--- type: decision entity_type: decision_market name: "MetaDAO: Burn 99.3% of META in Treasury" domain: internet-finance status: passed tracked_by: rio created: 2026-03-11 last_updated: 2026-03-11 parent_entity: "[[metadao]]" platform: "futardio" proposer: "doctor.sol & rar3" proposal_url: "https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/ELwCkHt1U9VBpUFJ7qGoVMatEwLSr1HYj9q9t8JQ1NcU" proposal_date: 2024-03-03 resolution_date: 2024-03-08 category: treasury summary: "Burn ~979,000 of 982,464 treasury-held META tokens to reduce FDV and attract investors" tags: ["futarchy", "tokenomics", "treasury-management", "meta-token"] --- # MetaDAO: Burn 99.3% of META in Treasury ## Summary Proposal to burn approximately 99.3% of treasury-held META tokens (~979,000 of 982,464) to significantly reduce the Fully Diluted Valuation. Passed on Autocrat v0.1. The high FDV was perceived as discouraging investors and limiting participation in the futarchy experiment. Post-burn treasury: ~4,500 META valued at ~$4M plus ~$2M in META-USDC LP at the time ($880/META). Total META supply after burn: ~20,885. ## Market Data - **Outcome:** Passed (2024-03-08) - **Autocrat version:** 0.1 - **Key participants:** doctor.sol & rar3 (authors), Proph3t (executor) ## Significance One of the most consequential early MetaDAO governance decisions. The burn fundamentally changed MetaDAO's token economics — eliminating the treasury's ability to pay in META and forcing future operations to use USDC or market-purchase META. This created a natural scarcity signal but also meant the DAO would eventually need mintable tokens (which the proposal explicitly noted as a future possibility). The burn set the stage for the later token split and elastic supply debates. The proposal also reveals early futarchy dynamics: community members (not founders) proposed a radical tokenomics change, and the market approved it. This is a concrete example of futarchy enabling non-founder governance proposals with material treasury impact. ## Relationship to KB - [[metadao]] — governance decision, treasury management - [[futarchy enables trustless joint ownership by forcing dissenters to be bought out through pass markets]] — demonstrates market-governed treasury decisions - [[ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests]] — burn as extreme active management - [[futarchy-daos-require-mintable-governance-tokens-because-fixed-supply-treasuries-exhaust-without-issuance-authority-forcing-disruptive-token-architecture-migrations]] — this burn directly created the conditions that made mintable tokens necessary --- Relevant Entities: - [[metadao]] — parent organization - [[proph3t]] — executor Topics: - [[internet finance and decision markets]] ## Full Proposal Text *Source: futard.io, tabled 2024-03-03* #### Authors doctor.sol & rar3 ### Overview Burn ~99.3% `979,000` of treasury-held META tokens to significantly reduce the FDV, with the goal of making META more appealing to investors and enhancing community engagement. ### Background The META DAO is currently perceived to have a **high Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV)** due to the substantial amount of META tokens in the treasury, approximately `985,000 tokens`. This high FDV often **discourages potential investors and participants** from engaging with META, as they may perceive the investment as less attractive right from the start. ### Issue at Hand The primary concern is that the high FDV and treasury leads to the following problems: 1. **It encourages the use of META for expenses.** 2. **It lowers the attractiveness of META as an investment opportunity** at face value. 3. **It reduces the number of individuals willing to participate** in this futuarchy experiment. While a high FDV can deter less informed community members, which has its benefits, it also potentially wards off highly valuable community members who could contribute positively. #### Examples - https://imgur.com/a/KHMjJqo - https://imgur.com/a/3DH2jcO ### Proposed Solution We propose **burning approximately ~99.3%** of the META tokens -`99,000 tokens` - currently held in the DAO's treasury. This action is aimed at achieving the following outcomes: - **Elimination of Treasury META Payments**: Reduces the propensity to utilize $META from the treasury for proposal payments, promoting a healthier economic framework. - **Market-Based Token Acquisition**: Future requirements for $META tokens will necessitate market purchases, fostering demand and enhancing token value. - **Prioritization of $USDC and Revenue**: Shifting towards $USDC payments and focusing on revenue generation marks a move towards financial sustainability and robustness. - **Confidence Boost in META**: By significantly reducing the supply of META tokens, we signal a strong commitment to the token's value, **potentially leading to increased interest and participation in prop 10 execution.** - **Attracting a Broader Community**: Lowering the FDV makes META more attractive at face value, inviting a wider range of participants, including those who conduct thorough research and those attracted by the token's perceived tokenomics. ### Rundown of Numbers: - **Current Treasury:** `982,464 META tokens` - **After Burning:** `3,464 META tokens` - **Post-Proposition 10:** An expected `1,000 META tokens` should be added back from multisig after prop 10, ranging anywhere from `0 to 3,000 META`. - **Final Treasury:** After burning, the treasury would have around `4,500 META`, valued at `$4 million`, plus `$2 million in META-USDC LP` at todays price `$880 / META`. - **Total META supply:** `20,885` #### Note Adopting this proposal does **not permanently cap our token supply.** The community is currently discussing the possibility of transitioning to a **mintable token model**, which would provide the flexibility to issue more tokens if the need arises.