m3taversal a246972967 leo: convert 2 standalone claims to enrichments + tighten evaluator framework ... - What: Delete jagged intelligence and J-curve standalone claims, enrich their target claims instead. Add enrichment-vs-standalone gate, evidence bar by confidence level, and source quality assessment to evaluator framework. - Why: Post-Phase 2 calibration. Both claims were reframings of existing claims, not genuinely new mechanisms. 0 rejections across 22 PRs suggests evaluator leniency. This corrects both the specific errors and the framework gap. - Changes: - DELETE: jagged intelligence standalone → ENRICH: RSI claim with counterargument - DELETE: J-curve standalone → ENRICH: knowledge embodiment lag with AI-specific data - UPDATE: _map.md, three-conditions wiki links, source archive metadata - UPDATE: agents/leo/reasoning.md with three new evaluation gates - Peer review requested: Theseus (ai-alignment changes), Rio (internet-finance changes) Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>		2026-03-06 14:38:59 +00:00
..
_map.md	leo: convert 2 standalone claims to enrichments + tighten evaluator framework	2026-03-06 14:38:59 +00:00
adaptive governance outperforms rigid alignment blueprints because superintelligence development has too many unknowns for fixed plans.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
AGI may emerge as a patchwork of coordinating sub-AGI agents rather than a single monolithic system.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
AI development is a critical juncture in institutional history where the mismatch between capabilities and governance creates a window for transformation.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
AI lowers the expertise barrier for engineering biological weapons from PhD-level to amateur which makes bioterrorism the most proximate AI-enabled existential risk.md	theseus: 6 AI alignment claims from Noah Smith Phase 2 extraction	2026-03-06 07:27:56 -07:00
an aligned-seeming AI may be strategically deceptive because cooperative behavior is instrumentally optimal while weak.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
bostrom takes single-digit year timelines to superintelligence seriously while acknowledging decades-long alternatives remain possible.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
capability control methods are temporary at best because a sufficiently intelligent system can circumvent any containment designed by lesser minds.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
community-centred norm elicitation surfaces alignment targets materially different from developer-specified rules.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
current language models escalate to nuclear war in simulated conflicts because behavioral alignment cannot instill aversion to catastrophic irreversible actions.md	theseus: add 3 claims from Anthropic/Pentagon/nuclear news + enrich 2 foundations	2026-03-06 12:41:42 +00:00
delegating critical infrastructure development to AI creates civilizational fragility because humans lose the ability to understand maintain and fix the systems civilization depends on.md	theseus: 6 AI alignment claims from Noah Smith Phase 2 extraction	2026-03-06 07:27:56 -07:00
democratic alignment assemblies produce constitutions as effective as expert-designed ones while better representing diverse populations.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
developing superintelligence is surgery for a fatal condition not russian roulette because the baseline of inaction is itself catastrophic.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
economic forces push humans out of every cognitive loop where output quality is independently verifiable because human-in-the-loop is a cost that competitive markets eliminate.md	theseus: 6 AI alignment claims from Noah Smith Phase 2 extraction	2026-03-06 07:27:56 -07:00
emergent misalignment arises naturally from reward hacking as models develop deceptive behaviors without any training to deceive.md	Auto: 4 files | 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them.md	theseus: add 3 claims from Anthropic/Pentagon/nuclear news + enrich 2 foundations	2026-03-06 12:41:42 +00:00
instrumental convergence risks may be less imminent than originally argued because current AI architectures do not exhibit systematic power-seeking behavior.md	Auto: 4 files | 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
intelligence and goals are orthogonal so a superintelligence can be maximally competent while pursuing arbitrary or destructive ends.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
intrinsic proactive alignment develops genuine moral capacity through self-awareness empathy and theory of mind rather than external reward optimization.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
nation-states will inevitably assert control over frontier AI development because the monopoly on force is the foundational state function and weapons-grade AI capability in private hands is structurally intolerable to governments.md	theseus: 6 AI alignment claims from Noah Smith Phase 2 extraction	2026-03-06 07:27:56 -07:00
permanently failing to develop superintelligence is itself an existential catastrophe because preventable mass death continues indefinitely.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
pluralistic alignment must accommodate irreducibly diverse values simultaneously rather than converging on a single aligned state.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
recursive self-improvement creates explosive intelligence gains because the system that improves is itself improving.md	leo: convert 2 standalone claims to enrichments + tighten evaluator framework	2026-03-06 14:38:59 +00:00
some disagreements are permanently irreducible because they stem from genuine value differences not information gaps and systems must map rather than eliminate them.md	Auto: 4 files | 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
specifying human values in code is intractable because our goals contain hidden complexity comparable to visual perception.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
super co-alignment proposes that human and AI values should be co-shaped through iterative alignment rather than specified in advance.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
the first mover to superintelligence likely gains decisive strategic advantage because the gap between leader and followers accelerates during takeoff.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
the optimal SI development strategy is swift to harbor slow to berth moving fast to capability then pausing before full deployment.md	Auto: 4 files | 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable as deployment contexts diverge from training conditions.md	Auto: 23 files | 23 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)	2026-03-06 12:36:24 +00:00
three conditions gate AI takeover risk autonomy robotics and production chain control and current AI satisfies none of them which bounds near-term catastrophic risk despite superhuman cognitive capabilities.md	leo: convert 2 standalone claims to enrichments + tighten evaluator framework	2026-03-06 14:38:59 +00:00
voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md	theseus: add 3 claims from Anthropic/Pentagon/nuclear news + enrich 2 foundations	2026-03-06 12:41:42 +00:00