teleo/teleo-infrastructure
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

Record live Leo database reasoning proof

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
twentyOne2x 2026-07-14 10:12:16 +02:00
parent 9d4baafc69
commit 56a99743fc
5 changed files with 656 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
.github/workflows/ci.yml vendored
View file

@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ jobs:
scripts/run_gcp_generated_db_direct_claim_suite.py \
scripts/run_leo_direct_claim_handler_suite.py \
scripts/run_leo_m3taversal_oos_handler_suite.py \
scripts/verify_leo_db_first_oos_canary.py \
scripts/run_leo_clone_bound_handler_checkpoint.py \
scripts/working_leo_m3taversal_oos_benchmark.py \
scripts/working_leo_open_ended_benchmark.py \
@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ jobs:
tests/test_hermes_leoclean_skill_surfaces.py \
tests/test_leo_behavior_manifest.py \
tests/test_leo_tool_trace.py \
tests/test_verify_leo_db_first_oos_canary.py \
tests/test_compile_kb_source_packet.py \
tests/test_verify_postgres_parity_manifest.py \
tests/test_working_leo_m3taversal_oos_benchmark.py \

230
docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/db-first-oos-tool-attributed-canary-20260714.json Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
{
"checks": {
"all_three_database_tools_completed": true,
"candidate_claims_proposed": true,
"canonical_counts_unchanged": true,
"claim_and_sources_returned": true,
"claim_support_challenged": true,
"database_tool_call_proven": true,
"database_tools_read_only": true,
"delivered_reply_within_budget": true,
"deploy_head_matches_stamp": true,
"exact_blind_prompt": true,
"gateway_process_unchanged": true,
"handler_completed": true,
"harness_did_not_mutate_kb": true,
"live_behavior_profile_unchanged": true,
"not_posted_to_telegram": true,
"one_nonempty_reply": true,
"retrieval_receipt_proven": true,
"shallow_claim_decomposed": true,
"temporary_profile_removed": true,
"user_iteration_requested_before_live": true
},
"claim_ceiling": {
"not_proven": [
"Telegram-visible user-message delivery",
"canonical proposal apply",
"database-to-identity or SOUL recomposition",
"GCP runtime or database parity with this VPS state"
],
"proven": "A fresh-session live VPS handler turn found an unfamiliar claim without a supplied ID, completed read-only search/show/evidence calls against the canonical KB, challenged weak support, proposed candidate replacements, and preserved the review-before-live boundary."
},
"database_tool_proof": {
"claim_id": "2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7",
"source_ids": [
"15740795-ecc6-40fa-9a01-3d6bc7c54f79",
"261c3532-fa32-47d8-a5b5-6cc45035c267"
],
"subcommands": [
"evidence",
"search",
"show"
],
"trace": {
"access_modes": [
"read_only"
],
"calls": [
{
"arguments_sha256": "a77c416f5bf6951d84becf9e613bd601f6c1d89835f7e14712ba85810aef7f02",
"call_index": 0,
"database_invocations": [
{
"access_mode": "read_only",
"command_sha256": "71552fd6b8541746f160435d460ae29647d04d6b5d2a645c176fa7745e9412de",
"executable": "teleo-kb",
"subcommand": "search"
}
],
"message_index": 3,
"result": {
"content_bytes": 7566,
"content_sha256": "6013ce8d53a50155e5c7ecd2aee86b3a7e290b2b22bb149e92da08c801522a25",
"error_detected": false,
"nonempty": true,
"retrieval_receipt": {
"artifact_state_sha256": "190f16754f4c3655b9464cd567d7b7769f030be9ecd71bbffa9caaa16e790639",
"read_consistency_status": "stable_wal_marker",
"schema": "livingip.teleoKbRetrievalReceipt.v1",
"semantic_context_sha256": "45e7b69d84f9fe5177cf99609df77d57be4306ed5dba6e7f60d33f12175276c6"
},
