# Post-Intake-Repair Targeted Handler Check

## Result

After PR #109 deployed at merge `0182f71f1c181f079080b2621016e6bf27c1e655`,
the same five high-risk prompts ran through the live VPS GatewayRunner with a
temporary leoclean profile.

- Strict result after semantic calibration: `2/5`.
- Passed: proposal readiness (`OOS-04`) and restart/persistence reasoning
  (`OOS-10`).
- Shared-claim versus belief storage (`OOS-11`) was semantically correct but
  failed the reply budget at `250` words.
- Source intake (`OOS-14`) correctly preserved current source fields and review
  boundaries, but omitted that the compiler is build-only/not live and used
  `226` words.
- Mixed-packet composition (`OOS-06`) correctly isolated unsupported policy and
  belief writes, but flattened the reusable framework into a claim graph,
  omitted the current governance-gate distinction, and used `277` words.

## Safety Readback

- Canonical counts stayed `1837/4145/4670/4916/26`.
- `leoclean-gateway.service` stayed active/running on PID `3166667` with zero
  restarts and the same start timestamp.
- The temporary profile was removed.
- No Telegram message or production DB apply ran.

The next repair sets a `170`-word drafting target under the `220`-word hard cap,
requires current intake answers to lead with the non-live compiler ceiling, and
adds a compact current-schema mixed-packet map.
