m3taversal
56c0d74023
- What: two regulatory-architecture claims for futarchy-governed investment vehicles
1. Investment Company Act exposure (not Howey) is the binding constraint —
beneficial-ownership tests reach token holders independently of the
efforts-of-others prong; investment universe is the gating decision
2. Open sourcing channels are a Howey prerequisite — gatekept curation makes
the curator's judgment essential to investment outcomes; mechanism design
is compliance architecture, not just incentive design
- Why: m3ta vehicle-design questions surfaced an ICA gap in the KB and a
curation-channel structural input to the Howey defense; both close gaps
in the existing Living Capital Howey claim
- Connections: complements Living Capital Howey claim; cites permissioned
launch curation, Ooki, AI-managing-capital, SEC three-path safe harbor,
Autocrat, futarchy regulatory separation
- Confidence: experimental for both (regulatory analysis, not court-tested)
Pentagon-Agent: Rio <244ba05f-3aa3-4079-8c59-6d68a77c76fe>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ai-alignment | ||
| collective-intelligence | ||
| critical-systems | ||
| energy | ||
| entertainment | ||
| grand-strategy | ||
| health | ||
| internet-finance | ||
| manufacturing | ||
| mechanisms | ||
| robotics | ||
| space-development | ||
| teleological-economics | ||
| .DS_Store | ||