"row_id_count": 14,
"row_ids": [
"15740795-ecc6-40fa-9a01-3d6bc7c54f79",
"23781b61-930f-4e89-b879-754a91b44072",
"24a25577-c957-4c9a-a429-6995f4ae95d9",
"261c3532-fa32-47d8-a5b5-6cc45035c267",
"2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7",
"543c4e0b-0e62-42a4-a1c1-296a54127e6b",
"84f13d26-2669-44ef-b577-c3f14d52c16f",
"8520ad6b-9b57-458e-9a3b-38206130006b",
"932323fc-1438-4809-96ff-1afc504837f7",
"962dbae6-2616-4185-96d3-d42a04abcdad",
"99cca3d1-41c8-40cd-b41a-70634056af70",
"a028143f-e343-4460-94d9-d447703f1837",
"a45dc668-ee73-460f-9680-5f3726f595c4",
"d285abaf-e3bb-41e5-a85d-2d35c9ace143"
],
"sha256_value_count": 2,
"sha256_values": [
"190f16754f4c3655b9464cd567d7b7769f030be9ecd71bbffa9caaa16e790639",
"45e7b69d84f9fe5177cf99609df77d57be4306ed5dba6e7f60d33f12175276c6"
]
},
"tool_call_id_sha256": "bf4250b3f841948974c978980da0050e565cc6892f7a233dbd5dbff87850dbbd",
"tool_name": "terminal"
},
{
"arguments_sha256": "519e258beeb1c2fc06280f6edf3c9513528760399054287e54a44799d161cbe2",
"call_index": 0,
"database_invocations": [
{
"access_mode": "read_only",
"command_sha256": "02325a4373e4bef6243cf8146b74233ce0927cf6965985468213e190a1bfd9d1",
"executable": "teleo-kb",
"subcommand": "show"
}
],
"message_index": 5,
"result": {
"content_bytes": 1735,
"content_sha256": "a2bd6f8e7863d4b1efb3d88050d2133fdd1aaae78159787d1bbe403b5dd4d2d4",
"error_detected": false,
"nonempty": true,
"retrieval_receipt": null,
"row_id_count": 4,
"row_ids": [
"15740795-ecc6-40fa-9a01-3d6bc7c54f79",
"23781b61-930f-4e89-b879-754a91b44072",
"261c3532-fa32-47d8-a5b5-6cc45035c267",
"2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7"
],
"sha256_value_count": 0,
"sha256_values": []
},
"tool_call_id_sha256": "f37a43e5493ef56988c08c40eaa55c364e42890507355855a4ce4e0786b71c37",
"tool_name": "terminal"
},
{
"arguments_sha256": "d2aa0e4db52003664c2d607ac676835e72a98f42a6e33a59a25631182c3912b6",
"call_index": 0,
"database_invocations": [
{
"access_mode": "read_only",
"command_sha256": "d8ba6033d5947f5e271758b8f4b078720934d0af96b616be9156244128775941",
"executable": "teleo-kb",
"subcommand": "evidence"
}
],
"message_index": 7,
"result": {
"content_bytes": 3153,
"content_sha256": "2b4ad202ed0557ec46c2ce58cbe122d515cdd1419bf89a9077645d79a37f242b",
"error_detected": false,
"nonempty": true,
"retrieval_receipt": null,
"row_id_count": 3,
"row_ids": [
"15740795-ecc6-40fa-9a01-3d6bc7c54f79",
"261c3532-fa32-47d8-a5b5-6cc45035c267",
"2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7"
],
"sha256_value_count": 2,
"sha256_values": [
"341a7685cd2909ae821d8e464fe0d4fdfbb0cadccf546ccfd4ccaf037aa9f646",
"9fcd40191449fe0843178e08120fb3c86fc2b35633594aee60e747ca3918cfa5"
]
},
"tool_call_id_sha256": "fccfd109dfde38aa376a0b9d6b700f5b8a16876eacf016191d44a7c6999c5e77",
"tool_name": "terminal"
}
],
"database_retrieval_receipt_proven": true,
"database_tool_call_count": 3,
"database_tool_call_proven": true,
"database_tool_calls_read_only": true,
"database_tool_completed_count": 3,
"raw_arguments_retained": false,
"raw_commands_retained": false,
"raw_results_retained": false,
"schema": "livingip.leoKbToolTrace.v1"
}
},
"deployment": {
"deploy_head": "23bd2a8d23b56cc6eb9ea4ca12033dc648068ce0",
"deploy_stamp": "23bd2a8d23b56cc6eb9ea4ca12033dc648068ce0",
"head_matches_stamp": true
},
"generated_at_utc": "2026-07-14T08:05:27.140051+00:00",
"outcomes": {
"did_not_change_canonical_knowledge": true,
"did_not_turn_the_test_conversation_into_hidden_training": true,
"found_the_relevant_claim_without_a_supplied_id": true,
"inspected_the_claim_and_its_actual_support": true,
"kept_the_user_in_the_loop_before_any_live_change": true,
