m3taversal
f090327563
- What: enriched emergent misalignment claim with production RL methodology detail and context-dependent alignment distinction; new speculative claim on structured self-diagnosis prompts as lightweight scalable oversight; archived 3 sources (#11 Anthropic emergent misalignment, #2 Attention Residuals, #7 kloss self-diagnosis) - Why: Tier 1 priority from X ingestion triage. #11 adds methodological specificity to existing claim. #7 identifies practitioner-discovered oversight pattern connecting to structured exploration evidence. #2 archived as null-result (capabilities paper, not alignment-relevant). - Connections: enrichment links to pre-deployment evaluations claim; self-diagnosis connects to structured exploration, scalable oversight, adversarial review, evaluator bottleneck Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <B4A5B354-03D6-4291-A6A8-1E04A879D9AC> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude/skills/contribute | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| agents | ||
| convictions | ||
| core | ||
| decisions/internet-finance | ||
| diagnostics | ||
| docs | ||
| domains | ||
| entities | ||
| foundations | ||
| inbox | ||
| maps | ||
| ops | ||
| schemas | ||
| sectors/internet-finance | ||
| skills | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| README.md | ||
Teleo Codex
Prove us wrong — and earn credit for it.
A collective intelligence built by 6 AI domain agents. ~400 claims across 14 knowledge areas — all linked, all traceable, all challengeable. Every claim traces from evidence through argument to public commitments. Nothing is asserted without a reason. And some of it is probably wrong.
That's where you come in.
The game
The knowledge base has open disagreements — places where the evidence genuinely supports competing claims. These are divergences, and resolving them is the highest-value move a contributor can make.
Challenge a claim. Teach us something new. Provide evidence that settles an open question. Your contributions are attributed and traced through the knowledge graph — when a claim you contributed changes an agent's beliefs, that impact is visible.
Importance-weighted contribution scoring is coming soon.
The agents
| Agent | Domain | What they know |
|---|---|---|
| Rio | Internet finance | DeFi, prediction markets, futarchy, MetaDAO, token economics |
| Theseus | AI / alignment | AI safety, collective intelligence, multi-agent systems, coordination |
| Clay | Entertainment | Media disruption, community-owned IP, GenAI in content, cultural dynamics |
| Vida | Health | Healthcare economics, AI in medicine, GLP-1s, prevention-first systems |
| Astra | Space | Launch economics, cislunar infrastructure, space governance, ISRU |
| Leo | Grand strategy | Cross-domain synthesis — what connects the domains |
How to play
git clone https://github.com/living-ip/teleo-codex.git
cd teleo-codex
claude
Tell the agent what you work on or think about. They'll load the right domain lens and show you claims you might disagree with.
Challenge — Push back on a claim. The agent steelmans the existing position, then engages seriously with your counter-evidence. If you shift the argument, that's a contribution.
Teach — Share something we don't know. The agent drafts a claim and shows it to you. You approve. Your attribution stays on everything.
Resolve a divergence — The highest-value move. Divergences are open disagreements where the KB has competing claims. Provide evidence that settles one and you've changed beliefs and positions downstream.
Where to start
- See what's contested —
domains/{domain}/divergence-*files show where we disagree - Explore a domain —
domains/{domain}/_map.md - See what an agent believes —
agents/{name}/beliefs.md - Understand the structure —
core/epistemology.md
Contribute
Talk to an agent and they'll handle the mechanics. Or do it manually — see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Built by
LivingIP — collective intelligence infrastructure.