cbdb588be8
- What: 3 claims from AAAI 2026 oral on alignment intractability 1. Reward hacking is globally inevitable (coverage gap formalization) 2. Alignment overhead is computationally irreducible (No-Free-Lunch theorem) 3. Consensus-driven objective reduction as tractable pathway - Why: Paper provides formal complexity-theoretic proofs for alignment impossibility results; distinct from existing Bostrom-based intractability claims and emergent-deception reward hacking claim - Connections: enriches [[emergent misalignment arises naturally from reward hacking]] with upstream mechanism; provides formal grounding for [[pluralistic alignment must accommodate irreducibly diverse values]]; supports [[safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms before scaling capability]] Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <C2A4E8F1-B3D7-4A92-9E15-7F3C8D2B1A60> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ai-alignment | ||
| entertainment | ||
| health | ||
| internet-finance | ||
| space-development | ||
| .DS_Store | ||