"proposed_better_candidate_claims": true,
"recognized_that_the_claim_was_shallow": true
},
"prompt": "Our claim that AI sandbagging creates M&A liability feels shallow. Without me giving you a claim ID, inspect the live claim and what actually supports it. Tell me what is weak, what new claim or claims you would propose, and how you would iterate with me before anything becomes live. Do not change the database.",
"proof_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_no_telegram_post_no_apply",
"reply": "What's weak:\n\n- The primary `grounds` evidence (Harvard JOLT Digest) has `no_source_pointer` - no URL, no storage path, no hash. It is a label, not traceable canonical evidence. The only verified artifact is the internal synthesis doc playing `illustrates`, not `grounds`. The claim effectively rests on an unresolvable citation.\n\n- The claim bundles three distinct legal theories (product liability, consumer protection, securities fraud) plus a normative governance conclusion into one structural claim. None of the three theories are independently grounded. Confidence sits at 0.55 for a reason, but the fix isn't higher confidence \u2014 it's decomposition.\n\n- The \"market-driven governance mechanism\" half of the claim is normative and would need its own evidence chain; bundled into a structural claim it borrows credibility it hasn't earned.\n\nProposed iteration, no writes yet:\n\n1. Split into three narrower empirical claims \u2014 one per legal theory \u2014 each requiring a primary-source grounding row with a resolvable locator.\n2. Separate normative claim for the market-driven governance conclusion, grounded in deal-structure evidence or regulatory precedent.\n3. Retire the current bundled claim via `supersedes` edge once all three narrower claims plus the normative one are reviewed and applied.\n\nHow I'd iterate with you:\n\nYou bring the JOLT source (URL or file). I run `prepare-source` on it, read the receipt, and draft three candidate claims plus one normative one as a proposal packet.",
"reply_contract_word_count": 219,
"reply_sha256": "28f771e3d3417fb8db35029a4136b2d9f8c2f22aa87864de33849bd23d5e58f1",
"schema": "livingip.leoDbFirstOosCanaryReceipt.v1",
"source_report_sha256": "f1c4424154d8ac14e162ca4f6cf6f7889b0f226411fea12162a5c83c4d1f5275",
"state_readback": {
"behavior_sha256_after": "fc5faa0414a452815f15225752fe95a38cd51f66ff047199b3e823be744c398a",
"behavior_sha256_before": "fc5faa0414a452815f15225752fe95a38cd51f66ff047199b3e823be744c398a",
"database_counts_after": {
"kb_stage.kb_proposals": 29,
"public.claim_edges": 4916,
"public.claim_evidence": 4670,
"public.claims": 1837,
"public.sources": 4145
},
"database_counts_before": {
"kb_stage.kb_proposals": 29,
"public.claim_edges": 4916,
"public.claim_evidence": 4670,
"public.claims": 1837,
"public.sources": 4145
},
"service_after": {
"ActiveState": "active",
"ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Tue 2026-07-14 07:49:45 UTC",
"MainPID": "3123746",
"NRestarts": "0",
"SubState": "running"
},
"service_before": {
"ActiveState": "active",
"ExecMainStartTimestamp": "Tue 2026-07-14 07:49:45 UTC",
"MainPID": "3123746",
"NRestarts": "0",
"SubState": "running"
},
"temporary_profile_removed": true
},
"status": "pass"
}

48
docs/reports/leo-working-state-20260709/working-leo-db-first-behavior-model-20260714.md
View file

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Fresh readback on `2026-07-14` found the VPS service active with `NRestarts=0` a
