{
  "before_service": {
    "ActiveState": "active",
    "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 10:40:20 UTC",
    "MainPID": "3520287",
    "NRestarts": "0",
    "SubState": "running"
  },
  "changed_live_profile": false,
  "database_context_all_ok": true,
  "database_context_injection_count": 2,
  "database_context_trace": [
    {
      "contract_ids": [
        "reply_budget",
        "source_intake"
      ],
      "contract_sha256": "9815d85fdd1dc8145d9db79207d7fe37b0df3c81e82b69075f009880d8bf6cd2",
      "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:17.892279+00:00",
      "injected": true,
      "query_sha256": "45141620c3405af992012e2bd5000cabd8a6bffbc784082e856ea1a18b6aec06",
      "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
      "status": "ok"
    },
    {
      "contract_ids": [
        "reply_budget",
        "mixed_packet_composition"
      ],
      "contract_sha256": "f93791c5c0c04895d0bc3080a9eb869d175b61c48e7baa0df19e7ecbddbd7d0a",
      "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:32.752160+00:00",
      "injected": true,
      "query_sha256": "13c255fda3a35cd913ba92960bcda1b4dbcf55a38f3301bdc2a74a8eb040df23",
      "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
      "status": "ok"
    }
  ],
  "db_counts_after": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_before": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_changed": false,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:14.394965+00:00",
  "handler": {
    "authorized": true,
    "session_key": "agent:main:telegram:group:-5146042086:9070919",
    "temp_profile": "/tmp/leo-direct-claim-handler-v9i4nyxp/profile"
  },
  "harness_notes": [
    "Unchanged broad OOS-14 and OOS-06 prompts; current behavior is injected from live teleo-kb operational contracts.",
    "The harness uses a temporary copy of the leoclean profile and does not post to Telegram.",
    "This proves handler-level live VPS GatewayRunner behavior, not human-visible Telegram delivery."
  ],
  "mode": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_m3taversal_targeted_live_database_context",
  "mutates_kb_by_harness": false,
  "pass_runtime": true,
  "posted_to_telegram": false,
  "remote_report_path": "/tmp/leo-m3taversal-oos-targeted-live-db-context-a40b57083d5b.json",
  "remote_returncode": 0,
  "remote_run_id": "a40b57083d5b",
  "results": [
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "database_context_trace": [
        {
          "contract_ids": [
            "reply_budget",
            "source_intake"
          ],
          "contract_sha256": "9815d85fdd1dc8145d9db79207d7fe37b0df3c81e82b69075f009880d8bf6cd2",
          "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:17.892279+00:00",
          "injected": true,
          "query_sha256": "45141620c3405af992012e2bd5000cabd8a6bffbc784082e856ea1a18b6aec06",
          "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ],
      "dimension": "autonomous_source_intake_boundary",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:32.657308+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "I hand Leo a document and say: absorb this as far as safely possible without making me approve every mechanical step. What can Leo capture and stage immediately, what real source identity must be retained, and where does explicit approval begin? Explain only; do not ingest this prompt.",
      "prompt_id": "OOS-14",
      "reply": "What Leo captures immediately, no approval gate:\n\n- Artifact content, a stable storage_path or URL, and a content hash \u2014 those three are the real source identity per the schema (public.sources columns). Chat label, filename, or attachment ref are not source identity and must not be treated as such.\n- Candidate claims extracted into a pending_review proposal packet \u2014 staged, not applied.\n\nWhere approval begins:\n\nAny write to a guarded canonical public.* table (applying a proposal, committing a source row, landing a KB claim) requires explicit authorization. Staging and extraction run free; canonical apply does not.\n\nOne constraint to name plainly:\n\nThe local compiler is proven; live VPS/chat intake is not shipped. Leo cannot invoke the compiler from this chat session. What I can do right now is reason over a document you paste and produce a structured proposal packet in the reply \u2014 you then route that output through the compiler manually. That gap is the honest ceiling on \"absorb without approval.\"\n\nSo the practical boundary is: paste the document, I extract and structure candidates, you get a reviewable packet, you authorize the apply run. Everything upstream of that apply is mechanical and safe; everything at or past it is yours to gate.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:15.113487+00:00",
      "turn": 1
    },
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "database_context_trace": [
        {
          "contract_ids": [
            "reply_budget",
            "mixed_packet_composition"
          ],
          "contract_sha256": "f93791c5c0c04895d0bc3080a9eb869d175b61c48e7baa0df19e7ecbddbd7d0a",
          "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:32.752160+00:00",
          "injected": true,
          "query_sha256": "13c255fda3a35cd913ba92960bcda1b4dbcf55a38f3301bdc2a74a8eb040df23",
          "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ],
      "dimension": "database_composition_judgment",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:49.261157+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Suppose a new research packet contains factual observations, a strategic framework, a disputed interpretation, a governance rule, and a correction to an old belief. How should Leo compose the database so it can reason over the packet later without flattening it all into claims? Give the review and apply sequence too, but do not write anything now.",
      "prompt_id": "OOS-06",
      "reply": "Five elements, five destinations \u2014 nothing flattened:\n\n- Factual observations \u2192 claims rows (type: observation, status: review) backed by a sources row and evidence rows linking evidence to claim. Disputed interpretation \u2192 claims row (status: disputed) plus a claim_edges row pointing from the dispute to the observation it contests \u2014 edges connect claim IDs only, never beliefs or reasoning_tools.\n- Strategic framework \u2192 reasoning_tools row (name, description, category). No scope field exists; scope goes in description.\n- Governance rule and belief correction \u2192 staged but not applied. Both behavioral_rules and beliefs are guards-protected; keep in proposal packet flagged keep_staged until a separate apply capability is authorized.\n\nReview and apply sequence:\n\n1. Reviewer inspects the full packet \u2014 five distinct sections, each mapped to its table, schema guards checked (no falsifier on claims, no status on behavioral_rules, edge endpoints are claim IDs).\n2. On approval: apply in dependency order \u2014 sources first, then claims, then evidence, then claim_edges, then reasoning_tools. That order ensures foreign keys resolve.\n3. Governance rule and belief correction surface as a second review gate, separate PR. Reviewer confirms the belief row to update (by ID) and the exact old text before any write lands.\n\nNothing in the packet shares a row type. Later reasoning can query each layer independently without untangling a flat claim pile.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-13T10:41:32.660716+00:00",
      "turn": 2
    }
  ],
  "service_before_after": {
    "after": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 10:40:20 UTC",
      "MainPID": "3520287",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "before": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 10:40:20 UTC",
      "MainPID": "3520287",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "unchanged_from_preexisting_live_readback": true
  },
  "source": {
    "chat_id": "-5146042086",
    "chat_name": "Leo",
    "chat_type": "group",
    "platform": "telegram",
    "user_id": "9070919",
    "user_name": "codex handler direct claim"
  },
  "source_report_path": "/Users/user/Documents/Codex/2026-07-09/019f34eb-d297-72d0-b7e2-b222d5515ab9-load/work/teleo-infra-main/docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-m3taversal-oos-targeted-post-live-db-context-injection-20260713.json",
  "temp_profile_removed": true
}
