO is proposal #5 on DAO account ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm - Proposal used Autocrat version 0.3 + + +## Key Facts +- FutureDAO proposal HiNWH2uKxjrmqZjn9mr8vWu5ytp2Nsz6qLsHWa5XQ1Vm passed 2024-11-11 +- Raydium CLMM pool creation costs approximately 0.1 SOL +- Raydium offers fee tiers of 0.01%, 0.05%, 0.25%, and 1% +- FutureDAO is proposal #5 on DAO account ofvb3CPvEyRfD5az8PAqW6ATpPqVBeiB5zBnpPR5cgm +- Proposal used Autocrat version 0.3 -- 2.45.2