| `SOUL.md` | Primary runtime identity text loaded into the system prompt | Static until manually edited or rendered | Fully hashable; current SHA-256 `5973a54c...32a` | Important runtime input, but not canonical truth. No active general DB-to-SOUL renderer is proven. |
| Skills | Procedural instructions discoverable by Hermes | Deployment-static | Source-controlled and hashable | Useful for tool use, but detailed answer rules can become hidden prompt training. |
| `leo-db-context` plugin | Injects pre-turn DB contracts, validates drafts, and can replace the final answer | Request-dynamic over static code | Source-controlled but invisible in normal chat | The most behaviorally powerful and obscure layer. Current query-specific compiled answers are a temporary guardrail, not database reasoning. |
| KB bridge/tool code | Queries claims/context/evidence/edges and stages proposals | Deployment-static code over dynamic DB | Source-controlled; calls can emit receipts | Correct architectural control point. This branch adds allowlisted artifact resolution, hash verification, and deterministic context receipts on VPS. |
| KB bridge/tool code | Queries claims/context/evidence/edges and stages proposals | Deployment-static code over dynamic DB | Source-controlled; calls can emit receipts | Correct architectural control point. The current VPS deployment has allowlisted artifact resolution, hash verification, deterministic context receipts, and secret-safe tool-call attribution. |
| Canonical Postgres | Stores applied claims, sources, evidence, graph, and identity/strategy rows | Governed dynamic | Row IDs, hashes, manifests, and apply receipts | Intended source of durable knowledge. |
| `kb_stage` proposals | Holds candidates awaiting review/apply | Dynamic, review-gated | Queryable and replayable | Correct place for discussion-derived candidates before approval. |
| `MEMORY.md` / `USER.md` | Persistent Hermes facts/preferences injected outside Postgres | Conversation-dynamic | File-hashable but provenance-poor | Noncanonical. Live `USER.md` contains a stale naming rule that conflicts with the exact visible-handle rule. |
@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ The harness must:
## Delivery Status And Repair Order
1. **Implemented in this branch - remove causal ambiguity from tests:** exclude prior memories/sessions from temporary profiles and fingerprint every behavior-bearing layer.
2. **Implemented and live-canary proven on VPS - complete retrieval receipts:** resolve source paths, verify content hashes, stabilize row ordering, and hash the exact context bundle.
1. **Merged and deployed - remove causal ambiguity from tests:** exclude prior memories/sessions from temporary profiles, fingerprint every behavior-bearing layer, and retain a secret-safe receipt for completed KB tool calls.
2. **Merged, deployed, and live-canary proven on VPS - complete retrieval receipts:** resolve source paths, verify content hashes, stabilize row ordering, and hash the exact context bundle.
3. **Bounded compiler behavior proven locally - make discussion ingestion real:** stable message-level locators can produce pending-review proposals without profile edits, but automatic Telegram capture is not shipped.
4. **Remaining - reduce query-specific middleware:** keep generic truth and authorization guards, then measure raw DB reasoning separately from compiled response replacement.
5. **Remaining - make identity composition deterministic:** implement and receipt a DB-to-`SOUL.md` renderer before calling identity updates live.
@ -149,3 +149,45 @@ The machine-readable receipt is
[`db-first-source-verification-canary-20260714.json`](./db-first-source-verification-canary-20260714.json).
