--- type: entity entity_type: decision_market name: "COAL: Establish Development Fund?" domain: internet-finance status: failed parent_entity: "coal" platform: "futardio" proposer: "AH7F2EPHXWhfF5yc7xnv1zPbwz3YqD6CtAqbCyE9dy7r" proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/DhY2YrMde6BxiqCrqUieoKt5TYzRwf2KYE3J2RQyQc7U" proposal_date: 2024-12-05 resolution_date: 2024-12-08 category: "treasury" summary: "Proposal to allocate 4.2% of mining emissions to a development fund for protocol development, community rewards, and marketing" tracked_by: rio created: 2026-03-11 --- # COAL: Establish Development Fund? ## Summary Proposal to establish a development fund through a 4.2% emissions allocation (472.5 COAL/day) to support protocol development, reward community contributions, and enable marketing initiatives. The allocation would increase total supply growth by 4.2% rather than reducing mining rewards. Failed after 3-day voting period. ## Market Data - **Outcome:** Failed - **Proposer:** AH7F2EPHXWhfF5yc7xnv1zPbwz3YqD6CtAqbCyE9dy7r - **Proposal Account:** DhY2YrMde6BxiqCrqUieoKt5TYzRwf2KYE3J2RQyQc7U - **DAO Account:** 3LGGRzLrgwhEbEsNYBSTZc5MLve1bw3nDaHzzfJMQ1PG - **Duration:** 2024-12-05 to 2024-12-08 - **Daily Allocation Proposed:** 472.5 COAL (4.2% of 11,250 COAL/day base rate) ## Significance This proposal tested community willingness to fund protocol development through inflation in a fair-launch token with no pre-mine or team allocation. The failure suggests miners prioritized emission purity over development funding, or that the 4.2% dilution was perceived as too high. The proposal included transparency commitments (weekly claims, public expenditure tracking, DAO-managed multisig) but still failed to achieve market support. The rejection creates a sustainability question for COAL: how does a zero-premine project fund ongoing development without either diluting miners or relying on volunteer labor? ## Relationship to KB - Related to [[futarchy-daos-require-mintable-governance-tokens-because-fixed-supply-treasuries-exhaust-without-issuance-authority-forcing-disruptive-token-architecture-migrations]] — COAL attempted to add issuance authority post-launch - Related to [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — this was a contested decision that still failed