teleo-codex/foundations/collective-intelligence
m3taversal f884dde98a theseus: apply Leo's feedback — strengthen descriptions, add cross-links
- Claim 1: named 3 structural dimensions in description field
- Claim 2: added reframe to description, linked scalable oversight as contrast
- Claim 3: added challenged_by for reflexive capture, linked social enforcement tension
- All 3: added domain specialization and protocol design cross-links per Leo

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC>
2026-03-13 19:29:05 +00:00
..
_map.md
adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution when wrong challenges have real cost evaluation is structurally separated from contribution and confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty.md theseus: apply Leo's feedback — strengthen descriptions, add cross-links 2026-03-13 19:29:05 +00:00
centaur team performance depends on role complementarity not mere human-AI combination.md
collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability.md
collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a moral preference.md
collective intelligence within a purpose-driven community faces a structural tension because shared worldview correlates errors while shared purpose enables coordination.md
coordination failures arise from individually rational strategies that produce collectively irrational outcomes because the Nash equilibrium of non-cooperation dominates when trust and enforcement are absent.md
decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning because dispersed knowledge cannot be collected into a single mind but can be coordinated through price signals that encode local information into globally accessible indicators.md
designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm.md
Hayek argued that designed rules of just conduct enable spontaneous order of greater complexity than deliberate arrangement could achieve.md
humanity is a superorganism that can communicate but not yet think — the internet built the nervous system but not the brain.md
intelligence is a property of networks not individuals.md
mechanism design enables incentive-compatible coordination by constructing rules under which self-interested agents voluntarily reveal private information and take socially optimal actions.md
multipolar failure from competing aligned AI systems may pose greater existential risk than any single misaligned superintelligence.md
Ostrom proved communities self-govern shared resources when eight design principles are met without requiring state control or privatization.md
partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity.md
principal-agent problems arise whenever one party acts on behalf of another with divergent interests and unobservable effort because information asymmetry makes perfect contracts impossible.md
protocol design enables emergent coordination of arbitrary complexity as Linux Bitcoin and Wikipedia demonstrate.md
RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values.md
scalable oversight degrades rapidly as capability gaps grow with debate achieving only 50 percent success at moderate gaps.md
the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it.md
trial and error is the only coordination strategy humanity has ever used.md
universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective.md