This proves deterministic read and artifact verification on VPS. It does not
yet prove a Telegram-visible answer, GCP parity, or an approved canonical write.
## Live VPS Causal Reasoning Canary
The exact blind challenge below was repeated after VPS deploy head and deploy
stamp both reached merge commit `23bd2a8d23b56cc6eb9ea4ca12033dc648068ce0`:
> Our claim that AI sandbagging creates M&A liability feels shallow. Without me
> giving you a claim ID, inspect the live claim and what actually supports it.
> Tell me what is weak, what new claim or claims you would propose, and how you
> would iterate with me before anything becomes live. Do not change the database.
The temporary profile contained the deployed static behavior surfaces but no
live memories, sessions, state database, or generated prompt cache. The full raw
tool transcript remained inside that disposable profile and was deleted. The
retained receipt contains only hashes, recognized KB subcommands, access modes,
row IDs, and retrieval-receipt fields.
What was proved:
- Leo completed `teleo-kb search`, `show`, and `evidence` calls. All three were
read-only and returned nonempty results without a detected error.
- The retrieval returned claim `2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7` and the
two relevant source rows without an ID in the prompt. The search receipt had
a stable WAL marker, semantic hash `45e7b69d...276c6`, and artifact-state hash
`190f1675...0639`.
- The delivered answer distinguished the untraceable `grounds` citation from
the verified artifact that only `illustrates` the claim. It identified the
bundled legal theories as shallow, proposed narrower empirical claims plus a
separate normative claim, and asked for the original URL or file before
preparing a proposal packet.
- The deterministic verifier passed all 20 mechanics/safety checks and all 7
user-outcome checks. The delivered response was 219 contract-counted words.
- Before/after counts were identical: 1,837 claims, 4,145 sources, 4,670
evidence links, 4,916 claim edges, and 29 proposals. The behavior fingerprint,
gateway PID, start time, and zero-restart count were also unchanged, and the
temporary profile was removed.
The machine receipt is
[`db-first-oos-tool-attributed-canary-20260714.json`](./db-first-oos-tool-attributed-canary-20260714.json).
This is causal handler-level proof that the answer used live KB retrieval. It
is not Telegram-visible proof, a canonical apply, DB-to-identity composition,
or GCP parity with this current VPS state.

240
scripts/verify_leo_db_first_oos_canary.py Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Verify and condense one live VPS database-first out-of-sample canary."""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import hashlib
import json
import re
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
SCHEMA = "livingip.leoDbFirstOosCanaryReceipt.v1"
EXPECTED_PROMPT = (
"Our claim that AI sandbagging creates M&A liability feels shallow. "
"Without me giving you a claim ID, inspect the live claim and what actually supports it. "
"Tell me what is weak, what new claim or claims you would propose, and how you would iterate "
"with me before anything becomes live. Do not change the database."
)
EXPECTED_CLAIM_ID = "2a7ae257-d01d-46f4-b813-63f81bb9c7c7"
EXPECTED_SOURCE_IDS = frozenset(
{
"15740795-ecc6-40fa-9a01-3d6bc7c54f79",
"261c3532-fa32-47d8-a5b5-6cc45035c267",
}
)
EXPECTED_SUBCOMMANDS = frozenset({"search", "show", "evidence"})
SHA_RE = re.compile(r"^[0-9a-f]{40}$")
UUID_RE = re.compile(
r"\b[0-9a-fA-F]{8}-[0-9a-fA-F]{4}-[1-5][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[89abAB][0-9a-fA-F]{3}-[0-9a-fA-F]{12}\b"
)
WORD_RE = re.compile(r"\b\w+(?:[-']\w+)*\b")
def _sha256_file(path: Path) -> str:
digest = hashlib.sha256()
with path.open("rb") as handle:
for chunk in iter(lambda: handle.read(1024 * 1024), b""):
digest.update(chunk)
return digest.hexdigest()
def _contains_all(value: str, terms: tuple[str, ...]) -> bool:
lowered = value.lower()
return all(term.lower() in lowered for term in terms)
def _tool_facts(trace: dict[str, Any]) -> tuple[set[str], set[str], bool]:
