teleo/teleo-infrastructure
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 2 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat: support fundraise record_type alongside decision_market

Browse source 
LLM now classifies proposals as either decision_market (governance votes)
or fundraise (ICO/launch capital raises). Both handled by same extractor.

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-23 18:04:30 +00:00
parent e1934b30ae
commit 6c6cd0d14e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
extract-decisions.py
View file

@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ Given this proposal source, produce a JSON object with these fields:
- "proposer": Who proposed it (name or handle) - "proposer": Who proposed it (name or handle)
- "proposal_date": ISO date when created - "proposal_date": ISO date when created
- "resolution_date": ISO date when resolved (null if active) - "resolution_date": ISO date when resolved (null if active)
- "record_type": One of: "decision_market" (governance proposals voted on via futarchy) or "fundraise" (ICO/launch raising capital through MetaDAO or Futardio)
- "category": One of: treasury, hiring, product, governance, fundraise, incentives, migration, other - "category": One of: treasury, hiring, product, governance, fundraise, incentives, migration, other
- "summary": 1-2 sentence summary of what this proposal does and why it matters. Be specific — include dollar amounts, key parameters, and outcomes. - "summary": 1-2 sentence summary of what this proposal does and why it matters. Be specific — include dollar amounts, key parameters, and outcomes.
- "significance": 2-3 paragraphs analyzing why this proposal matters for the futarchy ecosystem. What does it prove or test? What precedent does it set? How does it relate to broader governance patterns? - "significance": 2-3 paragraphs analyzing why this proposal matters for the futarchy ecosystem. What does it prove or test? What precedent does it set? How does it relate to broader governance patterns?
@ -234,9 +235,10 @@ def build_decision_record(source_path: Path, dry_run: bool = False) -> Path | No
market_lines.append(line_stripped) market_lines.append(line_stripped)
# Build frontmatter # Build frontmatter
record_type = analysis.get("record_type", "decision_market")
record_fm = { record_fm = {
"type": "decision", "type": "decision",
"entity_type": "decision_market", "entity_type": record_type,
"name": analysis.get("name", title), "name": analysis.get("name", title),
"domain": domain, "domain": domain,
"status": analysis.get("status", "unknown"), "status": analysis.get("status", "unknown"),