inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.json

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 3,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 9,
+    "rejected": 3,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
+      "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
+      "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:stripped_wiki_link:single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-",
+      "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
+      "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:emergent-misalignment-arises-naturally-from-reward-hacking-a",
+      "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:stripped_wiki_link:the-specification-trap-means-any-values-encoded-at-training-",
+      "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
+      "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arr",
+      "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:stripped_wiki_link:community-centred-norm-elicitation-surfaces-alignment-target"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "alignment-impossibility-converges-across-three-mathematical-traditions.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "reward-hacking-is-globally-inevitable-in-finite-sample-regimes.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "consensus-driven-objective-reduction-is-the-practical-pathway-out-of-alignment-impossibility.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-15"
+}

inbox/archive/2025-01-13-futardio-proposal-should-jto-vault-be-added-to-tiprouter-ncn.md

@@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11U
 date: 2025-01-13
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
 event_type: proposal
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-15
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Proposal Details
@@ -53,3 +56,13 @@ If approved, this proposal would sanction the addition of a JTO Vault to the Tip
 - Autocrat version: 0.3
 - Completed: 2025-01-18
 - Ended: 2025-01-18
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Jito DAO proposal CJW4iZPT14sVNzoc4Yibx1LbnY12sA75gZCP9HZk11UA was proposal number 1 for the DAO
+- The proposal used Autocrat version 0.3
+- DAO account: B3PDBD7NCsJyxSdSDFEK38oNKZMBrgkg46TuqqkgAwPp
+- Proposer account: proPaC9tVZEsmgDtNhx15e7nSpoojtPD3H9h4GqSqB2
+- Proposal created 2025-01-13, completed and ended 2025-01-18
+- Discussion occurred on Discord at discord.gg/QtGpxC52Kw
+- JIP-10 forum discussion: https://forum.jito.network/t/jip-10-decision-market-on-whether-to-adopt-jto-in-the-tiprouter-ncn-protocol-development/463

inbox/archive/2025-02-00-agreement-complexity-alignment-barriers.md

@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 tags: [impossibility-result, agreement-complexity, reward-hacking, multi-objective, safety-critical-slices]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-15
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 3 claims, 3 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -48,3 +52,9 @@ Formalizes AI alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem where N agents
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Third independent impossibility result from multi-objective optimization — convergent evidence from three mathematical traditions strengthens our core impossibility claim
 EXTRACTION HINT: The convergence of three impossibility traditions AND the "consensus-driven reduction" pathway are both extractable
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Paper presented as oral presentation at AAAI 2026 Special Track on AI Alignment
+- Formalizes AI alignment as multi-objective optimization problem with N agents and M objectives
+- Paper identifies 'No-Free-Lunch principle' for alignment: irreducible computational costs regardless of method sophistication