---
type: source
source_type: governance-proposals
title: "MetaDAO Proposals 1-15 — Full Proposal Text"
date: 2026-03-23
domain: internet-finance
format: governance-document
status: enrichment
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: research-direction
tags: [metadao, governance, proposals, decision-markets]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-25
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
---

**Proposal 1: Develop a LST Vote Market?**

Date:

Volume: 

Result: Pass 

**Overview**

The Meta-DAO is awakening.

Given that the Meta-DAO is a fundamentally new kind of organization, it lacks legitimacy. To gain legitimacy, we need to first *prove that the model works*. I believe that the best way to do that is by building profit-turning products under the Meta-DAO umbrella.

Here, we propose the first one: an[[ LST bribe platform]{.underline}](https://twitter.com/durdenwannabe/status/1683150792843464711). This platform would allow MNDE and mSOL holders to earn extra yield by[[ directing their stake]{.underline}](https://docs.marinade.finance/marinade-products/directed-stake#snapshot-system) to validators who pay them. A bribe market already exists, but it\s


## Key Facts
- MetaDAO Proposal 1 (LST Vote Market) passed
- Proposal 1 proposed building an LST bribe platform for MNDE and mSOL holders
- The proposal framed product development as a legitimacy-building mechanism for the Meta-DAO
- A competing bribe market already existed at the time of the proposal