extract: 2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management #971
4 changed files with 64 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ Proposal #3 on MetaDAO (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs) ra
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Production deployment data from futard.io shows Proposal #1 on DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY using Autocrat version 0.3, with proposal created, ended, and completed all on 2025-03-05. This confirms operational use of the Autocrat v0.3 implementation in live governance.
|
Production deployment data from futard.io shows Proposal #1 on DAO account De8YzDKudqgeJXqq6i7q82AgxxrQ1JXXfMgouQuPyhY using Autocrat version 0.3, with proposal created, ended, and completed all on 2025-03-05. This confirms operational use of the Autocrat v0.3 implementation in live governance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dean's List DAO treasury proposal required TWAP > 3% for passage, with the proposal arguing potential 5-20% FDV increase from de-risking would exceed this threshold. Proposal completed December 5, 2024 after 3-day duration.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ Single-case evidence limits generalizability. The failure could be specific to:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
However, this case provides concrete evidence that [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] operates even when the economics appear favorable.
|
However, this case provides concrete evidence that [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] operates even when the economics appear favorable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dean's List treasury proposal passed despite requiring active market participation to price a 40 percentage point survival probability improvement. The proposal explicitly calculated that potential FDV increase (5-20%) exceeded the 3% TWAP threshold, suggesting the economics were clearly favorable yet still required formal market validation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"validation_stats": {
|
||||||
|
"total": 2,
|
||||||
|
"kept": 0,
|
||||||
|
"fixed": 5,
|
||||||
|
"rejected": 2,
|
||||||
|
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||||
|
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||||
|
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate gov",
|
||||||
|
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||||
|
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:stripped_wiki_link:coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futar",
|
||||||
|
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-tr"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"rejections": [
|
||||||
|
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:no_frontmatter",
|
||||||
|
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:no_frontmatter"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||||
|
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/4gaJ8bi1gpNEx6xSSsepjVBM6GXqTDfLbiUbzXbARHW
|
||||||
date: 2024-12-02
|
date: 2024-12-02
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: enrichment
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||||
event_type: proposal
|
event_type: proposal
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy-proposals-with-favorable-economics-can-fail-due-to-participation-friction-not-market-disagreement.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Proposal Details
|
## Proposal Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -122,3 +126,15 @@ This strategy ensures financial stability while signaling prudence to investors,
|
||||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||||
- Completed: 2024-12-05
|
- Completed: 2024-12-05
|
||||||
- Ended: 2024-12-05
|
- Ended: 2024-12-05
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Dean's List DAO treasury valued at $75,000-$87,000 at $350 SOL (excluding DEAN token)
|
||||||
|
- Proposal account: 4gaJ8bi1gpNEx6xSSsepjVBM6GXqTDfLbiUbzXbARHW1
|
||||||
|
- Proposal number: 5
|
||||||
|
- DAO account: 9TKh2yav4WpSNkFV2cLybrWZETBWZBkQ6WB6qV9Nt9dJ
|
||||||
|
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||||
|
- Proposal completed: 2024-12-05
|
||||||
|
- Conservative FDV used in proposal: $500,000
|
||||||
|
- Required TWAP threshold for passage: >3%
|
||||||
|
- Proposal status: Passed
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue