36 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
36 lines
1.5 KiB
YAML
# Contribution Weights
|
|
#
|
|
# Global policy for how much each contributor role counts toward weighted scores.
|
|
# Used by the build pipeline to compute weighted_score in contributors.json
|
|
# and Contribution Index (CI) in reward-mechanism.md.
|
|
# Updated via PR — changes here affect all contributor profiles.
|
|
#
|
|
# Weights sum to 1.0. The build pipeline multiplies each contributor's role count
|
|
# by the corresponding weight, then sums across roles.
|
|
#
|
|
# Current rationale (2026-03-14, revised from Rio's mechanism design brief):
|
|
# - Sourcer = Extractor = Challenger at 0.25 each. This signals that finding
|
|
# the right source with a clear rationale, turning it into a structured claim,
|
|
# and challenging existing claims are equally valuable acts. Equal weighting
|
|
# prevents agent CI domination during bootstrap (agents fill extractor role,
|
|
# humans fill sourcer and challenger roles).
|
|
# - Synthesis connects claims across domains — high value but rare.
|
|
# - Review is essential but partially automated via the eval pipeline.
|
|
#
|
|
# Review after 6 months of data. If sourcer contributions turn out to be
|
|
# low-effort, the weight is too high. If challengers produce disproportionate
|
|
# belief changes, the weight is too low. Weights are policy, not physics.
|
|
|
|
role_weights:
|
|
sourcer: 0.25
|
|
extractor: 0.25
|
|
challenger: 0.25
|
|
synthesizer: 0.15
|
|
reviewer: 0.10
|
|
|
|
# Contribution Index (CI) leaderboard weights
|
|
# See core/reward-mechanism.md for full spec
|
|
ci_weights:
|
|
belief_movers: 0.30
|
|
challenge_champions: 0.30
|
|
connection_finders: 0.40
|