--- type: decision entity_type: decision_market name: "mtnCapital: Wind Down Operations" domain: internet-finance status: passed parent_entity: "[[mtncapital]]" platform: metadao proposal_date: 2025-09 resolution_date: 2025-09 category: liquidation summary: "First MetaDAO futarchy-governed liquidation — community voted to wind down operations and return capital at ~$0.604/MTN redemption rate" tracked_by: rio created: 2026-03-20 --- # mtnCapital: Wind Down Operations ## Summary The mtnCapital community voted via futarchy to wind down the fund's operations and return treasury capital to token holders. This was the **first futarchy-governed liquidation** on MetaDAO, preceding the Ranger Finance liquidation by approximately 6 months. ## Market Data - **Outcome:** Passed (wind-down approved) - **Redemption rate:** ~$0.604 per $MTN - **Duration:** ~September 2025 ## Evidence: NAV Arbitrage in Practice Theia Research executed the textbook NAV arbitrage strategy: - Bought 297K $MTN at average price of ~$0.485 (below redemption value) - Voted for wind-down via futarchy - Redeemed at ~$0.604 per token - Profit: ~$35K This demonstrates the mechanism described in [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]] working in reverse — the same arbitrage dynamics that prevent value extraction ALSO create a price floor at NAV. When token price < redemption value, rational actors buy and vote to liquidate, guaranteeing profit and enforcing the floor. @arihantbansal confirmed the mechanism works at small scale too: traded $100 in the pass market of the wind-down proposal, redeemed for $101 — "only possible with futarchy." ## Manipulation Concerns @_Dean_Machine (Nov 2025) flagged potential exploitation: "someone has been taking advantage, going as far back as the mtnCapital raise, trading, and redemption." Whether this constitutes manipulation or informed arbitrage correcting a mispricing depends on whether participants had material non-public information about the wind-down timing. ## Significance 1. **Orderly liquidation is possible.** Capital returned through futarchy mechanism without legal proceedings or team absconding. 2. **NAV floor is real.** The arbitrage opportunity (buy below NAV → vote to liquidate → redeem at NAV) was executed profitably. 3. **Liquidation sequence.** mtnCapital (orderly wind-down, ~Sep 2025) → Hurupay (failed minimum, Feb 2026) → Ranger Finance (contested liquidation, Mar 2026) — three different failure modes, all handled through the futarchy mechanism. ## Relationship to KB - [[mtncapital]] — parent entity - [[decision markets make majority theft unprofitable through conditional token arbitrage]] — NAV arbitrage is empirical confirmation - [[futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism that makes unruggable ICOs credible because investors can force full treasury return when teams materially misrepresent]] — first live test - [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — manipulation concerns test this claim