---
type: source
source_type: telegram-contribution
title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder add"
author: "@m3taversal"
date: 2026-03-30
domain: internet-finance
format: contribution
status: null-result
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: source-submission
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-30
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
---

# Source: Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder b

Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.

## Verbatim User Message

@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze

## Rio's Context

Proph3t statement on P2P Polymarket betting controversy — MetaDAO co-founder addresses P2P founder betting on own ICO outcome on Polymarket, states they would have pushed against it if known earlier, describes intervention approach. https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 — attributed to @m3taversal


## Key Facts
- P2P founder bet on their own ICO outcome on Polymarket in March 2026
- MetaDAO co-founder Proph3t stated they would have pushed against this if known earlier
- The incident required public statement and intervention from MetaDAO leadership