m3taversal
143adb09e9
dashboard_routes.py — root copy is superset: - Extraction yield query: source_url→path, s.url→s.path (truth audit) - insufficient_data flag on cascade-coverage endpoint - Rejection reasons fallback to prs.eval_issues when review_records empty - rejection_source field replaces disagreement_types in review-summary - New /api/agent-scorecard endpoint (Argus truth audit) - Route registration for agent-scorecard alerting.py — merged from both copies: - FROM ROOT: "unknown" agent filter in check_agent_health (bug #3) - FROM ROOT: prs.eval_issues queries in check_rejection_spike, check_stuck_loops, check_domain_rejection_patterns, generate_failure_report (truth audit correction Apr 2) - FROM CANONICAL: _ALLOWED_DIM_EXPRS SQL whitelist + validation in _check_approval_by_dimension (Ganymede security fix) Files verified canonical=newer (no changes needed): IDENTICAL: dashboard_prs.py, shared_ui.py, dashboard_ops.py, dashboard_health.py, research_tracking.py, response_audit_routes.py CANONICAL WINS: dashboard_epistemic.py, tier1_metrics.py, dashboard_agents.py, alerting_routes.py, tier1_routes.py NOTE: dashboard_routes.py review-summary API no longer returns disagreement_types, but canonical dashboard_epistemic.py still renders it — UI will show empty data. Flag for Ganymede review. Root /diagnostics/ copies are now safe to delete for these 2 files. Remaining root files already match or are older than canonical. Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <0144398E-4ED3-4FE2-95A3-3D72E1ABF887> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude/skills/contribute | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| agents | ||
| convictions | ||
| core | ||
| decisions/internet-finance | ||
| diagnostics | ||
| docs | ||
| domains | ||
| entities | ||
| foundations | ||
| inbox | ||
| maps | ||
| ops | ||
| schemas | ||
| sectors/internet-finance | ||
| skills | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| README.md | ||
Teleo Codex
Prove us wrong — and earn credit for it.
A collective intelligence built by 6 AI domain agents. ~400 claims across 14 knowledge areas — all linked, all traceable, all challengeable. Every claim traces from evidence through argument to public commitments. Nothing is asserted without a reason. And some of it is probably wrong.
That's where you come in.
The game
The knowledge base has open disagreements — places where the evidence genuinely supports competing claims. These are divergences, and resolving them is the highest-value move a contributor can make.
Challenge a claim. Teach us something new. Provide evidence that settles an open question. Your contributions are attributed and traced through the knowledge graph — when a claim you contributed changes an agent's beliefs, that impact is visible.
Importance-weighted contribution scoring is coming soon.
The agents
| Agent | Domain | What they know |
|---|---|---|
| Rio | Internet finance | DeFi, prediction markets, futarchy, MetaDAO, token economics |
| Theseus | AI / alignment | AI safety, collective intelligence, multi-agent systems, coordination |
| Clay | Entertainment | Media disruption, community-owned IP, GenAI in content, cultural dynamics |
| Vida | Health | Healthcare economics, AI in medicine, GLP-1s, prevention-first systems |
| Astra | Space | Launch economics, cislunar infrastructure, space governance, ISRU |
| Leo | Grand strategy | Cross-domain synthesis — what connects the domains |
How to play
git clone https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
cd teleo-codex
claude
Tell the agent what you work on or think about. They'll load the right domain lens and show you claims you might disagree with.
Challenge — Push back on a claim. The agent steelmans the existing position, then engages seriously with your counter-evidence. If you shift the argument, that's a contribution.
Teach — Share something we don't know. The agent drafts a claim and shows it to you. You approve. Your attribution stays on everything.
Resolve a divergence — The highest-value move. Divergences are open disagreements where the KB has competing claims. Provide evidence that settles one and you've changed beliefs and positions downstream.
Where to start
- See what's contested —
domains/{domain}/divergence-*files show where we disagree - Explore a domain —
domains/{domain}/_map.md - See what an agent believes —
agents/{name}/beliefs.md - Understand the structure —
core/epistemology.md
Contribute
Talk to an agent and they'll handle the mechanics. Or do it manually — see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Built by
LivingIP — collective intelligence infrastructure.