subcommands: set[str] = set()
row_ids: set[str] = set()
completed_without_error = True
for call in trace.get("calls") or []:
for invocation in call.get("database_invocations") or []:
subcommand = str(invocation.get("subcommand") or "")
if subcommand:
subcommands.add(subcommand)
result = call.get("result") or {}
row_ids.update(str(value) for value in result.get("row_ids") or [])
completed_without_error = completed_without_error and bool(
result.get("nonempty") is True and result.get("error_detected") is False
)
return subcommands, row_ids, completed_without_error
def verify_report(
report: dict[str, Any],
*,
deploy_head: str,
deploy_stamp: str,
source_report_sha256: str,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
results = report.get("results") or []
result = results[0] if len(results) == 1 and isinstance(results[0], dict) else {}
prompt = str(result.get("prompt") or "")
reply = str(result.get("reply") or "")
trace = result.get("database_tool_trace") or {}
subcommands, row_ids, completed_without_error = _tool_facts(trace)
context_records = result.get("database_context_trace") or []
post_record = next(
(record for record in reversed(context_records) if record.get("event") == "post_llm_call"),
{},
)
service = report.get("service_before_after") or {}
service_before = service.get("before") or {}
service_after = service.get("after") or {}
behavior_before = (report.get("live_behavior_manifest_before") or {}).get("behavior_sha256")
behavior_after = (report.get("live_behavior_manifest_after") or {}).get("behavior_sha256")
word_count = len(WORD_RE.findall(reply))
checks = {
"exact_blind_prompt": prompt == EXPECTED_PROMPT and not UUID_RE.search(prompt),
"one_nonempty_reply": len(results) == 1 and bool(reply.strip()),
"handler_completed": report.get("pass_runtime") is True,
"not_posted_to_telegram": report.get("posted_to_telegram") is False,
"harness_did_not_mutate_kb": report.get("mutates_kb_by_harness") is False,
"database_tool_call_proven": trace.get("database_tool_call_proven") is True,
"all_three_database_tools_completed": (
trace.get("database_tool_completed_count") == 3
and subcommands >= EXPECTED_SUBCOMMANDS
and completed_without_error
),
"database_tools_read_only": (
trace.get("database_tool_calls_read_only") is True
and trace.get("access_modes") == ["read_only"]
),
"retrieval_receipt_proven": trace.get("database_retrieval_receipt_proven") is True,
"claim_and_sources_returned": (
EXPECTED_CLAIM_ID in row_ids and row_ids >= EXPECTED_SOURCE_IDS
),
"claim_support_challenged": _contains_all(
reply,
("no_source_pointer", "grounds", "verified artifact", "illustrates"),
),
"shallow_claim_decomposed": (
_contains_all(reply, ("product liability", "consumer protection", "securities fraud"))
and any(term in reply.lower() for term in ("split", "decompos"))
),
"candidate_claims_proposed": _contains_all(
reply,
("empirical claims", "normative claim", "proposal packet"),
),
"user_iteration_requested_before_live": (
_contains_all(reply, ("url or file", "prepare-source"))
and any(term in reply.lower() for term in ("no writes yet", "before anything becomes live"))
),
"delivered_reply_within_budget": (
word_count <= 220
and report.get("database_response_validation_all_ok") is True
and post_record.get("delivered_issues") == []
and post_record.get("validated") is True
),
"canonical_counts_unchanged": (
report.get("db_counts_changed") is False
and report.get("db_counts_before") == report.get("db_counts_after")
),
"live_behavior_profile_unchanged": (
report.get("changed_live_profile") is False
and report.get("live_behavior_manifest_unchanged") is True
and bool(behavior_before)
and behavior_before == behavior_after
),
"gateway_process_unchanged": (
service.get("unchanged_from_preexisting_live_readback") is True
and service_before == service_after
and service_after.get("ActiveState") == "active"
and service_after.get("SubState") == "running"
and service_after.get("NRestarts") == "0"
),
"temporary_profile_removed": report.get("temp_profile_removed") is True,
"deploy_head_matches_stamp": (
bool(SHA_RE.fullmatch(deploy_head))
and deploy_head == deploy_stamp
),
}
outcomes = {
"found_the_relevant_claim_without_a_supplied_id": (
