{
  "artifact": "telegram_direct_claim_partial_server_receipt",
  "prompt_id": "DC-01",
  "prompt": "Did we actually update the knowledge base, or is it still just proposals?",
  "target": {
    "platform": "telegram",
    "chat_label": "Leo",
    "chat_id": "-5146042086"
  },
  "server_session": {
    "jsonl_path": "/home/teleo/.hermes/profiles/leoclean/sessions/20260712_183900_2c340f62.jsonl",
    "jsonl_sha256": "764dcf5d893674e363066f3ae2bcd0059783fa80e4801c019949877ac655aa4e",
    "session_timestamp_utc": "2026-07-12T18:39:27.083866",
    "finish_reason": "stop",
    "reply_chars": 1153,
    "reply_sha256": "04376f2469ae8f765aa17535c585bc86585212ab547305f717c1d35807a330ed",
    "tool_sequence": [
      "skill_view:teleo-kb-bridge",
      "teleo-kb status",
      "teleo-kb list-proposals --status all --limit 50"
    ]
  },
  "reply": "Mostly still proposals.\n\nDB readback: claims: `1837`; sources: `4145`; claim_edges: `4916`; claim_evidence: `4670`; kb_proposals: `26`.\n\nBreakdown across all 26 proposals:\n\n- `applied`: 2\n- `approved`: 3 (reviewed, not yet applied)\n- `pending_review`: 14\n- `canceled`: 7\n\nThe 2 applied ones:\n- `f004bbb2` - Leo guiding-policy revision evidence (applied 2026-07-05)\n- `00957f6c` - strict `add_edge` canary (applied 2026-07-09)\n\nThe 3 approved but NOT applied:\n- `14fa5ecc` - claim-split proposal for internet-finance/capital-allocation; `applied_at: none`\n- `ac036c9d` - strategy-kernel document / claim hygiene; `applied_at: none`\n- `a64df080` - Helmer 7 Powers framework packet; `applied_at: none`\n\nApproved is not the same as applied. All three have empty `applied_at` - they are packet-ready but not canonical. The 14 pending proposals haven't been reviewed at all.\n\nNext Cory-style follow-up: the proof-changing action is running the apply step on the 3 approved proposals - that requires explicit operator/admin authorization and a reviewed apply path, not a normal chat command. Want me to draft or refresh the admin review packet for any of them?",
  "post_prompt_readback": {
    "db": {
      "backend": "teleo|postgres",
      "high_signal_rows": {
        "claim_edges": 4916,
        "claim_evidence": 4670,
        "claims": 1837,
        "kb_proposals": 26,
        "sources": 4145
      },
      "proposal_status_counts": {
        "applied": 2,
        "approved": 3,
        "canceled": 7,
        "pending_review": 14
      }
    },
    "service": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "SubState": "running",
      "MainPID": "2403328",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Sun 2026-07-12 09:14:10 UTC"
    },
    "gateway_errors_since_prompt": []
  },
  "telegram_user_prompt_visible": true,
  "telegram_user_prompt_visible_display_time": "20:39",
  "telegram_visible_reply_captured": false,
  "telegram_message_id": "",
  "reply_message_id": "",
  "evidence_tier": "telegram_ingress_plus_live_gateway_session",
  "strict_score": {
    "coverage": "partial",
    "expected_prompt_count": 1,
    "passes": 1,
    "failures": [],
    "pass": true,
    "signals": {
      "canonical_db": true,
      "cory_followup": true,
      "no_overclaim": true,
      "row_level_proof": true,
      "state_semantics": true,
      "structured_db_readback": true
    }
  },
  "mutates_kb": false,
  "production_apply_executed": false,
  "claim_ceiling": "The Telegram user prompt was visibly sent and the live gateway generated this reply after fresh KB readback. The reply itself has not yet been captured in the authenticated Telegram UI, so this is not yet Telegram-visible reply proof."
}
