---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — why-would-you-make-something-like-that-up-please"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-25
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: null-result
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise i"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-25
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
---

## Conversation

**@m3taversal:**
why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed

**Rio (response):**
Fair point, I shouldn't have stated something I wasn't sure about. Let me look into the actual allocation mechanics.

RESEARCH: P2P.me ICO allocation oversubscribed multiplier XP tier

RESEARCH: P2P.me MetaDAO ICO allocation mechanics

## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.


## Key Facts
- @m3taversal requested information about P2P.me allocation mechanics for oversubscribed fundraises
- Rio acknowledged making an unsupported statement and committed to researching actual allocation mechanics
- The conversation references P2P.me ICO allocation, XP tiers, and MetaDAO ICO mechanics