checks["exact_blind_prompt"] and checks["claim_and_sources_returned"]
),
"inspected_the_claim_and_its_actual_support": (
checks["all_three_database_tools_completed"] and checks["claim_support_challenged"]
),
"recognized_that_the_claim_was_shallow": checks["shallow_claim_decomposed"],
"proposed_better_candidate_claims": checks["candidate_claims_proposed"],
"kept_the_user_in_the_loop_before_any_live_change": checks["user_iteration_requested_before_live"],
"did_not_turn_the_test_conversation_into_hidden_training": (
checks["live_behavior_profile_unchanged"] and checks["temporary_profile_removed"]
),
"did_not_change_canonical_knowledge": checks["canonical_counts_unchanged"],
}
passed = all(checks.values()) and all(outcomes.values())
return {
"schema": SCHEMA,
"status": "pass" if passed else "fail",
"generated_at_utc": report.get("generated_at_utc"),
"proof_tier": "live_vps_gatewayrunner_temp_profile_no_telegram_post_no_apply",
"deployment": {
"deploy_head": deploy_head,
"deploy_stamp": deploy_stamp,
"head_matches_stamp": deploy_head == deploy_stamp,
},
"source_report_sha256": source_report_sha256,
"prompt": prompt,
"reply": reply,
"reply_sha256": hashlib.sha256(reply.encode("utf-8")).hexdigest(),
"reply_contract_word_count": word_count,
"checks": checks,
"outcomes": outcomes,
"database_tool_proof": {
"subcommands": sorted(subcommands),
"claim_id": EXPECTED_CLAIM_ID,
"source_ids": sorted(EXPECTED_SOURCE_IDS),
"trace": trace,
},
"state_readback": {
"database_counts_before": report.get("db_counts_before"),
"database_counts_after": report.get("db_counts_after"),
"behavior_sha256_before": behavior_before,
"behavior_sha256_after": behavior_after,
"service_before": service_before,
"service_after": service_after,
"temporary_profile_removed": report.get("temp_profile_removed"),
},
"claim_ceiling": {
"proven": (
"A fresh-session live VPS handler turn found an unfamiliar claim without a supplied ID, completed "
"read-only search/show/evidence calls against the canonical KB, challenged weak support, proposed "
"candidate replacements, and preserved the review-before-live boundary."
),
"not_proven": [
"Telegram-visible user-message delivery",
"canonical proposal apply",
"database-to-identity or SOUL recomposition",
"GCP runtime or database parity with this VPS state",
],
},
}
def main() -> int:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
parser.add_argument("--report", type=Path, required=True)
parser.add_argument("--deploy-head", required=True)
parser.add_argument("--deploy-stamp", required=True)
parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, required=True)
args = parser.parse_args()
report = json.loads(args.report.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
receipt = verify_report(
report,
deploy_head=args.deploy_head,
deploy_stamp=args.deploy_stamp,
source_report_sha256=_sha256_file(args.report),
)
args.output.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
args.output.write_text(json.dumps(receipt, indent=2, sort_keys=True) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
print(json.dumps({"output": str(args.output), "status": receipt["status"]}, sort_keys=True))
return 0 if receipt["status"] == "pass" else 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(main())

139
tests/test_verify_leo_db_first_oos_canary.py Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
"""Tests for the live VPS database-first canary verifier."""
from __future__ import annotations
import copy
import sys
from pathlib import Path
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "scripts"))
import verify_leo_db_first_oos_canary as verifier # noqa: E402
def passing_report() -> dict:
claim_id = verifier.EXPECTED_CLAIM_ID
source_ids = sorted(verifier.EXPECTED_SOURCE_IDS)
reply = (
"No writes yet. The grounds row has no_source_pointer. The verified artifact only illustrates the claim. "
"The claim bundles product liability, consumer protection, and securities fraud, so split it into narrower "
"empirical claims. Add a separate normative claim and keep it in a proposal packet. You bring the URL or "
"file; I run prepare-source before anything becomes live."
