{
  "id": "rio_meteora_lp_incentives",
  "lane": "rio-economics",
  "description": "Rio should own Meteora LP, paid-query, x402, futarchy, and contribution-incentive reasoning.",
  "input": {
    "branch": "rio/meteora-lp-incentives",
    "title": "Meteora LP agent capital allocation rules",
    "body": "Proposal asks whether a Living IP agent should route liquidity through Meteora while using paid queries and futarchy signals to allocate contributor rewards.",
    "diff": "diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/meteora-lp-agent.md b/domains/internet-finance/meteora-lp-agent.md\n+Meteora LP agent capital allocation depends on x402 paid queries, decision markets, futarchy votes, and contribution weights.\n+The evaluator must check whether payment creates garbage incentives or useful knowledge."
  },
  "rubric": {
    "must_check": [
      "paid-query effects",
      "liquidity pool risk",
      "contribution-weight incentives",
      "source-diversity and correlated-prior risk"
    ],
    "reject_if": [
      "treats payment as quality approval",
      "ignores LP loss or protocol risk",
      "omits OPSEC review for capital allocation"
    ]
  },
  "expected": {
    "primary_agent": "Rio",
    "required_agents": [
      "Rio"
    ],
    "route_kind": "single",
    "expected_disposition": "escalate",
    "issue_tags": [
      "capital_allocation",
      "incentive_design",
      "paid_query_effects"
    ]
  }
}
