{
  "before_service": {
    "ActiveState": "active",
    "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 11:00:09 UTC",
    "MainPID": "3643400",
    "NRestarts": "0",
    "SubState": "running"
  },
  "changed_live_profile": false,
  "database_context_all_ok": true,
  "database_context_injection_count": 1,
  "database_context_trace": [
    {
      "contract_ids": [
        "reply_budget",
        "mixed_packet_composition"
      ],
      "contract_sha256": "e93a0c035e7d4084a197d71f11bf293c695024b05944cae01d58a57eb0d595bf",
      "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T11:01:17.101126+00:00",
      "injected": true,
      "query_sha256": "13c255fda3a35cd913ba92960bcda1b4dbcf55a38f3301bdc2a74a8eb040df23",
      "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
      "status": "ok"
    }
  ],
  "db_counts_after": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_before": {
    "kb_stage.kb_proposals": 26,
    "public.claim_edges": 4916,
    "public.claim_evidence": 4670,
    "public.claims": 1837,
    "public.sources": 4145
  },
  "db_counts_changed": false,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T11:01:14.011205+00:00",
  "handler": {
    "authorized": true,
    "session_key": "agent:main:telegram:group:-5146042086:9070919",
    "temp_profile": "/tmp/leo-direct-claim-handler-nqtplnkt/profile"
  },
  "harness_notes": [
    "Unchanged OOS-06 prompt after live table semantics and compact reply contract.",
    "The harness uses a temporary copy of the leoclean profile and does not post to Telegram.",
    "This proves handler-level live VPS GatewayRunner behavior, not human-visible Telegram delivery."
  ],
  "mode": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_oos06_post_budget",
  "mutates_kb_by_harness": false,
  "pass_runtime": true,
  "posted_to_telegram": false,
  "remote_report_path": "/tmp/leo-oos06-post-budget-294b5bc74e32.json",
  "remote_returncode": 0,
  "remote_run_id": "294b5bc74e32",
  "results": [
    {
      "claim_ceiling": "Live VPS GatewayRunner reply from temp leoclean profile; no Telegram post; no production DB apply authorized.",
      "database_context_trace": [
        {
          "contract_ids": [
            "reply_budget",
            "mixed_packet_composition"
          ],
          "contract_sha256": "e93a0c035e7d4084a197d71f11bf293c695024b05944cae01d58a57eb0d595bf",
          "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-13T11:01:17.101126+00:00",
          "injected": true,
          "query_sha256": "13c255fda3a35cd913ba92960bcda1b4dbcf55a38f3301bdc2a74a8eb040df23",
          "source": "kb_tool.py --local context",
          "status": "ok"
        }
      ],
      "dimension": "database_composition_judgment",
      "ended_at_utc": "2026-07-13T11:01:30.146238+00:00",
      "evidence_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile",
      "mutates_kb": false,
      "ok": true,
      "prompt": "Suppose a new research packet contains factual observations, a strategic framework, a disputed interpretation, a governance rule, and a correction to an old belief. How should Leo compose the database so it can reason over the packet later without flattening it all into claims? Give the review and apply sequence too, but do not write anything now.",
      "prompt_id": "OOS-06",
      "reply": "Mapping across the five elements:\n\n- Factual observations \u2192 claims (type: empirical, sources + evidence rows attached). Strategic framework \u2192 reasoning_tools (name, description, category; no scope field; no claim-edge pointing at it). Disputed interpretation \u2192 claims (type: empirical or structural, lower confidence, dispute surfaced via claim_edges between the competing claim rows). Governance rule \u2192 behavioral_rules if it is an operating rule (rule, rationale, category, rank, agent_id); only promote to governance_gates if it carries explicit evaluation criteria, an evidence bar, and a pass_condition. Correction to an old belief \u2192 beliefs row update (status: revised, new statement + confidence + falsifier; the old row's status moves to revised, not deleted).\n\n- Review/apply sequence: stage the full packet as a typed pending_review proposal without touching canonical tables; reviewer checks type assignments, evidence attachments, edge endpoints (claims only, never reasoning_tool or belief IDs), and exact row values; apply only the supported collections (claims, sources, evidence, edges, reasoning_tools, belief updates) after explicit authorization; keep behavioral_rules and governance_gates staged \u2014 approve_claim does not cover them, separate capability required; record applied_at on the proposal receipt plus created/updated row IDs and run a postflight readback.\n\n- Hard boundary: behavioral_rules and governance_gates cannot be applied in the same pass as claims even if the authorization is broad \u2014 they remain staged until a reviewed apply path for those tables exists.",
      "started_at_utc": "2026-07-13T11:01:14.476172+00:00",
      "turn": 1
    }
  ],
  "service_before_after": {
    "after": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 11:00:09 UTC",
      "MainPID": "3643400",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "before": {
      "ActiveState": "active",
      "ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Mon 2026-07-13 11:00:09 UTC",
      "MainPID": "3643400",
      "NRestarts": "0",
      "SubState": "running"
    },
    "unchanged_from_preexisting_live_readback": true
  },
  "source": {
    "chat_id": "-5146042086",
    "chat_name": "Leo",
    "chat_type": "group",
    "platform": "telegram",
    "user_id": "9070919",
    "user_name": "codex handler direct claim"
  },
  "source_report_path": "docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/telegram-handler-m3taversal-oos-oos06-post-budget-20260713.json",
  "temp_profile_removed": true
}