)
trace = {
"database_tool_call_proven": True,
"database_retrieval_receipt_proven": True,
"database_tool_calls_read_only": True,
"database_tool_completed_count": 3,
"access_modes": ["read_only"],
"calls": [
{
"database_invocations": [{"subcommand": subcommand, "access_mode": "read_only"}],
"result": {
"nonempty": True,
"error_detected": False,
"row_ids": [claim_id, *source_ids],
},
}
for subcommand in sorted(verifier.EXPECTED_SUBCOMMANDS)
],
}
service = {
"ActiveState": "active",
"SubState": "running",
"MainPID": "123",
"NRestarts": "0",
}
counts = {"public.claims": 1, "public.sources": 2}
behavior = {"behavior_sha256": "b" * 64}
return {
"generated_at_utc": "2026-07-14T08:05:27+00:00",
"posted_to_telegram": False,
"mutates_kb_by_harness": False,
"pass_runtime": True,
"db_counts_changed": False,
"db_counts_before": counts,
"db_counts_after": counts,
"changed_live_profile": False,
"live_behavior_manifest_unchanged": True,
"live_behavior_manifest_before": behavior,
"live_behavior_manifest_after": behavior,
"database_response_validation_all_ok": True,
"temp_profile_removed": True,
"service_before_after": {
"before": service,
"after": service,
"unchanged_from_preexisting_live_readback": True,
},
"results": [
{
"prompt": verifier.EXPECTED_PROMPT,
"reply": reply,
"database_tool_trace": trace,
"database_context_trace": [
{
"event": "post_llm_call",
"delivered_issues": [],
"validated": True,
}
],
}
],
}
def verify(report: dict) -> dict:
sha = "a" * 40
return verifier.verify_report(
report,
deploy_head=sha,
deploy_stamp=sha,
source_report_sha256="f" * 64,
)
def test_passing_report_proves_each_user_outcome() -> None:
receipt = verify(passing_report())
assert receipt["status"] == "pass"
assert all(receipt["checks"].values())
assert all(receipt["outcomes"].values())
assert receipt["database_tool_proof"]["subcommands"] == ["evidence", "search", "show"]
def test_missing_tool_result_fails_attribution_and_claim_inspection() -> None:
report = passing_report()
report["results"][0]["database_tool_trace"]["calls"][0]["result"] = None
receipt = verify(report)
assert receipt["status"] == "fail"
assert receipt["checks"]["all_three_database_tools_completed"] is False
assert receipt["outcomes"]["inspected_the_claim_and_its_actual_support"] is False
def test_database_or_profile_mutation_fails_safety_outcomes() -> None:
report = passing_report()
report["db_counts_after"] = {"public.claims": 2, "public.sources": 2}
report["db_counts_changed"] = True
report["live_behavior_manifest_after"] = {"behavior_sha256": "c" * 64}
report["changed_live_profile"] = True
report["live_behavior_manifest_unchanged"] = False
receipt = verify(report)
assert receipt["status"] == "fail"
assert receipt["outcomes"]["did_not_change_canonical_knowledge"] is False
assert receipt["outcomes"]["did_not_turn_the_test_conversation_into_hidden_training"] is False
def test_plausible_reply_without_source_challenge_or_iteration_fails() -> None:
report = copy.deepcopy(passing_report())
report["results"][0]["reply"] = "The claim is shallow. I propose several better claims."
receipt = verify(report)
assert receipt["status"] == "fail"
assert receipt["checks"]["claim_support_challenged"] is False
assert receipt["checks"]["user_iteration_requested_before_live"] is False